Literature DB >> 29354878

Relative effects of genetic variation sensu lato and sexual dimorphism on plant traits and associated arthropod communities.

Colleen S Nell1, Maria M Meza-Lopez1, Jordan R Croy1, Annika S Nelson1, Xoaquín Moreira2, Jessica D Pratt1, Kailen A Mooney3.   

Abstract

Intraspecific plant trait variation can have cascading effects on plant-associated biotic communities. Sexual dimorphism is an important axis of genetic variation in dioecious plants, but the strength of such effects and the underlying mechanisms relative to genetic variation are unknown. We established a common garden with 39 genotypes of Baccharis salicifolia sampled from a single population that included male and female genotypes and measured plant traits and quantified associated arthropod communities. Genetic variation sensu lato (genotypic variation) had strong effects on most plant traits (flower number, relative growth rate, specific leaf area, percent water content, carbon-nitrogen ratio, monoterpene but not sesquiterpene concentrations) and on herbivore and predator density, and on arthropod community composition (relative abundance of 14 orders). In contrast, sexual dimorphism had weaker effects on only a few plant traits (flower number and relative growth rate), on predator density, and on arthropod community composition, but had no effect on herbivore density. Variation in flower number drove genetic variation sensu lato and sex dimorphism in predator density and arthropod community composition. There was unique genetic variation sensu lato in herbivore density (positively) associated with monoterpene concentration and in arthropod community composition associated with specific leaf area and carbon-nitrogen ratio. There was unique sexual dimorphism in arthropod community composition associated with plant relative growth rate. Together, these results demonstrate that genetic variation sensu lato and sexual dimorphism can shape plant-associated arthropod communities via both parallel and unique mechanisms, with greater overall effects of the former.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dioecy; Herbivores; Plant resistance; Predators; Tritrophic

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29354878     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-018-4065-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  27 in total

1.  Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature.

Authors:  A Kessler; I T Baldwin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Importance of species interactions to community heritability: a genetic basis to trophic-level interactions.

Authors:  Joseph K Bailey; Stuart C Wooley; Richard L Lindroth; Thomas G Whitham
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense.

Authors:  P D Coley; J P Bryant; F S Chapin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Genetic variation in a tropical tree species influences the associated epiphytic plant and invertebrate communities in a complex forest ecosystem.

Authors:  Sharon E Zytynska; Michael F Fay; David Penney; Richard F Preziosi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Effects of intercropping with flowering plants on predation of Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) eggs by generalist predators in bell peppers.

Authors:  M W Bickerton; G C Hamilton
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.377

6.  Effects of plant neighborhoods on plant-herbivore interactions: resource dilution and associational effects.

Authors:  Peter A Hambäck; Brian D Inouye; Petter Andersson; Nora Underwood
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  Herbivore specificity and the chemical basis of plant-plant communication in Baccharis salicifolia (Asteraceae).

Authors:  Xoaquín Moreira; Colleen S Nell; Angelos Katsanis; Sergio Rasmann; Kailen A Mooney
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  Plant genetics affects arthropod community richness and composition: evidence from a synthetic eucalypt hybrid population.

Authors:  H S Dungey; B M Potts; T G Whitham; H F Li
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Plant defense syndromes.

Authors:  Anurag A Agrawal; Mark Fishbein
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  Sex-related differences in reproductive allocation, growth, defense and herbivory in three dioecious neotropical palms.

Authors:  Verónica Cepeda-Cornejo; Rodolfo Dirzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Correction to: 'Sexual dimorphism in a top predator ( Notophthalmus viridescens) drives aquatic prey community assembly'.

Authors:  D Start; S De Lisle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Consistent community genetic effects in the context of strong environmental and temporal variation in Eucalyptus.

Authors:  Benjamin J Gosney; Brad M Potts; Lynne G Forster; Carmen Whiteley; Julianne M O'Reilly-Wapstra
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  From plants to herbivores: novel insights into the ecological and evolutionary consequences of plant variation.

Authors:  Caroline Müller; Colin M Orians
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Genotypic variation in plant traits shapes herbivorous insect and ant communities on a foundation tree species.

Authors:  Hilary L Barker; Liza M Holeski; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sexual and genotypic variation in terpene quantitative and qualitative profiles in the dioecious shrub Baccharis salicifolia.

Authors:  Xoaquín Moreira; Luis Abdala-Roberts; Colleen S Nell; Carla Vázquez-González; Jessica D Pratt; Ken Keefover-Ring; Kailen A Mooney
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Plant volatiles as cues and signals in plant communication.

Authors:  Velemir Ninkovic; Dimitrije Markovic; Merlin Rensing
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 7.228

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.