Literature DB >> 29351691

OUT-OF-FIELD DOSES IN CHILDREN TREATED FOR LARGE ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS USING HYPOFRACTIONATED GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY AND INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY.

Marijke De Saint-Hubert1, Marija Majer2, Hrvoje Hršak3, Zdravko Heinrich3, Željka Kneževic2, Saveta Miljanic2, Paulina Porwol4, Liliana Stolarczyk5, Filip Vanhavere1, Roger M Harrison6.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure out-of-field organ doses in two anthropomorphic child phantoms for the treatment of large brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) using hypofractionated gamma knife (GK) radiosurgery and to compare these with an alternative treatment using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Target volume was identical in size and shape in all cases. Radiophotoluminescent (RPL), thermoluminescent (TL) and optically stimulated luminescent (OSL) dosimeters were used for out-of-field dosimetry during GK treatment and a good agreement within 1-2% between results was shown. In addition, the use of multiple dosimetry systems strengthens the reliability of the findings. The number of GK isocentres was confirmed to be important for the magnitude of out-of-field doses. Measured GK doses for the same distance from the target, when expressed per target dose and isocentre, were comparable in both phantoms. GK out-of-field doses averaged for both phantoms were evaluated to be 120 mGy/Gy for eyes then sharply reduced to 20 mGy/Gy for mandible and slowly reduced up to 0.8 mGy/Gy for testes. Taking into account the fractionation regimen used to treat AVM patients, the total treatment organ doses to the out-of-field organs were calculated and compared with IMRT. The eyes were better spared with GK whilst for more distant organs doses were up to a factor of 2.8 and 4 times larger for GK compared to IMRT in 5-year and 10-year old phantoms, respectively. Presented out-of-field dose values are specific for the investigated AVM case, phantoms and treatment plans used for GK and IMRT, but provide useful information about out-of-field dose levels and emphasise their importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29351691     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  4 in total

1.  High CT doses return to the agenda.

Authors:  W Rühm; R M Harrison
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Out-of-Field Doses Produced by a Proton Scanning Beam Inside Pediatric Anthropomorphic Phantoms and Their Comparison With Different Photon Modalities.

Authors:  Željka Knežević; Liliana Stolarczyk; Iva Ambrožová; Miguel Á Caballero-Pacheco; Marie Davídková; Marijke De Saint-Hubert; Carles Domingo; Kinga Jeleń; Renata Kopeć; Dawid Krzempek; Marija Majer; Saveta Miljanić; Natalia Mojżeszek; Maite Romero-Expósito; Immaculada Martínez-Rovira; Roger M Harrison; Paweł Olko
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Neutron Radiation Dose Measurements in a Scanning Proton Therapy Room: Can Parents Remain Near Their Children During Treatment?

Authors:  Vladimir Mares; Jad Farah; Marijke De Saint-Hubert; Szymon Domański; Carles Domingo; Martin Dommert; Magdalena Kłodowska; Katarzyna Krzempek; Michał Kuć; Immaculada Martínez-Rovira; Edyta Michaś; Natalia Mojżeszek; Łukasz Murawski; Ondrej Ploc; Maite Romero-Expósito; Marco Tisi; François Trompier; Olivier Van Hoey; Laurent Van Ryckeghem; Marek Wielunski; Roger M Harrison; Liliana Stolarczyk; Pawel Olko
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Out-of-field dose in stereotactic radiotherapy for paediatric patients.

Authors:  Lachlan Garrett; Nicholas Hardcastle; Adam Yeo; Peta Lonski; Rick Franich; Tomas Kron
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-06-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.