OBJECTIVES: A previous definition of adolescent asthma self-management was derived from interviews with clinicians/researchers and published literature; however, it did not incorporate perspectives of teens or parents. Therefore, we conducted in-depth interviews with teens and parents and synthesized present findings with the prior analysis to develop a more encompassing definition and model. METHODS: Focal concepts were qualitatively extracted from 14-day self-management voice-diaries (n = 14) and 1-hour interviews (n = 42) with teens and parents (28 individuals) along with concepts found in the previous clinical/research oriented analysis. Conceptual structure and relationships were identified and key findings synthesized to develop a revised definition and model of adolescent asthma self-management. RESULTS: There were two primary self-management constructs: processes of self-management and tasks of self-management. Self-management was defined as the iterative process of assessing, deciding, and responding to specific situations in order to achieve personally important outcomes. Clinically relevant asthma self-management tasks included monitoring asthma, managing active issues through pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic strategies, preventing future issues, and communicating with others as needed. Self-management processes were reciprocally influenced by intrapersonal factors (both cognitive and physical), interpersonal factors (family, social and physical environments), and personally relevant asthma and non-asthma outcomes. CONCLUSION: This is the first definition of asthma self-management incorporating teen, parent, clinician, and researcher perspectives, which suggests that self-management processes and behaviors are influenced by individually variable personal and interpersonal factors, and are driven by personally important outcomes. Clinicians and researchers should investigate teens' symptom perceptions, medication beliefs, current approaches to symptom management, relevant outcomes, and personal priorities.
OBJECTIVES: A previous definition of adolescent asthma self-management was derived from interviews with clinicians/researchers and published literature; however, it did not incorporate perspectives of teens or parents. Therefore, we conducted in-depth interviews with teens and parents and synthesized present findings with the prior analysis to develop a more encompassing definition and model. METHODS: Focal concepts were qualitatively extracted from 14-day self-management voice-diaries (n = 14) and 1-hour interviews (n = 42) with teens and parents (28 individuals) along with concepts found in the previous clinical/research oriented analysis. Conceptual structure and relationships were identified and key findings synthesized to develop a revised definition and model of adolescent asthma self-management. RESULTS: There were two primary self-management constructs: processes of self-management and tasks of self-management. Self-management was defined as the iterative process of assessing, deciding, and responding to specific situations in order to achieve personally important outcomes. Clinically relevant asthma self-management tasks included monitoring asthma, managing active issues through pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic strategies, preventing future issues, and communicating with others as needed. Self-management processes were reciprocally influenced by intrapersonal factors (both cognitive and physical), interpersonal factors (family, social and physical environments), and personally relevant asthma and non-asthma outcomes. CONCLUSION: This is the first definition of asthma self-management incorporating teen, parent, clinician, and researcher perspectives, which suggests that self-management processes and behaviors are influenced by individually variable personal and interpersonal factors, and are driven by personally important outcomes. Clinicians and researchers should investigate teens' symptom perceptions, medication beliefs, current approaches to symptom management, relevant outcomes, and personal priorities.
Authors: Gregory K Fritz; Elizabeth L McQuaid; Sheryl J Kopel; Ronald Seifer; Robert B Klein; Daphne Koinis Mitchell; Cynthia A Esteban; Jose Rodriguez-Santana; Angel Colon; Maria Alvarez; Glorisa Canino Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Simone Holley; Ruth Morris; Rebecca Knibb; Sue Latter; Christina Liossi; Frances Mitchell; Graham Roberts Journal: Pediatr Pulmonol Date: 2016-10-07
Authors: Sandra R Wilson; Cynthia S Rand; Michael D Cabana; Michael B Foggs; Jill S Halterman; Lynn Olson; William M Vollmer; Rosalind J Wright; Virginia Taggart Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Emily J Bailey; Christopher J Cates; Sue G Kruske; Peter S Morris; Anne B Chang; Ngiare Brown Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2009-01-21
Authors: Tanya Wallace-Farquharson; Hyekyun Rhee; Anne O Oguntoye; Jennifer Harrison Elder; Miriam O Ezenwa; David Fedele; Laurie Duckworth; Diana J Wilkie Journal: J Asthma Date: 2022-03-14
Authors: Michelle Nichols; Ronald Teufel; Sarah Miller; Mohan Madisetti; Christine San Giovanni; Katherine Chike-Harris; Lacy Jones; Margaret Prentice; Kenneth Ruggiero; Teresa Kelechi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jennifer R Mammen; Kelsey Turgeon; Ashley Philibert; Judith D Schoonmaker; James Java; Jill Halterman; Marc N Berliant; Amber Crowley; Marina Reznik; Jonathan M Feldman; Robert J Fortuna; Kimberly Arcoleo Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2020-10-18 Impact factor: 5.018