| Literature DB >> 29350207 |
Zhong Ling Zhuo, Hai Peng Xian, Yan Long, Chang Liu, Yuan Yuan Sun, Yin Ting Ma, Hua Gao, Jing Zhong Zhao, Xiao Tao Zhao1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between CYP2C19 and ABCB1 polymorphisms and clopidogrel resistance (CR) in patients with cardiovascular disease in Beijing district.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29350207 PMCID: PMC5864806 DOI: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.8097
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anatol J Cardiol ISSN: 2149-2263 Impact factor: 1.596
Baseline characteristics of the experimental group patients according to the CYP2C19*2 and *3 genotype
| CYP2C19 | CYP2C19 | CYP2C19 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| *1/*1 | *1/*2, *1/*3 | *2/*2, *2/*3, *3/*3 | ||
| (n=38) | (n=53) | (n=10) | ||
| Age, years | 69.71±13.44 | 69.62±11.20 | 64.30±15.38 | 0.440 |
| Male (%) | 8 (21.1%) | 17 (32.1%) | 3 (30.0%) | 0.512 |
| BMI[ | 23.18±7.89 | 24.52±4.74 | 22.54±9.48 | 0.560 |
| Smoking status | 0.125 | |||
| Non-smoker | 30 (78.9%) | 48 (90.6%) | 10 (100%) | |
| Ex-smoker | 4 (10.5%) | 3 (5.7%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Habitual smoker | 4 (10.5%) | 2 (3.8%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Hypertension | 24 (63.2%) | 29 (54.7%) | 4 (40.0%) | 0.402 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 4 (10.5%) | 10 (18.9%) | 3 (30.0%) | 0.297 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 13 (34.2%) | 22 (41.5%) | 4 (40.0%) | 0.782 |
| ACEI[ | 19 (50.0%) | 20 (37.7%) | 4 (40.0%) | 0.477 |
| ARB[ | 28 (73.7%) | 39 (73.6%) | 7 (70.0%) | 0.935 |
| Calcium-channel blocker | 25 (65.8%) | 36 (67.9%) | 7 (70.0%) | 0.982 |
| β-receptor blocker | 30 (78.9%) | 46 (86.8%) | 8 (80.0%) | 0.579 |
| Statins | 35 (92.1%) | 51 (96.2%) | 10 (100.0%) | 0.546 |
| Proton-pump inhibitor | 22 (57.9%) | 30 (56.6%) | 4 (40.0%) | 0.538 |
| Aspirin | 10 (26.3%) | 13 (24.5%) | 3 (30.0%) | 0.941 |
- body mass index;
- angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor;
- angiotensin receptor blocker
Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to exclude other potential confounding factors between genotypes and the efficacy of clopidogrel treatment.
Demographic characteristics and baseline data between three genotypes of CYP2C19 groups were well balanced
Genotype frequency of the experimental group
| Percentage (%) | Wild-type homozygotes | Genotype | Mutation homozygous |
|---|---|---|---|
| CYP2C19*2 | 45 (44.45) | 49 (48.51) | 7 (6.93) |
| CYP2C19*3 | 91 (90.10) | 10 (9.90) | 0 |
| CYP2C19*4 | 101 (100.00) | 0 | 0 |
| CYP2C19*5 | 101 (100.00) | 0 | 0 |
| CYP2C19*17 | 100 (99.01) | 1 (0.99) | 0 |
| ABCB1 | 39 (38.61) | 50 (49.50) | 12 (11.88) |
Genotype frequency of the control group
| Percentage (%) | Wild-type homozygotes | Genotype | Mutation homozygous |
|---|---|---|---|
| CYP2C19*2 | 106 (47.32) | 101 (45.09) | 17 (7.59) |
| CYP2C19*3 | 208 (92.86) | 16 (7.14) | 0 |
| CYP2C19*4 | 223 (99.55) | 1 (0.45) | 0 |
| CYP2C19*5 | 224 (100.00) | 0 | 0 |
| CYP2C19*17 | 219 (97.77) | 5 (2.23) | 0 |
| ABCB1 | 81 (36.16) | 104 (46.43) | 39 (17.41) |
Figure 1Mass spectrograms for genotypes CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*3, CYP2C19*4, CYP2C19*5, CYP2C19*17, and ABCB1
Figure 2CYP2C19*2 or *3 genotypes and ADP- induced platelet inhibition rates
The relationship between CYP2C19*2 or *3 genotypes and CR
| Metabolizes | Number | Percentage of entire group | Number of CR[ | Percentage of CR in entire group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild-type homozygotes | *1/*1 | 38 | 37.62% | 7 | 18.42% |
| Heterozygous | *1/*2 | 46 | 45.54% | 15 | 32.61% |
| *1/*3 | 7 | 6.93% | 2 | 28.57% | |
| Total | 53 | 52.48% | 17 | 32.08% | |
| Mutation homozygous | *2/*2 | 7 | 6.93% | 4 | 57.14% |
| *2/*3 | 3 | 2.97% | 2 | 66.67% | |
| *3/*3 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Total | 10 | 9.90% | 6 | 60.00% |
- clopidogrel resistance