Atsushi Sakaoka1,2, Masafumi Koshimizu1, Shintaro Nakamura1, Kiyoshi Matsumura2. 1. Evaluation Center, R&D Administration and Promotion Department, Terumo Corporation, 1500 Inokuchi, Nakai-machi, Ashigarakami-gun, Kanagawa 259-0151, Japan. 2. Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka Institute of Technology, 5-16-1 Omiya, Asahi-ku, Osaka 535-8585, Japan.
Abstract
Swine are the most common animal model in preclinical studies of cardiovascular devices. Because of the recent trend for development of new devices for percutaneous catheterization, especially for the renal arteries (RAs), we examined the quantitative anatomical dimensions of the RAs and adjacent aorta in swine. Angiographic images were analyzed in 66 female Yorkshire/Landrace crossbred swine. The diameter of both the right and left main RA was 5.4 ± 0.6 mm. The length of the right main RA was significantly longer than that of the left (29.8 ± 7.5 mm vs. 20.6 ± 5.4 mm, respectively; P<0.001). The diameter of both the right and left branch RA with diameters ≥3 mm (the target vessel diameter of recently developed devices) was 3.8 ± 0.5 mm. The right branch RA was significantly longer than that of the left (18.9 ± 7.8 mm vs. 16.4 ± 7.4 mm, respectively; P<0.05). The branching angle of the right RA from the aorta was significantly smaller than that of the left (91 ± 12° vs. 103 ± 15°, respectively; P<0.001). The diameters of the suprarenal and infrarenal aorta were 10.6 ± 1.1 mm and 9.7 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. In conclusion, because of their similar dimensions to human, swine are an appropriate animal model for assessing the safety of, and determining optimal design of, catheter devices for RAs in simulated clinical use. However, there were species differences in the branching angle and adjacent aorta diameter, suggesting that swine models alone are inadequate to assess the delivery performance of catheter devices for RAs.
Swine are the most common animal model in preclinical studies of cardiovascular devices. Because of the recent trend for development of new devices for percutaneous catheterization, especially for the renal arteries (RAs), we examined the quantitative anatomical dimensions of the RAs and adjacent aorta in swine. Angiographic images were analyzed in 66 female Yorkshire/Landrace crossbred swine. The diameter of both the right and left main RA was 5.4 ± 0.6 mm. The length of the right main RA was significantly longer than that of the left (29.8 ± 7.5 mm vs. 20.6 ± 5.4 mm, respectively; P<0.001). The diameter of both the right and left branch RA with diameters ≥3 mm (the target vessel diameter of recently developed devices) was 3.8 ± 0.5 mm. The right branch RA was significantly longer than that of the left (18.9 ± 7.8 mm vs. 16.4 ± 7.4 mm, respectively; P<0.05). The branching angle of the right RA from the aorta was significantly smaller than that of the left (91 ± 12° vs. 103 ± 15°, respectively; P<0.001). The diameters of the suprarenal and infrarenal aorta were 10.6 ± 1.1 mm and 9.7 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. In conclusion, because of their similar dimensions to human, swine are an appropriate animal model for assessing the safety of, and determining optimal design of, catheter devices for RAs in simulated clinical use. However, there were species differences in the branching angle and adjacent aorta diameter, suggesting that swine models alone are inadequate to assess the delivery performance of catheter devices for RAs.
Swine are the most common animal model used in preclinical studies of cardiovascular
devices because of their physiological and anatomical similarities with humans [2, 9, 22, 28, 29]. In terms of development of cardiovascular devices,
there is a recent trend for developing devices for percutaneous catheterization, which is a
less invasive treatment than surgical operation, to minimize the burden on patients. The
renal arteries (RAs) are one of the target vessels for percutaneous catheterization.
Intravascular balloon catheters and stents have already been commercialized to dilate
stenotic lesions in the RAs. Further, renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has emerged as a
novel treatment option for hypertension to irreversibly suppress renal sympathetic activity
using intra-RA catheters [1]. Although RDN devices
have not yet been commercialized in Japan or the US, RDN devices adopting various
technologies (e.g., heating with radiofrequency or ultrasound emission, and injection of
neurotoxin with puncture needles) have been actively developed [4, 8, 24,25,26].Despite common use of swine, there are only limited data on the anatomy of the porcine RAs.
While a similar branching RA pattern was reported between swine and human [5, 21], no
anatomical dimensions have been described. As the RAs are the direct anatomical target for
catheter insertion, their dimensions can affect mechanical injury by direct contact of
catheters, thermal injury, and mechano-chemical injury by puncture injection of a toxin. The
RA dimension is also critical during in vivo testing of prototypes for
design optimization (e.g., the radial force of an electrode on the arterial wall, and length
or shape of the puncture needle). Moreover, in preclinical studies of cardiovascular
devices, it is required by regulatory agencies and international standards to assess
in vivo performance for safe delivery of intravascular catheters to the
target structure and deployment of the device as intended [9, 13, 14]. The performance of insertion and deployment in RAs is affected by the RA
dimension, the RA branching angle from the aorta, and the diameter of the adjacent aorta
[33]. Therefore, it is important to understand the
similarities of RA dimensions between swine and human to predict the safety and performance
of RA devices in the clinical setting based on preclinical findings.The aim of the present study was to investigate the quantitative anatomical characteristics
of the RA in swine, including RA dimensions, branching angle of the RA from the aorta, and
the diameter of the adjacent aorta, using catheter angiography, the gold standard in
percutaneous catheterization, and to describe their similarities to human.
Materials and Methods
Animals
All procedures involving animals were approved by our Institutional Animal Care and Use
Committees. A total of 66 female Yorkshire/Landrace crossbred swine (51.0–75.2 kg, 3.9–5.4
months old) were supplied from San-esu Breeding (Chiba, Japan) and Palmetto Research Swine
(Reevesville, SC, USA). Females were selected as urethral catheterization for enhancement
of urinary excretion of administered contrast media for angiography is only possible in
females [30].
Experimental procedures
All animals were pre-medicated with aspirin (325 or 330 mg per os) from a minimum 1 day
prior to the procedure. After anesthesia induction, swine were intubated and connected to
mechanical ventilation. Anesthesia was maintained with 2–4% sevoflurane or 0.5–5%
isoflurane by inhalation throughout the procedure. Anticoagulation during catheterization
was achieved with intravenous heparin (100–300 units/kg) to maintain the activated
clotting time at ≥250 s, as typically performed in clinical practice. A 6F or 7F
introducer sheath was placed by percutaneous cannulation of the femoral artery, and a 6F
or 7F guiding catheter was advanced to approach the RAs. Angiographic images of the aorta
were acquired by administration of contrast media from the guiding catheter located in the
aorta around the RAs. Intra-arterial nitroglycerin (200 µg) was then
administered into the right and left RAs, followed by selective renal angiography by
administration of contrast media from the guiding catheter into the right or left RAs.
Angiographic images were acquired by C-arm angiography machines with Infinix Celeve-i
INFX-8000V (Toshiba Medical Systems, Tochigi, Japan), GE Innova 3100 (GE Healthcare,
Milwaukee, WI, USA), or Philips Allura Xper FD10 (Phillips Healthcare, Amsterdam, the
Netherlands) flat detectors.
Measurement procedures
Angiographic images obtained prior to any treatment with test devices were
retrospectively analyzed in the present study. The diameter of the RAs and their adjacent
aorta, and the length of the RAs (Fig. 1 and Table 1), were measured with a CAAS 2000 (Pie Medical Imaging, Maastricht, The
Netherlands)-based quantitative vascular analysis software using an automated edge
detection system. The mean diameter was automatically calculated in the measured segment.
A calibration process was performed prior to each measurement to determine the
millimeter-to-pixel ratio of the angiographic images based on the size of the guide
catheter in each image. The branching angle of the RAs from the aorta were measured with
imaging software (ImageJ [27]; NIH, Bethesda, MD,
USA). The diameter of the suprarenal aorta from one animal was not measured because of
inadequate contrast of the acquired image.
Fig. 1.
Illustration of measured vasculatures in angiographic images. (A) The right and the
left branching angles of renal arteries (RAs) from the aorta were measured. The
diameters of the suprarenal and the infrarenal aorta were measured at the superior
and inferior positions of the RAs, respectively. (B) The diameters and lengths of
the RAs were measured. The main RA was defined as a single arterial segment from the
renal ostium to the first bifurcation. The branch RAs were defined as all arterial
segments at the post-bifurcation. Among the branch RAs, the segments that had a
diameter ≥3 mm were measured. If the measured diameter was <3 mm, the values were
excluded from data analysis. Rt., right; Lt., left.
Table 1.
Measured vasculatures and selection rationale
Measured vasculature and parameter
Rationale of parameter selection
Diameter and length of main RA (right and left)
Applied segments of most current intravascular
devices for RAs
Diameter and length of branch of RA with diameter ≥3
mm (right and left)
Applied segments of recently developed RDN
devicesa)
Branching angle of RA from the aorta (right and
left)
Angles affecting deliverability of catheters into
RA
Diameter of suprarenal and infrarenal aorta
Segments affecting deliverability of catheters into
RA
a)The Symplicity Spyral (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and the
IberisBloom (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan). RA=renal artery. RDN=renal sympathetic
denervation.
Illustration of measured vasculatures in angiographic images. (A) The right and the
left branching angles of renal arteries (RAs) from the aorta were measured. The
diameters of the suprarenal and the infrarenal aorta were measured at the superior
and inferior positions of the RAs, respectively. (B) The diameters and lengths of
the RAs were measured. The main RA was defined as a single arterial segment from the
renal ostium to the first bifurcation. The branch RAs were defined as all arterial
segments at the post-bifurcation. Among the branch RAs, the segments that had a
diameter ≥3 mm were measured. If the measured diameter was <3 mm, the values were
excluded from data analysis. Rt., right; Lt., left.a)The Symplicity Spyral (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and the
IberisBloom (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan). RA=renal artery. RDN=renal sympathetic
denervation.
Data analysis
Data are presented as mean ± SD. The following parameters between right and left main RA
were compared with a paired t test: diameter, and length and branching
angle from the aorta. The diameter and length between the right and left branch RA were
compared with an unpaired t test. Pearson’s correlation coefficients and scatter plots
were used to investigate the correlation of body weight with dimensions of both the main
RA and the branch RAs with a diameter ≥3 mm. All statistical analyses were performed with
GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). A
P-value<0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.
Results
The average diameter of the right and left main RAs was 5.4 ± 0.6 mm (Fig. 2A), with no differences between the right and left sides. The right main RA was
significantly longer than that of the left main RA (29.8 ± 7.5 mm vs. 20.6 ± 5.4 mm,
respectively; P<0.001) (Fig.
2B). The number of branch RAs with a diameter ≥3 mm was 1.6 ± 0.7 (range 0–3) for
the right and left RAs. The average diameter of the right and left branch RA was 3.8 ± 0.5
mm, with no differences between the right and the left sides (Fig. 2A). The right branch RA was significantly longer than that of
the left branch RA (18.9 ± 7.8 mm vs. 16.4 ± 7.4 mm, respectively;
P<0.05) (Fig. 2B). There was
no correlation of body weight with main RA dimensions (Fig. 3). In the branch RA, there were significant but weak positive correlations of body
weight with all dimensions (r=0.22–0.27), except for the right branch RA length (Fig. 4).
Fig. 2.
Box plots of the diameter (A) and the length (B) of the RAs. Data are mean ± SD.
P-values are shown in each plot.
Fig. 3.
Scatter plots between body weight and dimensions of the main RA. The dimension
parameters included the diameters of the right (A) and left (B) main RAs, and the
lengths of the right (C) and left (D) main RAs. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r)
and P-values are shown in each plot.
Fig. 4.
Scatter plots between the body weight and the dimensions of the branch RAs with a
diameter of ≥3 mm. The dimension parameters included the diameters of the right (A)
and the left (B) branch RAs, and the lengths of the right (C) and the left (D) branch
RAs. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) and P-values are shown in
each plot.
Box plots of the diameter (A) and the length (B) of the RAs. Data are mean ± SD.
P-values are shown in each plot.Scatter plots between body weight and dimensions of the main RA. The dimension
parameters included the diameters of the right (A) and left (B) main RAs, and the
lengths of the right (C) and left (D) main RAs. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r)
and P-values are shown in each plot.Scatter plots between the body weight and the dimensions of the branch RAs with a
diameter of ≥3 mm. The dimension parameters included the diameters of the right (A)
and the left (B) branch RAs, and the lengths of the right (C) and the left (D) branch
RAs. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) and P-values are shown in
each plot.The branching angle of the right RA from the aorta was significantly smaller than that of
the left RA (91 ± 12° vs. 103 ± 15°, respectively; P<0.001) (Fig. 5). The diameters of the suprarenal and the infrarenal aorta were 10.6 ± 1.1 mm and 9.7
± 0.9 mm, respectively (Fig. 6).
Fig. 5.
Box plot of the branching angles from the aorta of the right and the left RAs. Data
are mean ± SD. P-values are shown in each plot.
Fig. 6.
Box plot of the diameters of the suprarenal and infrarenal aortas. Data are mean ±
SD.
Box plot of the branching angles from the aorta of the right and the left RAs. Data
are mean ± SD. P-values are shown in each plot.Box plot of the diameters of the suprarenal and infrarenal aortas. Data are mean ±
SD.
Discussion
The present study investigated the angiographic anatomical dimensions of the RAs and
adjacent aorta in Yorkshire/Landrace crossbred swine, which are commonly used for in
vivo evaluation of cardiovascular devices. Despite the numerous preclinical
studies of intra-renal-arterial catheter devices, these anatomical dimensions were
previously unknown in the swine, although the anatomical dimensions of the RAs and adjacent
aorta were reported in humans.The mean diameter of the human main RA was reported as 5–6 mm, with no differences between
the right and the left sides (Fig. 7A) [6, 20,
23, 31,
32]. In the present study, the mean diameter of the
porcine main RA was 5.4 mm, with no difference between the right and the left sides, which
was equivalent to human. The mean length of human main RA was 41.2–43.7 mm for the right RA
and 32.2–36.5 mm for the left RA, which were significantly different by approximately 10 mm
(Fig. 7B) [6, 20]. In the present study, the mean
length of the porcine main RA was 29.8 mm for the right RA and 20.6 mm for the left RA,
which was shorter than humanRA by 11–16 mm. Nevertheless, as for the human, the right main
RA was approximately 10 mm longer than the left RA in the swine.
Fig. 7.
Comparison of anatomical dimensions between swine and published human data. Each dot
and error bar represent mean and SD, respectively. Data are mean ± SD.
P-values are shown in each plot. (A) The diameter of the main RA.
(B) The length of the main RA. (C) The branching angle of the RA from the aorta. (D)
The diameters of the suprarenal and the infrarenal aortas.
Comparison of anatomical dimensions between swine and published human data. Each dot
and error bar represent mean and SD, respectively. Data are mean ± SD.
P-values are shown in each plot. (A) The diameter of the main RA.
(B) The length of the main RA. (C) The branching angle of the RA from the aorta. (D)
The diameters of the suprarenal and the infrarenal aortas.The branching patterns of the RAs have been systematically investigated in swine and
humans, including the number of arteries, distribution of branch arteries, supplied renal
zone of each branch artery, and their variability in terms of urological surgery, with many
similarities between the two species [5, 21]. However, there are no studies examining the diameter
or length of the branch RA in humans, likely because the main RA is the major clinical
target for commercial balloons and stents to treat stenosis in RAs, and for most RDN devices
under development. However, it was recently reported that an RDN targeting both the main and
branch RAs had greater efficacy than an RDN in the main RA alone in animals [19] and humans [7].
Thus, interest in the anatomical dimensions of the branch RAs is expected to increase with
further human studies. Considering the similarities of the branching patterns of the RAs
between swine and humans, our data provide valuable information on the anatomical dimensions
of branch RAs in the widely used preclinical swine model.The mean branching angle of the RA from the aorta in human was acute in both the right RA
(57°) and the left RA (65°) (Fig. 7C) [11]. While both swine and human show a right branching
angle smaller than the left side (by approximately 10°), the right and left branching angles
in swine were perpendicular or slightly obtuse, and larger than human branching angles by
approximately 35°. In the current clinical standard procedure for percutaneous
catheterization, a catheter is inserted from a femoral artery to access the RAs. In this
situation, the catheter ascends the abdominal aorta from the punctured femoral artery, and
then requires a large downward turn for insertion into the RAs. As such, insertion of a
catheter into a RA in patients with a notable acute branching angle is technically difficult
[10, 33].
Thus, as the porcine branching angle is less than that in humans, the delivery of catheter
devices into the RAs will be easier in swine than in the clinical setting.The mean diameter of the human aorta adjacent to the RAs was approximately 20 mm,
approximately twice that of the porcine aorta (Fig.
7D) [3, 15, 31]. In general, to deliver treatment
catheters such as balloons, stents, and RDN devices to the target position, it is needed to
stabilize a guiding catheter (a pathway for the treatment catheters) approaching the target
vessel with adequate backup force. Less backup force is generated as the contact angle
between the guiding catheter and the reverse side of the aorta decreases [12]. Further, the contact angle is generally lower when
the catheter is located in a smaller diameter aorta. Thus, as the aortic diameter in swine
was half of that in human, delivery of a guiding catheter into the RAs will be more
difficult in swine than in the clinical setting.A previous animal study reported moderate positive correlations of body weight with
arterial diameter (r=0.35–0.62), and weak positive correlations of body weight with arterial
length (r=−0.17–0.36), in porcine femoral and iliac arterial trees [17]. Based on these finding, we investigated the correlation of body
weight with the anatomical dimensions of RAs in swine. However, we found no such
correlations in the main RA, and only weak correlations in the branch RA, except for the
right branch RA length.Although healthy Yorkshire/Landrace crossbred swine are the most common animal model for
in vivo studies using cardiovascular devices, healthy miniature swine are
also used [22, 28]. Further, Ossabaw miniature swine fed with a high calorie diet were reported
as a disease model of metabolic syndrome including hypertension [16], and the efficacy of an RDN device was assessed in the Ossabaw
miniature swine [18]. Thus, assessment of the
anatomical dimensions of the RAs in these swine models may also be useful in future
studies.The present study has several limitations. First, the catheter angiography images are
theoretically projections of three-dimensional vessel structures onto a two-dimensional
plane. Thus, the measured length may have been shorter than the actual length. Nevertheless,
catheter angiography is the gold standard for morphological diagnosis during percutaneous
catheterization in both preclinical studies and in the clinical setting, and is the most
appropriate imaging modality for providing anatomical dimensions of RAs in preclinical
studies. Catheter angiography was also used in the various clinical studies described above
[6, 20].
Thus, our comparison of the length of the main RA between swine and human are based on the
same imaging modality. Second, the anatomical dimensions in male swine were not investigated
in the present study. However, we selected female swine as urethral catheterization to
enhance urinary excretion of administered contrast media is only possible in females [30].In conclusion, we determined the angiographic anatomical dimensions of RAs and adjacent
aorta in swine. The length of the main RA was slightly shorter in swine than that in human,
while the RA diameter and the right and left RA differences were similar between swine and
human. Thus, swine are an appropriate animal model to assess the safety of, and to determine
optimal design of, catheter devices for RAs in simulated clinical use. However, the
branching angle of the RAs from the aorta was larger in swine than that in human, while the
diameter of the adjacent aorta in swine was half of that in human. Thus, the swine model
alone is inadequate to assess delivery performance of catheter devices for RAs.
Conflict of Interest
This study was supported by Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. The authors declare that
there is no conflict of interest.
Authors: Robert A Byrne; Patrick W Serruys; Andreas Baumbach; Javier Escaned; Jean Fajadet; Stefan James; Michael Joner; Semih Oktay; Peter Jüni; Adnan Kastrati; George Sianos; Giulio G Stefanini; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: David Hernández; José Luis Cuevas; Laura Ludovica Gramegna; Manuel Requena; Carlos Piñana; Marta de Dios; Pilar Coscojuela; Marielle Esteves; Jiahui Li; Alberto Gil; Marc Ribó; Alejandro Tomasello Journal: Transl Stroke Res Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 6.829
Authors: Jacob Hindrik Antunes Smit; Eduardo Piotto Leonardi; Rosa Helena de Figueiredo Chaves; Ismari Perini Furlaneto; Cezar Massoud Salame da Silva; Simone de Campos Vieira Abib; Adenauer Marinho de Oliveira Góes Junior Journal: Acta Cir Bras Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 1.388
Authors: Adenauer Marinho de Oliveira Góes; Rosa Helena de Figueiredo Chaves; Ismari Perini Furlaneto; Emanuelle de Matos Rodrigues; Flávia Beatriz Araújo de Albuquerque; Jacob Hindrik Antunes Smit; Carolina Pinheiro de Oliveira; Simone de Campos Vieira Abib Journal: J Vasc Bras Date: 2021-05-14