Literature DB >> 22956070

Prognostic factor analysis in patients with metastatic spine disease depending on surgery and conservative treatment: review of 577 cases.

Byung Ho Lee1, Tae-Hwan Kim, Hyun-Soo Chong, Eun-Soo Moon, Jin-Oh Park, Hak-Sun Kim, Seung-Hyun Kim, Hwan-Mo Lee, Yong-jin Cho, Keung Nyun Kim, Seong-Hwan Moon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To date, skillful medical management and advanced surgical techniques have provided increased quality of life with less postoperative morbidity in patients with spinal metastasis. We assessed the survival of patients with spinal metastasis according to two treatment modalities: surgery and conservative treatment.
METHODS: From 2005 to 2010, a total of 577 patients (200 surgery, 377 conservative treatment) who had spinal metastasis were enrolled. Prognostic factors and survival were assessed by Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses in patients receiving either surgery or conservative treatment.
RESULTS: The mean age was 59.7 (range 21-87) years in the surgery group and 59.9 (range 28-90) years in the conservative treatment group. The major primary cancers were of lung, liver, and colorectal origin in the surgery group and lung, liver, and breast in the conservative group. The mean±SD Tokuhashi score in the surgery group was 8.12±3.09 and in the conservative group was 8.0±2.8 (not significant). The hazard ratio of the primary cancer group ranged from 1.870 to 3.217 compared to that of the most favorable primary cancer group in all patients. Survival was affected significantly by sex, adjuvant therapy, and postoperative survival in the surgery group and by clinical symptom, metastasis to major internal organ, and primary cancer origin in the conservative group.
CONCLUSIONS: With this retrospective review of 577 cases of spinal metastasis, different prognostic factors depending on the treatment modality were discovered. Hence, consideration of these factors depending on the treatment modality could be helpful in treating patients with spinal metastasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22956070     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2644-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  16 in total

1.  Surgical treatment for metastases of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Farzam Vazifehdan; Vasilios G Karantzoulis; Vasilios G Igoumenou
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-21

Review 2.  [Prognosis scores for spinal metastases].

Authors:  N H von der Höh; J Gulow; S K Tschöke; A Völker; C E Heyde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Minimal-invasive stabilization and circumferential spinal cord decompression in metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC).

Authors:  Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt; Reginald Knight; Jörg Beyerlein; Roland Gessler; Lothar Wiesner; Christian Schaefer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Micro-invasive surgery combined with intraoperative radiotherapy for the treatment of spinal metastasis.

Authors:  Keng Chen; Lin Huang; Zhaopeng Cai; Juntian Shi; Kaiyun You; Huiyong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Basic concepts in metal work failure after metastatic spine tumour surgery.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar; Ravish Patel; Anshuja Charvi Wadhwa; Aravind Kumar; Helena Maria Milavec; Dhiraj Sonawane; Gurpal Singh; Lorin Michael Benneker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Which one is a valuable surrogate for predicting survival between Tomita and Tokuhashi scores in patients with spinal metastases? A meta-analysis for diagnostic test accuracy and individual participant data analysis.

Authors:  Chang-Hyun Lee; Chun Kee Chung; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Ki-jeong Kim; Chi Heon Kim; Seung-Jae Hyun; Hyun-Jib Kim; Sang Ryong Jeon; Ung-Kyu Chang; Sun-Ho Lee; Seong-Hwan Moon; Haroon Majeed; Dan Zhang; Gwenaelle Gravis; Christine Wibmer; Naresh Kumar; Kyung Yun Moon; Jin Hoon Park; Emeline Tabouret; Stephane Fuentes
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Moderate precision of prognostic scoring systems in a consecutive, prospective cohort of 544 patients with metastatic spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Søren Schmidt Morgen; Dennis Hallager Nielsen; Claus Falck Larsen; Rikke Søgaard; Svend Aage Engelholm; Benny Dahl
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Treatment and outcomes of 28 patients with spinal metastasis from gynecological cancer.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Chenglong Zhao; Shaohui He; Tianqi Fan; Wei Xu; Cheng Yang; Tielong Liu; Jianru Xiao
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Factors Associated with Life Expectancy in Patients with Metastatic Spine Disease from Adenocarcinoma of the Lung.

Authors:  C Rory Goodwin; Mohamed H Khattab; Eric W Sankey; Benjamin D Elder; Thomas A Kosztowski; Rachel Sarabia-Estrada; Ali Bydon; Timothy F Witham; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-06-05

10.  A preliminary study of the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation with percutaneous kyphoplasty for thoracolumbar vertebral metastatic tumor treatment.

Authors:  Longpo Zheng; Zhengqi Chen; Mengxiong Sun; Hui Zeng; Dongqing Zuo; Yingqi Hua; Zhengdong Cai
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-04-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.