Literature DB >> 29349696

Assessing priming for prosodic representations: Speaking rate, intonational phrase boundaries, and pitch accenting.

Kristen M Tooley1, Agnieszka E Konopka2, Duane G Watson3.   

Abstract

Recent work in the literature on prosody presents a puzzle: Some aspects of prosody can be primed in production (e.g., speech rate), but others cannot (e.g., intonational phrase boundaries, or IPBs). In three experiments we aimed to replicate these effects and identify the source of this dissociation. In Experiment 1 we investigated how speaking rate and the presence of an intonational boundary in a prime sentence presented auditorily affect the production of these aspects of prosody in a target sentence presented visually. Analyses of the targets revealed that participants' speaking rates, but not their production of boundaries, were affected by the priming manipulation. Experiment 2 verified whether speakers are more sensitive to IPBs when the boundaries provide disambiguating information, and in this different context replicated Experiment 1 in showing no IPB priming. Experiment 3 tested whether speakers are sensitive to another aspect of prosody-pitch accenting-in a similar paradigm. Again, we found no evidence that this manipulation affected pitch accenting in target sentences. These findings are consistent with earlier research and suggest that aspects of prosody that are paralinguistic (like speaking rate) may be more amenable to priming than are linguistic aspects of prosody (such as phrase boundaries and pitch accenting).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intonational phrase boundary; Pitch accenting; Priming; Prosody; Speaking rate

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29349696      PMCID: PMC5943085          DOI: 10.3758/s13421-018-0789-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  28 in total

1.  Perceptual normalization for speaking rate. II: Effects of signal discontinuities.

Authors:  J R Sawusch; R S Newman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-02

2.  Why is conversation so easy?

Authors:  Simon Garrod; Martin J Pickering
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: a functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech.

Authors:  Matthew Aylett; Alice Turk
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.500

4.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation.

Authors:  S E Brennan; H H Clark
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.

Authors:  D E Meyer; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-10

7.  Creation of prosody during sentence production.

Authors:  F Ferreira
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Spatial perspective-taking in conversation.

Authors:  M F Schober
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1993-04

9.  Effect of speaking rate on vowel formant movements.

Authors:  T Gay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  In dialogue with an avatar, language behavior is identical to dialogue with a human partner.

Authors:  Evelien Heyselaar; Peter Hagoort; Katrien Segaert
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.