Literature DB >> 16922309

Plant defense syndromes.

Anurag A Agrawal1, Mark Fishbein.   

Abstract

Given that a plant's defensive strategy against herbivory is never likely to be a single trait, we develop the concept of plant defense syndromes, where association with specific ecological interactions can result in convergence on suites of covarying defensive traits. Defense syndromes can be studied within communities of diverse plant species as well as within clades of closely related species. In either case, theory predicts that plant defense traits can consistently covary across species, due to shared evolutionary ancestry or due to adaptive convergence. We examined potential defense syndromes in 24 species of milkweeds (Asclepias spp.) in a field experiment. Employing phylogenetically independent contrasts, we found few correlations between seven defensive traits, no bivariate trade-offs, and notable positive correlations between trichome density and latex production, and between C:N ratio and leaf toughness. We then used a hierarchical cluster analysis to produce a phenogram of defense trait similarity among the 24 species. This analysis revealed three distinct clusters of species. The defense syndromes of these species clusters are associated with either low nutritional quality or a balance of higher nutritional quality coupled with physical or chemical defenses. The phenogram based on defense traits was not congruent, however, with a molecular phylogeny of the group, suggesting convergence on defense syndromes. Finally, we examined the performance of monarch butterfly caterpillars on the 24 milkweed species in the field; monarch growth and survival did not differ on plants in the three syndromes, although multiple regression revealed that leaf trichomes and toughness significantly reduced caterpillar growth. The discovery of convergent plant defense syndromes can be used as a framework to ask questions about how abiotic environments, communities of herbivores, and biogeography are associated with particular defense strategies of plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16922309     DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[132:pds]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  97 in total

1.  Attenuation of the jasmonate burst, plant defensive traits, and resistance to specialist monarch caterpillars on shaded common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca).

Authors:  Anurag A Agrawal; Emily E Kearney; Amy P Hastings; Trey E Ramsey
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Evolutionary indirect effects of biological invasions.

Authors:  Jennifer A Lau
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Soil nutrient additions increase invertebrate herbivore abundances, but not herbivory, across three grassland systems.

Authors:  Kimberly J La Pierre; Melinda D Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Plant defence as a complex and changing phenotype throughout ontogeny.

Authors:  Sofía Ochoa-López; Nora Villamil; Paulina Zedillo-Avelleyra; Karina Boege
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 5.  In defense of roots: a research agenda for studying plant resistance to belowground herbivory.

Authors:  Sergio Rasmann; Anurag A Agrawal
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Correlations between leaf toughness and phenolics among species in contrasting environments of Australia and New Caledonia.

Authors:  Jennifer Read; Gordon D Sanson; Elizabeth Caldwell; Fiona J Clissold; Alex Chatain; Paula Peeters; Byron B Lamont; Michel De Garine-Wichatitsky; Tanguy Jaffré; Stuart Kerr
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Phylogenetic escalation and decline of plant defense strategies.

Authors:  Anurag A Agrawal; Mark Fishbein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Difference in defense strategy in flower heads and leaves of Asteraceae: multiple-species approach.

Authors:  Michio Oguro; Satoki Sakai
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Prickles, latex, and tolerance in the endemic Hawaiian prickly poppy (Argemone glauca): variation between populations, across ontogeny, and in response to abiotic factors.

Authors:  Kasey E Barton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Induced responses to herbivory and jasmonate in three milkweed species.

Authors:  Sergio Rasmann; M Daisy Johnson; Anurag A Agrawal
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.