Francisco Schlottmann1,2, Paula D Strassle3,4, Anthony G Charles3, Marco G Patti3,5. 1. Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4030 Burnett Womack Building 101 Manning Drive, CB 7081, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7081, USA. fschlottmann@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. fschlottmann@hotmail.com. 3. Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4030 Burnett Womack Building 101 Manning Drive, CB 7081, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7081, USA. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Improvement in mortality has been shown for esophagectomies performed at high-volume centers. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if centralization of esophageal cancer surgery occurred in the US, and to establish its impact on postoperative mortality. In addition, we aimed to analyze the relationship between regionalization of cancer care and health disparities. METHODS: A retrospective population-based analysis was performed using the National Inpatient Sample for the period 2000-2014. Adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) diagnosed with esophageal cancer and who underwent esophagectomy were included. Yearly hospital volume was categorized as low (< 5 procedures), intermediate (5-20 procedures), and high (> 20 procedures). Multivariable analyses on the potential effect of hospital volume on patient outcomes were performed, and the yearly rate of esophagectomies was estimated using Poisson regression. RESULTS: A total of 5235 patients were included. Esophagectomy at low- [odds ratio (OR) 2.17] and intermediate-volume (OR 1.62) hospitals, compared with high-volume hospitals, was associated with a significant increase in mortality. The percentage of esophagectomies performed at high-volume centers significantly increased during the study period (29.2-68.5%; p < 0.0001). The trend towards high-volume hospitals was different among the different US regions: South (7.7-54.3%), West (15.0-67.6%), Midwest (37.3-67.7%), and Northeast (55.8-86.8%) [p < 0.0001]. Overall, the mortality rate of esophagectomy dropped from 10.0 to 3.5% (p = 0.006), with non-White race, public insurance, and low household income patients also showing a significant reduction in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A spontaneous centralization for esophageal cancer surgery occurred in the US. This process was associated with a decrease in the mortality rate, without contributing to health disparities.
BACKGROUND: Improvement in mortality has been shown for esophagectomies performed at high-volume centers. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if centralization of esophageal cancer surgery occurred in the US, and to establish its impact on postoperative mortality. In addition, we aimed to analyze the relationship between regionalization of cancer care and health disparities. METHODS: A retrospective population-based analysis was performed using the National Inpatient Sample for the period 2000-2014. Adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) diagnosed with esophageal cancer and who underwent esophagectomy were included. Yearly hospital volume was categorized as low (< 5 procedures), intermediate (5-20 procedures), and high (> 20 procedures). Multivariable analyses on the potential effect of hospital volume on patient outcomes were performed, and the yearly rate of esophagectomies was estimated using Poisson regression. RESULTS: A total of 5235 patients were included. Esophagectomy at low- [odds ratio (OR) 2.17] and intermediate-volume (OR 1.62) hospitals, compared with high-volume hospitals, was associated with a significant increase in mortality. The percentage of esophagectomies performed at high-volume centers significantly increased during the study period (29.2-68.5%; p < 0.0001). The trend towards high-volume hospitals was different among the different US regions: South (7.7-54.3%), West (15.0-67.6%), Midwest (37.3-67.7%), and Northeast (55.8-86.8%) [p < 0.0001]. Overall, the mortality rate of esophagectomy dropped from 10.0 to 3.5% (p = 0.006), with non-White race, public insurance, and low household income patients also showing a significant reduction in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A spontaneous centralization for esophageal cancer surgery occurred in the US. This process was associated with a decrease in the mortality rate, without contributing to health disparities.
Authors: Vignesh Raman; Oliver K Jawitz; Soraya L Voigt; Kristen E Rhodin; Anthony W Kim; Betty C Tong; Thomas A D'Amico; David H Harpole Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Francisco Schlottmann; Charles Gaber; Paula D Strassle; Fernando A M Herbella; Daniela Molena; Marco G Patti Journal: Dis Esophagus Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 3.429
Authors: Marianna V Papageorge; Benjamin J Resio; Andres F Monsalve; Maureen Canavan; Ranjan Pathak; Vincent J Mase; Andrew P Dhanasopon; Jessica R Hoag; Justin D Blasberg; Daniel J Boffa Journal: JNCI Cancer Spectr Date: 2020-07-07
Authors: Benjamin J Resio; Alexander S Chiu; Jessica R Hoag; Lawrence B Brown; Marney White; Audry Omar; Andres Monsalve; Andrew P Dhanasopon; Justin D Blasberg; Daniel J Boffa Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2018-11-02
Authors: Aaron M Delman; Allison M Ammann; Kevin M Turner; Dennis M Vaysburg; Robert M Van Haren Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2021-06 Impact factor: 2.895