Literature DB >> 29347864

Dense Breast Notification Laws: Impact on Downstream Imaging After Screening Mammography.

Michal Horný1,2, Alan B Cohen2, Richard Duszak1, Cindy L Christiansen2, Michael Shwartz2,3, James F Burgess2,3.   

Abstract

Dense breast tissue is a common finding that decreases the sensitivity of mammography in detecting cancer. Many states have recently enacted dense breast notification (DBN) laws to provide patients with information to help them make better-informed decisions about their health. To test whether DBN legislation affected the probability of screening mammography follow-up by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we examined the proportion of times screening mammography was followed by ultrasound or MRI for a series of months pre- and post-legislation. The subjects were women aged 40 to 64 years, covered by private health insurance, undergoing screening mammography from 2007 to 2014. Except for Hawaii, Maryland, and New York, DBN legislation significantly increased the probability of ultrasound follow-up in all states that implemented DBN legislation before December 2014. It also increased the probability of MRI follow-up in California, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The financial and access consequences merit further study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast magnetic resonance imaging; breast ultrasound; dense breast tissue; follow-up; screening mammography; state law

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29347864     DOI: 10.1177/1077558717751941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   3.929


  10 in total

Review 1.  The impact of mandatory mammographic breast density notification on supplemental screening practice in the United States: a systematic review.

Authors:  Meagan Brennan; Brooke Nickel; Shuangqin Huang; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Performance of Screening Ultrasonography as an Adjunct to Screening Mammography in Women Across the Spectrum of Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Janie M Lee; Robert F Arao; Brian L Sprague; Karla Kerlikowske; Constance D Lehman; Robert A Smith; Louise M Henderson; Garth H Rauscher; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  "You probably can't feel as safe as normal women": Hispanic women's reactions to breast density notification.

Authors:  Alsacia L Pacsi-Sepulveda; Rachel C Shelton; Carmen B Rodriguez; Arielle T Coq; Parisa Tehranifar
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Association of State Dense Breast Notification Laws With Supplemental Testing and Cancer Detection After Screening Mammography.

Authors:  Susan H Busch; Jessica R Hoag; Jenerius A Aminawung; Xiao Xu; Ilana B Richman; Pamela R Soulos; Kelly A Kyanko; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  The Impact of Breast Density Notification Laws on Supplemental Breast Imaging and Breast Biopsy.

Authors:  Loren Saulsberry; Lydia E Pace; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Physician Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Breast Density.

Authors:  Jordonna Brown; Chloe Soukas; Jenny J Lin; Laurie Margolies; Marimer Santiago-Rivas; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  A Qualitative Study of Spanish-Speakers' Experience with Dense Breast Notifications in a Massachusetts Safety-Net Hospital.

Authors:  Christine M Gunn; Amy Fitzpatrick; Sarah Waugh; Michelle Carrera; Nancy R Kressin; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Tracy A Battaglia
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Recent Trends in Screening Breast MRI.

Authors:  Michelle V Lee; Shani Aharon; Kevin Kim; Katerina Sunn Konstantinoff; Catherine M Appleton; Dustin Stwalley; Margaret A Olsen
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2021-12-11

9.  Population-Based Assessment of the Association Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Background Parenchymal Enhancement and Future Primary Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Vignesh A Arasu; Diana L Miglioretti; Brian L Sprague; Nila H Alsheik; Diana S M Buist; Louise M Henderson; Sally D Herschorn; Janie M Lee; Tracy Onega; Garth H Rauscher; Karen J Wernli; Constance D Lehman; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 50.717

10.  Simulation-based power and sample size calculation for designing interrupted time series analyses of count outcomes in evaluation of health policy interventions.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Shangyuan Ye; Bruce A Barton; Melissa A Fischer; Colleen Lawrence; Elizabeth J Rahn; Maria I Danila; Kenneth G Saag; Paul A Harris; Stephenie C Lemon; Jeroan J Allison; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2019-10-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.