Literature DB >> 29346792

Pancreaticoduodenectomy and Outcomes for Groove Pancreatitis.

Fabiola Aguilera1, Levan Tsamalaidze1,2, Massimo Raimondo3, Ruchir Puri1, Horacio J Asbun1, John A Stauffer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The operative management of groove pancreatitis (GP) is still a matter of controversy and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) can be a high-risk procedure for patients. The aim of this study was to report our 9-year experience of surgical resection for GP and to review relevant literature.
METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing pancreatectomy for GP from August 1, 2008, through May 31, 2017 was performed. Patients with clinical, radiologic, and final pathologic confirmation of GP were included. Literature on the current understanding of GP was reviewed.
RESULTS: Eight patients from total 449 pancreatectomies met inclusion criteria. Four male and 4 female patients (mean age, 51.9 years; mean body mass index, 25.3) underwent pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (3 by laparoscopy and 5 by open approach). Mean (range) operative time and blood loss was 343 (167-525) min and 218 (40-500) mL respectively. Pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying were noted in one patient each. No major complications occurred, but minor complications occurred in 5 (62%) patients. Mean hospital stay was 6.1 (range 3-14) days. At median follow-up of 18.15 (interquartile range 7.25-33.8) months, all patients experienced a resolution of pancreatitis and improvement in symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: PD is a safe procedure for GP. Short-term surgical outcomes are acceptable and long-term outcomes are associated with improved symptom control.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Groove pancreatitis; Pancreatitis Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Whipple

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29346792     DOI: 10.1159/000485849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  6 in total

1.  Outcome of Whipple's procedure for Groove pancreatitis: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Arkadeep Dhali; Sukanta Ray; Ranajoy Ghosh; Debashis Misra; Gopal Krishna Dhali
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-06-17

2.  Pancreas-preserving duodenal resections vs pancreatoduodenectomy for groove pancreatitis. Should we revisit treatment algorithm for groove pancreatitis?

Authors:  Vyacheslav Egorov; Roman Petrov; Aleksandr Schegolev; Elena Dubova; Andrey Vankovich; Eugeny Kondratyev; Andrey Dobriakov; Dmitry Kalinin; Natalia Schvetz; Elena Poputchikova
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-01-27

3.  Duodenal stenosis associated with an ectopic opening of the common bile duct into the duodenal bulb: a case report.

Authors:  Kazuki Kobayashi; Michinori Murayama; Hidekazu Sugasawa; Makoto Nishikawa; Kiyoshi Nishiyama; Hiroaki Takeo
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2021-12-16

4.  Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding as a Debut Form of Groove Pancreatitis: A Diagnostic Challenge.

Authors:  Belén Matías-García; Camilo José Castellón-Pavón; Gustavo Díaz-García; Belén Manso-Abajo; Daniel Hernández-Aceituno; Antonio Hermosín-Peña; Luis Mejías-Sosa; Manuel Durán-Poveda
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2022-03-07

5.  Could it be groove pancreatitis? A frequently misdiagnosed condition with a surgical solution.

Authors:  Joshua Teo; Arul Suthananthan; Ryan Pereira; Mark Bettington; Kellee Slater
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 2.025

6.  Pancreatoduodenectomy for paraduodenal pancreatitis: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

Authors:  Chao Jiang; Xueyan Liu; Weikai Yao; Meng Wang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.671

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.