| Literature DB >> 29351230 |
Xin Zhao1,2,3,4, Jia-Le Song5, Ruokun Yi6,7,8,9, Guijie Li10,11,12,13, Peng Sun14,15,16,17, Kun-Young Park18,19, Huayi Suo20.
Abstract
Kudingcha is a traditional Chinese tea, and insect tea is a special drink produced by the metabolism of insect larvae using the raw Kuding tea. Insect tea polyphenols (ITP) and its raw tea (Kuding tea) polyphenols (KTP) are high-purity polyphenols extracted by centrifuge precipitation. The present study was designed to compare the antioxidative effects of insect tea polyphenols (ITP) and its raw tea (Kuding tea) polyphenols (KTP) on d-galactose-induced oxidation in Kunming (KM) mice. KM mice were treated with ITP (200 mg/kg) and KTP (200 mg/kg) by gavage, and vitamin C (VC, 200 mg/kg) was also used as a positive control by gavage. After determination in serum, liver and spleen, ITP-treated mice showed higher superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), and glutathione (GSH) activities and lower nitric oxide (NO), malonaldehyde (MDA) activities than VC-treated mice, KTP-treated mice and untreated oxidation mice (control group). By H&E section observation, the mice induced by d-galactose-induced oxidation showed more changes than normal mice, and oxidative damage appeared in liver and spleen tissues; ITP, VC and KTP improved oxidative damage of liver and spleen tissues, and the effects of ITP were better than VC and KTP. Using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and western blot experiments, it was observed that ITP could increase the mRNA and protein expression of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), manganese superoxide dismutase (Mn-SOD), cupro/zinc superoxide dismutase (Cu/Zn-SOD), catalase (CAT), heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), nuclear factor erythroid 2 related factor 2 (Nrf2), gamma glutamylcysteine synthetase (γ-GCS), and NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) and reduce inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression in liver and spleen tissues compared to the control group. These effects were stronger than for VC and KTP. Both ITP and KTP had good antioxidative effects, and after the transformation of insects, the effects of ITP were better than that of KTP and even better than VC. Thus, ITP can be used as an antioxidant and anti-ageing functional food.Entities:
Keywords: Kuding tea; antioxidation; insect tea; mice; polyphenol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29351230 PMCID: PMC6017035 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23010204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Standard curve of chlorogenic acid.
Polyphenol contents of KTP and ITP.
| Group | OD747 Value | Polyphenols (μg) | Polyphenol Extract (μg) | Polyphenols Content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KTP | 0.172 ± 0.03 | 35.69 ± 1.02 | 50.00 ± 0.00 | 71.38 ± 1.06 |
| ITP | 0.168 ± 0.04 | 34.91 ± 0.82 | 50.00 ± 0.00 | 69.82 ± 1.11 |
Values presented are mean ± standard deviation. KTP: Kuding tea polyphenols; ITP: Insect tea polyphenols.
Activities of NO, SOD, GSH-Px, GSH and MDA in serum of mice.
| Group | NO | SOD | GSH-Px | GSH | MDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 22.52 ± 1.08 e | 267.52 ± 9.45 a | 169.12 ± 4.32 a | 31.21 ± 2.71 a | 7.08 ± 0.42 e |
| Control | 69.71 ± 2.21 a | 122.35 ± 6.71 e | 101.20 ± 2.08 e | 14.35 ± 1.89 e | 25.12 ± 1.32 a |
| VC | 40.52 ± 1.56 c | 174.50 ± 7.46 c | 133.25 ± 2.15 c | 20.25 ± 1.75 c | 13.12 ± 0.62 c |
| KTP | 50.85 ± 1.44 b | 155.69 ± 6.03 d | 118.74 ± 2.20 d | 17.35 ± 1.26 d | 17.42 ± 0.49 b |
| ITP | 36.12 ± 1.32 d | 208.64 ± 6.42 b | 149.45 ± 2.33 b | 25.33 ± 2.03 b | 9.36 ± 0.43 d |
Values presented are mean ± standard deviation (N = 10/group). a–e Mean values with different letters over same column represent significant differences (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test. VC: vitamin C (200 mg/kg body weight); KTP: Kuding tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight); ITP: Insect tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight).
Activities of NO, SOD, GSH-Px, GSH and MDA in liver of mice.
| Group | NO | SOD | GSH-Px | GSH | MDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 3.85 ± 0.19 e | 98.78 ± 6.20 a | 178.92 ± 5.69 a | 7.33 ± 0.41 a | 2.36 ± 0.12 e |
| Control | 9.78 ± 0.39 a | 36.52 ± 2.39 e | 88.15 ± 3.56 e | 2.58 ± 0.25 e | 8.87 ± 0.35 a |
| VC | 6.32 ± 0.23 c | 62.12 ± 3.85 c | 126.20 ± 3.98 d | 5.10 ± 0.33 d | 5.06 ± 0.30 c |
| KTP | 7.71 ± 0.18 b | 45.12 ± 2.48 d | 111.25 ± 3.25 c | 4.04 ± 0.19 c | 6.12 ± 0.24 b |
| ITP | 5.05 ± 0.22 d | 79.82 ± 4.75 b | 145.12 ± 4.56 b | 6.21 ± 0.22 b | 4.23 ± 0.17 d |
Values presented are mean ± standard deviation (N = 10/group). a–e Mean values with different letters over same column represent significant differences (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test. VC: vitamin C (200 mg/kg body weight); KTP: Kuding tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight); ITP: Insect tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight).
Activities of NO, SOD, GSH-Px, GSH and MDA in spleen of mice.
| Group | NO | SOD | GSH-Px | GSH | MDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 1.87 ± 0.12 e | 63.15 ± 3.75 a | 107.23 ± 4.56 a | 5.41 ± 0.24 a | 1.12 ± 0.08 e |
| Control | 6.32 ± 0.23 a | 21.65 ± 2.21 e | 42.18 ± 3.21 e | 1.79 ± 0.14 e | 4.32 ± 0.12 a |
| VC | 3.69 ± 0.22 c | 40.58 ± 2.11 c | 77.12 ± 2.42 d | 3.87 ± 0.20 d | 2.23 ± 0.14 c |
| KTP | 4.41 ± 0.19 b | 32.01 ± 2.33 d | 62.10 ± 3.87 c | 3.11 ± 0.16 c | 2.79 ± 0.09 b |
| ITP | 2.48 ± 0.21 d | 52.17 ± 2.36 b | 88.17 ± 4.02 b | 4.42 ± 0.21 b | 1.87 ± 0.10 d |
Values presented are mean ± standard deviation (N = 10/group). a–e Mean values with different letters over same column represent significant differences (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test. VC: vitamin C (200 mg/kg body weight); KTP: Kuding tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight); ITP: Insect tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight).
Figure 2H&E pathological observation of liver in mice. Magnification 100×. VC: vitamin C (200 mg/kg body weight); KTP: Kuding tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight); ITP: insect tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight).
Figure 3H&E pathological observation of spleen in mice. Magnification 100×. VC: vitamin C (200 mg/kg body weight); KTP: Kuding tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight); ITP: insect tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight).
Figure 4Expression of mRNA (A) and protein (B) for nNOS, eNOS and iNOS in liver of mice. a–e Mean values with different letters in the same bar represent significant differences (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple-range test. VC: vitamin C (200 mg/kg body weight); KTP: Kuding tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight); ITP: insect tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight).
Figure 5Expression of mRNA (A) and protein (B) for nNOS, eNOS and iNOS in spleen of mice. a–e Mean values with different letters in the same bar represent significant differences (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple-range test. VC: vitamin C (200 mg/kg body weight); KTP: Kuding tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight); ITP: insect tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight).
Figure 6Expression of mRNA (A) and protein (B) for Mn-SOD, Cu/Zn-SOD and CAT in liver of mice. a–e Mean values with different letters in the same bar represent significant differences (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple-range test. VC: vitamin C (200 mg/kg body weight); KTP: Kuding tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight); ITP: insect tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight).
Figure 7Expression of mRNA (A) and protein (B) for Mn-SOD, Cu/Zn-SOD and CAT in spleen of mice. a–e Mean values with different letters in the same bar represent significant differences (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple-range test. VC: vitamin C (200 mg/kg body weight); KTP: Kuding tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight); ITP: insect tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight).
Figure 8Expression of mRNA (A) and protein (B) for HO-1 and Nrf2 in liver of mice. a–e Mean values with different letters in the same bar represent significant differences (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple-range test. VC: vitamin C (200 mg/kg body weight); KTP: Kuding tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight); ITP: insect tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight).
Figure 9Expression of mRNA (A) and protein (B) for HO-1 and Nrf2 in spleen of mice. a–e Mean values with different letters in the same bar represent significant differences (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple-range test. VC: vitamin C (200 mg/kg body weight); KTP: Kuding tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight); ITP: insect tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight).
Figure 10Expression of mRNA (A) and protein (B) for γ-GCS and NQO1 in liver of mice. a–e Mean values with different letters in the same bar represent significant differences (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple-range test. VC: vitamin C (200 mg/kg body weight); KTP: Kuding tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight); ITP: insect tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight).
Figure 11Expression of mRNA (A) and protein (B) for γ-GCS and NQO1 in spleen of mice. a–e Mean values with different letters in the same bar represent significant differences (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple-range test. VC: vitamin C (200 mg/kg body weight); KTP: Kuding tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight); ITP: insect tea polyphenols (200 mg/kg body weight).
Sequences of qPCR primers used in this study.
| Gene Name | Sequence |
|---|---|
| nNOS | Forward: 5′-ACGGCAAACTGCACAAAGC-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-CGTTCTCTGAATACGGGTTGTTG-3′ | |
| eNOS | Forward: 5′-TCAGCCATCACAGTGTTCCC-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-ATAGCCCGCATAGCGTATCAG-3′ | |
| iNOS | Forward: 5′-GTTCTCAGCCCAACAATACAAGA-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-GTGGACGGGTCGATGTCAC-3′ | |
| Mn-SOD | Forward: 5′-CAGACCTGCCTTACGACTATGG-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-CTCGGTGGCGTTGAGATTGTT-3′ | |
| Gu/Zn-SOD | Forward: 5′-AACCAGTTGTGTTGTCAGGAC-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-CCACCATGTTTCTTAGAGTGAGG-3′ | |
| CAT | Forward: 5′- GGAGGCGGGAACCCAATAG-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′- GTGTGCCATCTCGTCAGTGAA-3′ | |
| HO-1 | Forward: 5′-ACAGATGGCGTCACTTCG-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-TGAGGACCCACTGGAGGA-3′ | |
| Nrf2 | Forward: 5′-CAGTGCTCCTATGCGTGAA-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-GCGGCTTGAATGTTTGTC-3′ | |
| γ-GCS | Forward: 5′-GCACATCTACCACGCAGTCA-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-CAGAGTCTCAAGAACATCGCC-3′ | |
| NQO1 | Forward: 5′-CTTTAGGGTCGTCTTGGC-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-CAATCAGGGCTCTTCTCG-3′ | |
| GAPDH | Forward: 5′-AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-GGGGTCGTTGATGGCAACA-3′ |
Figure 12The observed effects in this study.