| Literature DB >> 34914022 |
Kazuki Kobayashi1, Michinori Murayama2, Hidekazu Sugasawa2, Makoto Nishikawa2, Kiyoshi Nishiyama2, Hiroaki Takeo3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ectopic opening of the common bile duct is a rare congenital biliary anomaly. Herein, we present a case of duodenal stenosis with ectopic opening of the common bile duct into the duodenal bulb. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Duodenal stenosis; Duodenal ulcer; Ectopic opening of the common bile duct; Groove pancreatitis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34914022 PMCID: PMC8677856 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-021-01351-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surg Case Rep ISSN: 2198-7793
Fig. 1Endoscopic photograph. A The active duodenal ulcer, proximal to the duodenal stenosis. B The duodenal submucosal tumor at the duodenal bulb. C The papilla of Vater (white arrow) and the small opening with bile excretion (black arrow)
Fig. 2Contrast duodenography image. Duodenal stenosis (white arrow) and bile duct reflux (orange arrow) with a hook-like appearance
Fig. 3Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography image. The CBD (red arrow) exhibits a hook-like configuration. Separate opening between the CBD and pancreatic duct (white arrow)
Fig. 4Macroscopic examination of resected duodenum. Duodenal stenosis (white arrow), CBD opening (orange arrow), and papilla of Vater (black arrow)
Fig. 5Histopathological findings. A, B The CBD and pancreatic duct were separate openings with epithelial cells. A Duodenal stenosis: fibrosis without tumor cells (white arrow). Opening of the CBD: no sphincter muscle structure (orange arrow). H&E stain, × 20. B The papilla of Vater: separate opening of the pancreatic duct (black arrow) with only the muscle structure. H&E stain, × 2
The past report of EOCBD into the duodenal bulb
| No. | Author | Year | Number of cases | Duodenal ulcer ( | Duodenal stenosis ( | Cholangitis ( | Treatment | References | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surgical treatment | Endoscopic treatment ( | Medical or no treatment ( | ||||||||||
| BB ( | PD ( | Others ( | ||||||||||
| 1 | Lee et al | 1997 | 8 | 7 | – | 5 | 6 | 1 | 1 | [ | ||
| 2 | Lee et al | 2003 | 18 | 13 | 9 | 7 | 12 | 1 | 4 | 1 | [ | |
| 3 | Krstic et al | 2005 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | [ | ||||
| 4 | Disibeyaz et al | 2007 | 53 | 8 | 26 | 23 | 8 | 28 | 17 | [ | ||
| 5 | Song et al | 2007 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | [ | ||||
| 6 | Sezgin et al | 2010 | 10 | 2 | – | 3 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | [ | |
| 7 | Salitas et al | 2010 | 9 | 7 | – | – | 3 | 3 | 3 | [ | ||
| 8 | Parlak et al | 2010 | 74 | – | – | 30 | 13 | 60 | 1 | [ | ||
| 9 | Üsküdar et al | 2012 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | [ | ||||
| 10 | Lee et al | 2015 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | [ | ||||
| 11 | Takikawa et al | 2016 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | [ | ||||
| 12 | Taş et al | 2018 | 20 | 16 | 16 | 12 | 14 | 6 | [ | |||
| 13 | Lee et al | 2019 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | [ | ||||
| 14 | Peng et al | 2019 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 3 | – | [ | ||||
| 15 | Muhammedoǧlu et al. | 2019 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | [ | |||
| Total, | 208 | 58 (43.2) | 61 (57) | 90 (45.2) | 29 (14.5) | 2 (1) | 36 (18) | 107 (53.5) | 26 (13) | |||
BB bilioenteric bypass, PD pancreaticoduodenectomy, – not mentioned about it