Literature DB >> 29353236

Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: defining the optimal location within the subthalamic nucleus.

Maarten Bot1, P Richard Schuurman1, Vincent J J Odekerken2, Rens Verhagen1,2, Fiorella Maria Contarino2,3,4, Rob M A De Bie2, Pepijn van den Munckhof1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Individual motor improvement after deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for Parkinson's disease (PD) varies considerably. Stereotactic targeting of the dorsolateral sensorimotor part of the STN is considered paramount for maximising effectiveness, but studies employing the midcommissural point (MCP) as anatomical reference failed to show correlation between DBS location and motor improvement. The medial border of the STN as reference may provide better insight in the relationship between DBS location and clinical outcome.
METHODS: Motor improvement after 12 months of 65 STN DBS electrodes was categorised into non-responding, responding and optimally responding body-sides. Stereotactic coordinates of optimal electrode contacts relative to both medial STN border and MCP served to define theoretic DBS 'hotspots'.
RESULTS: Using the medial STN border as reference, significant negative correlation (Pearson's correlation -0.52, P<0.01) was found between the Euclidean distance from the centre of stimulation to this DBS hotspot and motor improvement. This hotspot was located at 2.8 mm lateral, 1.7 mm anterior and 2.5 mm superior relative to the medial STN border. Using MCP as reference, no correlation was found.
CONCLUSION: The medial STN border proved superior compared with MCP as anatomical reference for correlation of DBS location and motor improvement, and enabled defining an optimal DBS location within the nucleus. We therefore propose the medial STN border as a better individual reference point than the currently used MCP on preoperative stereotactic imaging, in order to obtain optimal and thus less variable motor improvement for individual patients with PD following STN DBS. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29353236     DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-316907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  13 in total

1.  Integrative and Network-Specific Connectivity of the Basal Ganglia and Thalamus Defined in Individuals.

Authors:  Deanna J Greene; Scott Marek; Evan M Gordon; Joshua S Siegel; Caterina Gratton; Timothy O Laumann; Adrian W Gilmore; Jeffrey J Berg; Annie L Nguyen; Donna Dierker; Andrew N Van; Mario Ortega; Dillan J Newbold; Jacqueline M Hampton; Ashley N Nielsen; Kathleen B McDermott; Jarod L Roland; Scott A Norris; Steven M Nelson; Abraham Z Snyder; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen; Nico U F Dosenbach
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Neuroimaging Technological Advancements for Targeting in Functional Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Alexandre Boutet; Robert Gramer; Christopher J Steele; Gavin J B Elias; Jürgen Germann; Ricardo Maciel; Walter Kucharczyk; Ludvic Zrinzo; Andres M Lozano; Alfonso Fasano
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Defining the Dorsal STN Border Using 7.0-T MRI: A Comparison to Microelectrode Recordings and Lower Field Strength MRI.

Authors:  Maarten Bot; Okker Verhagen; Matthan Caan; Wouter V Potters; Y Dilai; Vincent J J Odekerken; Joke M Dijk; Rob M A de Bie; P Richard Schuurman; Pepijn van den Munckhof
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 1.875

4.  Quantitative susceptibility atlas construction in Montreal Neurological Institute space: towards histological-consistent iron-rich deep brain nucleus subregion identification.

Authors:  Chenyu He; Xiaojun Guan; Weimin Zhang; Jun Li; Chunlei Liu; Hongjiang Wei; Xiaojun Xu; Yuyao Zhang
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.748

5.  [Application of intracranial lead reconstruction in deep brain stimulation therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease].

Authors:  Xiaobin Zheng; Lianghong Yu; Xinlong Wan; Huiqing Wang; Ting Yu; Qiu He; Zhangya Lin; Dezhi Kang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-12-30

6.  Modulation of beta bursts in subthalamic sensorimotor circuits predicts improvement in bradykinesia.

Authors:  Yasmine M Kehnemouyi; Kevin B Wilkins; Chioma M Anidi; Ross W Anderson; Muhammad Furqan Afzal; Helen M Bronte-Stewart
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 15.255

7.  Surgical Strategy for Directional Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Hiroshi Masuda; Hiroshi Shirozu; Yosuke Ito; Masafumi Fukuda; Yukihiko Fujii
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 8.  Technology of deep brain stimulation: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Joachim K Krauss; Nir Lipsman; Tipu Aziz; Alexandre Boutet; Peter Brown; Jin Woo Chang; Benjamin Davidson; Warren M Grill; Marwan I Hariz; Andreas Horn; Michael Schulder; Antonios Mammis; Peter A Tass; Jens Volkmann; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 42.937

9.  Using automated electrode localization to guide stimulation management in DBS.

Authors:  Mikkel V Petersen; Andreas Husch; Christine E Parsons; Torben E Lund; Niels Sunde; Karen Østergaard
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.511

Review 10.  Current Directions in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease-Directing Current to Maximize Clinical Benefit.

Authors:  Aristide Merola; Alberto Romagnolo; Vibhor Krishna; Srivatsan Pallavaram; Stephen Carcieri; Steven Goetz; George Mandybur; Andrew P Duker; Brian Dalm; John D Rolston; Alfonso Fasano; Leo Verhagen
Journal:  Neurol Ther       Date:  2020-03-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.