| Literature DB >> 29354232 |
Kyung Il Jo1,2, Na-Rae Yang3, Pyoung Jeon1, Keon Ha Kim1, Seung-Chyul Hong2, Jong Soo Kim2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the immediate and long-term efficacy and safety of coil embolization for large or giant aneurysms.Entities:
Keywords: Endovascular procedures; Giant intracranial aneurysm; Recurrence; Treatment failure
Year: 2017 PMID: 29354232 PMCID: PMC5769845 DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2016.0101.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Korean Neurosurg Soc ISSN: 1225-8245
Baseline patient characteristics
| Characteristics | Value |
|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 43/107 |
|
| |
| Age (years) | 58.2±11.3 |
|
| |
| Aneurysm characteristics | |
| Ruptured aneurysm | 30 |
| Incorporating vessel | 59 |
| Thrombosed aneurysm | 13 |
| Daughter sac | 87 |
|
| |
| Location | |
| Distal internal carotid artery | 100 |
| Anterior cerebral artery | 18 |
| Middle cerebral artery | 5 |
| Posterior circulation | 27 |
|
| |
| Size | |
| 10–25 mm | 139 |
| >25 mm | 11 |
Fig. 1Estimated major and minor recurrence-free rate.
Characteristics of patients with and without major recurrence
| Characteristics | No major recurrence (n=127) | Major recurrence (n=23) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (female) | 90 | 17 | 0.776 |
|
| |||
| Median age (years) | 57 (34–79) | 60 (40–85) | 0.584 |
|
| |||
| Aneurysm characteristics | |||
| Ruptured aneurysm | 25 | 5 | 0.821 |
| Incorporating vessel | 45 | 14 | 0.022 |
| Thrombosed aneurysm | 11 | 2 | 1.000 |
| Daughter sac | 79 | 8 | 0.014 |
|
| |||
| Location | 0.085 | ||
| Distal internal carotid artery | 86 | 14 | |
| Anterior cerebral artery | 17 | 1 | |
| Middle cerebral artery | 5 | 0 | |
| Posterior circulation | 19 | 8 | |
|
| |||
| Size (>25 mm) | 10 | 1 | 0.551 |
|
| |||
| Use of stent | 54 | 8 | 0.782 |
|
| |||
| Occlusion status | 0.001 | ||
| Complete | 27 | 0 | |
| Residual neck | 77 | 11 | |
| Incomplete | 23 | 12 | |
Values are presented as number (range)
Parameters potentially affecting major recurrence
| Univariate | Multivariate | Hazard ratio | 95% confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (female) | 0.423 | |||
| Incorporating vessel | 0.147 | |||
| Daughter sac | 0.548 | |||
| Thrombosed aneurysm | 0.065 | 0.144 | 3.03 | 0.68–13.51 |
| Location | 0.130 | |||
| Ruptured aneurysm | 0.238 | |||
| Size (>25 mm) | 0.810 | |||
| Use of stent | 0.563 | |||
| Occlusion status | 0.028 | 0.008 | 3.15 | 1.34–7.41 |
Fig. 2Actuarial major recurrence rate according to occlusion status.
Fig. 3Actuarial major recurrence rate according to incidence of intra-aneurysmal thrombus.
Information of the patients with major recurrence
| Patient number | Age | Gender | Location of aneurysm | Maximal diameter (mm) | Dome-neck ratio | Type of treatment | Initial occlusion | Time to recurrence (months) | Type of recurrence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63 | Female | P-com | 19 | 1.7 | Simple | Residual neck | 11 | Asymptomatic |
| 2 | 48 | Female | Basilar tip | 33 | 1.0 | Simple | Incomplete | 0 | Rupture |
| 3 | 63 | Female | P1/2 | 17 | 1.3 | Simple | Incomplete | 17 | Asymptomatic |
| 4 | 69 | Female | Cavernous ICA | 18 | 1.0 | Stent assisted (enterprise) | Incomplete | 15 | Asymptomatic |
| 5 | 72 | Female | P-com | 13 | 1.0 | Simple | Incomplete | 44 | Asymptomatic |
| 6 | 53 | Female | Paraclinoid ICA | 16.7 | 1.1 | Stent assisted (enterprise) | Incomplete | 50 | Asymptomatic |
| 7 | 60 | Female | Paraclinoid ICA | 19.5 | 1.6 | Simple | Incomplete | 43 | Asymptomatic |
| 8 | 55 | Female | Paraclinoid ICA | 20 | 1.7 | Simple | Residual neck | 45 | Asymptomatic |
| 9 | 53 | Male | Basilar tip | 17.3 | 1.3 | Simple | Residual neck | 67 | Asymptomatic |
| 10 | 46 | Female | Basilar tip | 13.5 | 1.6 | Simple | Incomplete | 68 | Asymptomatic |
| 11 | 42 | Female | Cavernous ICA | 20.3 | 1.0 | Stent assisted (neuroform) | Incomplete | 61 | Asymptomatic |
| 12 | 70 | Female | Basilar tip | 11.4 | 1.0 | Simple | Residual neck | 7 | Symptomatic |
| 13 | 85 | Female | P-com | 16 | 1.0 | Simple | Residual neck | 21 | Asymptomatic |
| 14 | 72 | Female | Cavernous ICA | 18 | 1.0 | Stent assisted (enterprise) | Incomplete | 30 | Asymptomatic |
| 15 | 65 | Female | P-com | 12 | 1.1 | Simple | Incomplete | 67 | Asymptomatic |
| 16 | 62 | Male | A-com | 12 | 1.1 | Simple | Incomplete | 108 | Rupture |
| 17 | 47 | Male | Basilar tip | 24.5 | 1.2 | Stent assisted (enterprise) | Residual neck | 6 | Asymptomatic |
| 18 | 42 | Male | Basilar tip | 17.3 | 1.4 | Stent assisted (enterprise) | Residual neck | 71 | Asymptomatic |
| 19 | 40 | Male | Basilar tip | 15.5 | 1.2 | Simple | Residual neck | 101 | Asymptomatic |
| 20 | 60 | Female | Paraclinoid ICA | 15.8 | 1.0 | Simple | 3 | 61 | Asymptomatic |
| 21 | 53 | Female | CavernousICA | 16.5 | 1.0 | Stent assisted (enterprise) | Residual neck | 28 | Aymptomatic |
| 22 | 56 | Male | P-com | 14.7 | 1.2 | Stent assisted (enterprise) | Residual neck | 6 | Asymptomatic |
| 23 | 63 | Female | Cavernous ICA | 19 | 1.7 | Simple | Residual neck | 11 | Symptomatic |
P-com : posterior communicating artery, ICA : internal carotid artery
Fig. 4Actuarial stroke-free survival rate.