Mechelle D Claridy1, Melissa M Hudson2,3, Lee Caplan1, Pauline A Mitby4, Wendy Leisenring5, Selina A Smith6, Leslie L Robison2, Ann C Mertens7. 1. Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee. 3. Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee. 4. Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 5. Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. 6. Institute of Public & Preventive Medicine, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, Georgia. 7. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To assess where, when, and why survivors of childhood cancer seek health information. PROCEDURE: Data from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) cohort (n = 1386) and Health Information National Trends Survey (n = 2385) were analyzed to determine the health information seeking strategies of childhood cancer survivors. Descriptive frequencies, χ2 analyses, t-tests, and multivariable logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: To seek health-related information for themselves, 54% (n = 742) of the childhood survivors reported using the Internet in the past 12 months, compared to 45% of the general population (adjusted OR: 2.76; 95% CI: 2.40-3.19). Childhood cancer survivors who used the Internet for health information were more likely to be female, between the ages of 18-34, have received some college education or be a college graduate, and report being in poor health. Although survivors were less likely than the general population to trust health information from the Internet (P < 0.01), they indicated that they would like a secure website that uses information from their medical records to provide individualized health-related information. CONCLUSION: The use of the Internet to access health information among the childhood cancer survivors was over 50%. Information on late effects was a high priority for most survivors, as was their interest in websites related to late effects and a website on patient information tailored to personal situations. Identification of factors associated with searching the Internet for cancer information may provide direction for development of effective cancer communication interventions for this at-risk population.
BACKGROUND: To assess where, when, and why survivors of childhood cancer seek health information. PROCEDURE: Data from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) cohort (n = 1386) and Health Information National Trends Survey (n = 2385) were analyzed to determine the health information seeking strategies of childhood cancer survivors. Descriptive frequencies, χ2 analyses, t-tests, and multivariable logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: To seek health-related information for themselves, 54% (n = 742) of the childhood survivors reported using the Internet in the past 12 months, compared to 45% of the general population (adjusted OR: 2.76; 95% CI: 2.40-3.19). Childhood cancer survivors who used the Internet for health information were more likely to be female, between the ages of 18-34, have received some college education or be a college graduate, and report being in poor health. Although survivors were less likely than the general population to trust health information from the Internet (P < 0.01), they indicated that they would like a secure website that uses information from their medical records to provide individualized health-related information. CONCLUSION: The use of the Internet to access health information among the childhood cancer survivors was over 50%. Information on late effects was a high priority for most survivors, as was their interest in websites related to late effects and a website on patient information tailored to personal situations. Identification of factors associated with searching the Internet for cancer information may provide direction for development of effective cancer communication interventions for this at-risk population.
Authors: Ann C Mertens; Kelly L Cotter; Barbara M Foster; Brad J Zebrack; Melissa M Hudson; Debra Eshelman; Lauren Loftis; Margaret Sozio; Kevin C Oeffinger Journal: Health Policy Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: David E Nelson; Gary L Kreps; Bradford W Hesse; Robert T Croyle; Gordon Willis; Neeraj K Arora; Barbara K Rimer; K V Viswanath; Neil Weinstein; Sara Alden Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2004 Sep-Oct
Authors: Diane L Elliot; Susan J Lindemulder; Linn Goldberg; Diane D Stadler; Jennifer Smith Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Melissa M Hudson; Kirsten K Ness; James G Gurney; Daniel A Mulrooney; Wassim Chemaitilly; Kevin R Krull; Daniel M Green; Gregory T Armstrong; Kerri A Nottage; Kendra E Jones; Charles A Sklar; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Leslie L Robison Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-06-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sebastiaan L Knijnenburg; Leontien C Kremer; Cor van den Bos; Katja I Braam; Monique W M Jaspers Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Kevin C Oeffinger; Ann C Mertens; Charles A Sklar; Toana Kawashima; Melissa M Hudson; Anna T Meadows; Debra L Friedman; Neyssa Marina; Wendy Hobbie; Nina S Kadan-Lottick; Cindy L Schwartz; Wendy Leisenring; Leslie L Robison Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-10-12 Impact factor: 176.079
Authors: Melissa M Hudson; Ann C Mertens; Yutaka Yasui; Wendy Hobbie; Hegang Chen; James G Gurney; Mark Yeazel; Christopher J Recklitis; Neyssa Marina; Leslie R Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-09-24 Impact factor: 157.335
Authors: Sachiko M Oshima; Sarah D Tait; Samantha M Thomas; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Kearston Ingraham; Nadine J Barrett; E Shelley Hwang Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Rose Calixte; Argelis Rivera; Olutobi Oridota; William Beauchamp; Marlene Camacho-Rivera Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-19 Impact factor: 3.390