| Literature DB >> 29351812 |
Alex Sander R Cangussu1,2, Luis André M Mariúba3, Pritesh Lalwani3, Keila Dayane E S Pereira3, Spartaco Astolphi-Filho4, Patricia P Orlandi3, Sabrina Epiphanio5, Kelvison F Viana6, Mucio Flavio B Ribeiro7, Hidelberto M Silva8, Claudio R F Marinho9, Paulo A Nogueira3.
Abstract
Anaplasma marginale (A. marginale) has a remarkable impact on livestock production, and an effective vaccine is not currently available due to the inexistence of a small animal model. Recently, BALB/c mice were successfully infected with A. marginale, resulting in an acute and persistent anaplasmosis infection. Here, we designed a hybrid protein containing repeats of polypeptide 1a from major surface protein-1 complex (MSP1a) repeats and common epitopes of outer membrane proteins (OMPs) OMP7, OMP8 and OMP9 expressed in Escherichia coli. Our proof-of-concept assessed vaccinal effectiveness against a challenge with live bacteria. The MSP1a/OMP7/8/9 immunized BALB/C mice exhibited a strong reduction in rickettsemia and had no signs of anaplasmosis or hepatic lesions. In contrast, the non-immunized mice exhibited signs of anaplasmosis and a body weight loss associated with increases in monocyte and neutrophil counts. Furthermore, the non-immunized mice displayed atrophies with chronic inflammatory infiltrates in the spleen and increased binucleation and hydropic degeneration in the hepatocytes. Our findings demonstrated that immunization with our hybrid protein induced a strong reduction in rickettsemia and conferred protection against anaplasmosis. Therefore, given the strong evidence of the protective effect against anaplasmosis, hybrid protein designs are potential candidates for the rational design of vaccinal subunits.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29351812 PMCID: PMC5775529 DOI: 10.1186/s13567-018-0503-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Res ISSN: 0928-4249 Impact factor: 3.683
Figure 1Design of MSP1a/OMP7/8/9 protein. A The amino acid sequence of the MSP1a/OMP7/8/9 protein containing MSP1a repeats and two common sequences from OMP7, OMP8 and OMP9. The synthetic DNA was designed using a sequence (GenBank: JN564640.1) from the Anaplasma marginale St. Maries strain. B The 3D structure of the MSP1a/OMP7/8/9 protein was predicted using the i-TASSER algorithm [33]. According to the 3D prediction, the MSP1a repeats and two common sequences were exposed on the surface of the recombinant protein. C Each panel shows in detail the secondary structure of the MSP1a repeats (left panel) and two common sequences (middle and right panels).
Figure 2Immunogenicity of the hybrid protein MSP1a/OMP7/9. A Expression of the hybrid MSP1a/OMP7/9 protein after IPTG induction. Left panel: Supernatants of the E. coli strain DH5αF’IQ growth on 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Line 1: without IPTG at 0 h; line 2: after 8 h with IPTG; and line 3: 16 h after IPTG. MW—Molecular weight. B SDS-PAGE of hybrid MSP1a/OMP7/9 protein by affinity chromatography using Ni–NTA superflow 6xHis tagged (Qiagen, Brazil) (For detail, see “Materials and methods”). The purification was performed using an MCAC buffer (20 mM tris pH 7.9, 0.5% w/v NaCl and 10% v/v of glycerol), adjusted in pH 8.0 for binding, pH 6.0 for lavage and pH 3.0 for elution. C Western blotting (WB) with anti-HisG (Invitrogen) to characterize the molecular weight of the hybrid protein. D Western blotting (WB) of the hybrid protein to determine the antigenicity from anaplasmosis infected calf serum (left panel) and normal calf serum (right panel). E Immunogenicity of hybrid protein MSP1a/OMP7/9 after three immunization series emulsified with ISA adjuvant (MONTANIDE™ ISA 50 V2, Seppic, Brazil).
Comparison between signals and leukogram data between MSP1a/OMP7/8/9 protein-immunized mice and controls mice
| Immunized | Adjuvant | Non-immunized |
| Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symptoms, animals with symptom (Total of animals)a | |||||
| Opaque fur | 0 (5) | 5 (5) | 5 (5) | nd | 0 (5) |
| Ruffled fur | 0 (5) | 5 (5) | 5 (5) | nd | 0 (5) |
| Weight loss | 0 (5) | 0 (5) | 5 (5) | nd | 0 (5) |
| Lethargy | 0 (5) | 5 (5) | 5 (5) | nd | 0 (5) |
| Death | 0 (5) | 0 (5) | 2 (5) | nd | 0 (5) |
| Leukogramb | |||||
| Leucocytes | 5600.0 (529.2)* | 7266.7 (1814.8) | 7733.3 (1222.0)* |
| 3483.3 (2119.7) |
| Lymphocytes | 2053.5 (835.3) | 2640.0 (254.4) | 2242.7 (671.0) | 0.3967 | 2223.4 (778.2) |
| Monocytes | 130.0 (29.5)* | 180.7 (112.9) | 253.3 (12.2)* |
| 210.7 (27.2) |
| Neutrophils | 3318.7 (370.1)* | 4457.3 (1411.7) | 5104.0 (595.9)* |
| 2014.0 (1396.4) |
| Red cells, millions/mm3 | 5.6 (0.5) | 5.5 (0.9) | 6.4 (0.6) | 0.0631 | 5.6 (0.6) |
| Hemoglobin g/dL | 16.8 (1.4) | 16.7 (2.8) | 19.5 (1.9) | 0.1324 | 16.9 (1.8) |
| Hematocrit % | 50.3 (4.0) | 50.3 (8.3) | 58.7 (5.8) | 0.1303 | 50.7 (5.5) |
| MCV/mm3 | 90.3 (0.6) | 90.7 (0.6) | 91.0 (0.0) | 0.2605 | 90.3 (0.6) |
| MHV/mm3 | 30.0 (0.0) | 30.0 (0.0) | 30.0 (0.0) | 0.9999 | 30.0 (0.0) |
| MCHC/mm3 | 33.0 (0.0) | 33.0 (0.0) | 33.0 (0.0) | 0.9999 | 33.0 (0.0) |
| Platelets, millions/mm3 | 323.7 (97.0) | 403.3 (139.5) | 281.3 (138.6) | 0.6447 | 309.7 (45.6) |
| Creatinine, mg/dL | 1.2 (0.5) | 1.2 (0.4) | 1.2 (0.5) | 0.9854 | 1.1 (0.5) |
| Urea, mg/dL | 56.3 (33.6) | 55.0 (8.9) | 52.0 (18.5) | 0.9999 | 61.3 (20.4) |
nd: not done.
* significance found by Kruskal Wallis T-test.
aAnimals with symptom (Total of animals).
bFor leukogram data, only three animals have been used in each parameter. Mean (standard deviation).
Figure 3Challenge with the strain UFMG2 in mice. Three-week-old female BALB/c mice were divided into three groups. One group received three immunization series of the hybrid MSP1a/OMP7/9 protein mixed with the ISA adjuvant (immunized group; N = 5). The second group (N = 5) received only the ISA adjuvant (Adjuvant group), and the third group (N = 5) received PBS (non-immunized group; N = 5). The mice were challenged with 3 × 105 cells/mL of A. marginale UFMG2. The animals were observed for 42 days to measure weight loss, deaths, and signs, such as lethargy and ruffled and opaque fur (see Table 1). A Differences between related means of body weight followed for 42 days post-infection, the RM-ANOVA Test showed differences between the immunized and non-immunized mice showed differences between the immunized and non-immunized mice. The difference was evaluated by two-way RM ANOVA. The adjuvant group did not differ from either group (not shown). B The immunized group had 100% survival while 60% of non-immunized mice survived in Kaplan Meyer analysis. The adjuvant group did not differ from the immunized mice (not showing). C Morphological changes, such as cell destruction and pigmentation loss and featuring bacterial invasion in infected erythrocytes at 48 days post-infection. D Rickettsemia and A. marginale load and spherocytes counts were determined with blood smears stained with hematoxylin–eosin by optical microscopy [10].
Histological changes in the spleen of MSP1a/OMP7/8/9 protein-immunized mice and controls mice
| LIVER | SPLEEN | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydrotropic degeneration | White pulp hyperplasia | Periarteriolar hyperplasia | Follicular hyperplasia | |||||
| 95% CI |
| 95% CI |
| 95% CI |
| 95% CI |
| |
| Non-immunized vs. immunized | 0.2695 to 1.731 | ** | −2.397 to −0.9361 | ** | −2.064 to −0.6028 | ** | −2.397 to −0.9361 | ** |
| Non-immunized vs. adjuvant | −0.7305 to 0.7305 | ns | −0.7305 to 0.7305 | ns | −0.7305 to 0.7305 | ns | −1.397 to 0.06387 | ns |
ns: not significant.
** p < 0.005.
Figure 4Liver and spleen modifications after the challenge. All groups were challenged with 3 × 105 cells/mL A. marginale UFMG2. A The liver histopathology shows hepatocytes binucleation (arrow head) and hydropic degeneration (arrow). B The spleen analysis indicates follicular hyperplasia in the white pulp (asterisk). In contrast, the adjuvant and non-immunized group showed lymphoid follicle atrophies (arrow head). Hematoxylin and eosin staining and scale bar = 100 μm.