Literature DB >> 29349566

Performance Improvement in Head and Neck Cancer.

Carol M Lewis1, Randal S Weber2.   

Abstract

Performance improvement requires establishing a platform to set benchmarks and monitor the quality of care provided through quality indicators and metrics. This has long been recognized as critical to overall quality improvement and more recently, has become federally mandated. Here, we review recent studies evaluating performance in head and neck cancer care, from those spanning all phases of head and neck cancer care to others focused on head and neck surgical performance, including both national and departmental/institutional efforts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Head and neck cancer; Performance improvement; Performance metrics; Quality improvement; Surgical quality

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29349566     DOI: 10.1007/s11912-018-0655-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3790            Impact factor:   5.075


  35 in total

1.  Short- and long-term outcomes of laryngeal cancer care in the elderly.

Authors:  Christine G Gourin; Heather M Starmer; Robert J Herbert; Kevin D Frick; Arlene A Forastiere; David W Eisele; Harry Quon
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement.

Authors:  Jan Mainz
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 3.  Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; David M Shahian; Justin B Dimick; Samuel R G Finlayson; David R Flum; Clifford Y Ko; Bruce Lee Hall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Association of Clinical Risk Factors and Postoperative Complications With Unplanned Hospital Readmission After Head and Neck Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Andrés M Bur; Jason A Brant; Carolyn L Mulvey; Elizabeth A Nicolli; Robert M Brody; John P Fischer; Steven B Cannady; Jason G Newman
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.223

5.  Regent: A New Otolaryngology Clinical Data Registry.

Authors:  James C Denneny
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator Does Not Accurately Predict Risk of 30-Day Complications Among Patients Undergoing Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kevin Arce; Eric J Moore; Christine M Lohse; Matthew D Reiland; Jacob G Yetzer; Kyle S Ettinger
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Compliance with quality assurance measures in patients treated for early oral tongue cancer.

Authors:  Amy C Hessel; Mauricio A Moreno; Ehab Y Hanna; Dianna B Roberts; Jan S Lewin; Adel K El-Naggar; David I Rosenthal; Randal S Weber
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Predictors of adverse events after neck dissection: An analysis of the 2006-2011 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database.

Authors:  Umang Jain; Jessica Somerville; Sujata Saha; Jon P Ver Halen; Anuja K Antony; Sandeep Samant; John Y Kim
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.697

9.  The Relation between Obesity and Hospital Length of Stay after Elective Lateral Skull Base Surgery: An Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Brendan P O'Connell; Habib G Rizk; Shawn M Stevens; Shaun A Nguyen; Ted A Meyer
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 1.538

10.  Improving the quality of head and neck cancer care.

Authors:  Randal S Weber
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.