Literature DB >> 29355438

Insulin Sensitivity Index-Based Optimization of Insulin to Carbohydrate Ratio: In Silico Study Shows Efficacious Protection Against Hypoglycemic Events Caused by Suboptimal Therapy.

Michele Schiavon1, Chiara Dalla Man1, Claudio Cobelli1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The insulin to carbohydrate ratio (CR) is a parameter used by patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) to calculate the premeal insulin bolus. Usually, it is estimated by the physician based on patient diary, but modern diabetes technologies, such as subcutaneous glucose sensing (continuous glucose monitoring, CGM) and insulin delivery (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, CSII) systems, can provide important information for its optimization. In this study, a method for CR optimization based on CGM and CSII data is presented and its efficacy and robustness tested in several in silico scenarios, with the primary aim of increasing protection against hypoglycemia.
METHODS: The method is based on a validated index of insulin sensitivity calculated from sensor and pump data (SISP), area under CGM and CSII curves. The efficacy and robustness of the method are tested in silico using the University of Virginia/Padova T1D simulator, in several suboptimal therapy scenarios: with nominal CR variation, over/underestimation of meal size or suboptimal basal insulin infusion. Simulated CGM and CSII data were used to calculate the optimal CR. The same scenarios were then repeated using the estimated CR and glycemic control was compared.
RESULTS: The optimized CR was efficacious in protecting against hypoglycemic events caused by suboptimal therapy. The method was also robust to possible error in carbohydrate count and suboptimal basal insulin infusion.
CONCLUSIONS: A novel method for CR optimization in T1D, implementable in daily life using CGM and CSII data, is proposed. The method can be used both in open- and closed-loop insulin therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bolus calculator; Continuous glucose monitoring; Diabetes therapy; Insulin bolus.; Type 1 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29355438      PMCID: PMC5771547          DOI: 10.1089/dia.2017.0248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  28 in total

1.  Minimal model estimation of glucose absorption and insulin sensitivity from oral test: validation with a tracer method.

Authors:  Chiara Dalla Man; Andrea Caumo; Rita Basu; Robert Rizza; Gianna Toffolo; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 4.310

Review 2.  Impact of fat, protein, and glycemic index on postprandial glucose control in type 1 diabetes: implications for intensive diabetes management in the continuous glucose monitoring era.

Authors:  Kirstine J Bell; Carmel E Smart; Garry M Steil; Jennie C Brand-Miller; Bruce King; Howard A Wolpert
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  A pilot study of the continuous glucose monitoring system: clinical decisions and glycemic control after its use in pediatric type 1 diabetic subjects.

Authors:  F R Kaufman; L C Gibson; M Halvorson; S Carpenter; L K Fisher; P Pitukcheewanont
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Run-to-run tuning of model predictive control for type 1 diabetes subjects: in silico trial.

Authors:  Lalo Magni; Marco Forgione; Chiara Toffanin; Chiara Dalla Man; Boris Kovatchev; Giuseppe De Nicolao; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-09-01

5.  Clinical accuracy of a continuous glucose monitoring system with an advanced algorithm.

Authors:  Timothy S Bailey; Anna Chang; Mark Christiansen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-03

6.  The UVA/PADOVA Type 1 Diabetes Simulator: New Features.

Authors:  Chiara Dalla Man; Francesco Micheletto; Dayu Lv; Marc Breton; Boris Kovatchev; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-01

7.  A bolus calculator is an effective means of controlling postprandial glycemia in patients on insulin pump therapy.

Authors:  Todd M Gross; David Kayne; Allen King; Carla Rother; Suzanne Juth
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Advanced Insulin Bolus Advisor Based on Run-To-Run Control and Case-Based Reasoning.

Authors:  Pau Herrero; Peter Pesl; Monika Reddy; Nick Oliver; Pantelis Georgiou; Christofer Toumazou
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.772

9.  Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity in type 1 diabetic subjects wearing a sensor-augmented insulin pump.

Authors:  Michele Schiavon; Chiara Dalla Man; Yogish C Kudva; Ananda Basu; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Diurnal pattern of insulin action in type 1 diabetes: implications for a closed-loop system.

Authors:  Ling Hinshaw; Chiara Dalla Man; Debashis K Nandy; Ahmed Saad; Adil E Bharucha; James A Levine; Robert A Rizza; Rita Basu; Rickey E Carter; Claudio Cobelli; Yogish C Kudva; Ananda Basu
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 9.461

View more
  3 in total

1.  Carbohydrate Requirement for Exercise in Type 1 Diabetes: Effects of Insulin Concentration.

Authors:  Maria Pia Francescato; Miloš Ajčević; Agostino Accardo
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-02-15

2.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Current Use in Diabetes Management and Possible Future Applications.

Authors:  Martina Vettoretti; Giacomo Cappon; Giada Acciaroli; Andrea Facchinetti; Giovanni Sparacino
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-05-22

3.  Mathematical Models of Meal Amount and Timing Variability With Implementation in the Type-1 Diabetes Patient Decision Simulator.

Authors:  Nunzio Camerlingo; Martina Vettoretti; Simone Del Favero; Andrea Facchinetti; Giovanni Sparacino
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.