Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai1,2, Simona Mastrangeli3, Enrico Romagnoli4, Mariangela Peruzzi3, Giacomo Frati3,5, Leonardo Roever6, Arturo Giordano7,8. 1. Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Corso della Repubblica 79, 04100, Latina, Italy. giuseppe.biondizoccai@uniroma1.it. 2. Department of AngioCardioNeurology, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy. giuseppe.biondizoccai@uniroma1.it. 3. Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Corso della Repubblica 79, 04100, Latina, Italy. 4. Division of Cardiology, S. Giovanni Hospital, Rome, Italy. 5. Department of AngioCardioNeurology, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy. 6. Department of Clinical Research, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil. 7. Unità Operativa di Interventistica Cardiovascolare, Presidio Ospedaliero Pineta Grande, Castel Volturno, Italy. 8. Unità Operativa di Emodinamica, Casa di Salute Santa Lucia, San Giuseppe Vesuviano, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Atherosclerosis has major morbidity and mortality implications globally. While it has often been considered an irreversible degenerative process, recent evidence provides compelling proof that atherosclerosis can be reversed. Plaque regression is however difficult to appraise and quantify, with competing diagnostic methods available. Given the potential of evidence synthesis to provide clinical guidance, we aimed to review recent meta-analyses on diagnostic methods for atherosclerotic plaque regression. RECENT FINDINGS: We identified 8 meta-analyses published between 2015 and 2017, including 79 studies and 14,442 patients, followed for a median of 12 months. They reported on atherosclerotic plaque regression appraised with carotid duplex ultrasound, coronary computed tomography, carotid magnetic resonance, coronary intravascular ultrasound, and coronary optical coherence tomography. Overall, all meta-analyses showed significant atherosclerotic plaque regression with lipid-lowering therapy, with the most notable effects on echogenicity, lipid-rich necrotic core volume, wall/plaque volume, dense calcium volume, and fibrous cap thickness. Significant interactions were found with concomitant changes in low density lipoprotein cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and C-reactive protein levels, and with ethnicity. Atherosclerotic plaque regression and conversion to a stable phenotype is possible with intensive medical therapy and can be demonstrated in patients using a variety of non-invasive and invasive imaging modalities.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Atherosclerosis has major morbidity and mortality implications globally. While it has often been considered an irreversible degenerative process, recent evidence provides compelling proof that atherosclerosis can be reversed. Plaque regression is however difficult to appraise and quantify, with competing diagnostic methods available. Given the potential of evidence synthesis to provide clinical guidance, we aimed to review recent meta-analyses on diagnostic methods for atherosclerotic plaque regression. RECENT FINDINGS: We identified 8 meta-analyses published between 2015 and 2017, including 79 studies and 14,442 patients, followed for a median of 12 months. They reported on atherosclerotic plaque regression appraised with carotid duplex ultrasound, coronary computed tomography, carotid magnetic resonance, coronary intravascular ultrasound, and coronary optical coherence tomography. Overall, all meta-analyses showed significant atherosclerotic plaque regression with lipid-lowering therapy, with the most notable effects on echogenicity, lipid-rich necrotic core volume, wall/plaque volume, dense calcium volume, and fibrous cap thickness. Significant interactions were found with concomitant changes in low density lipoprotein cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and C-reactive protein levels, and with ethnicity. Atherosclerotic plaque regression and conversion to a stable phenotype is possible with intensive medical therapy and can be demonstrated in patients using a variety of non-invasive and invasive imaging modalities.
Authors: Giuseppe G L Biondi-Zoccai; Antonio Abbate; Giovanna Liuzzo; Luigi M Biasucci Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-04-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Luca Di Vito; Fabrizio Imola; Laura Gatto; Enrico Romagnoli; Ugo Limbruno; Valeria Marco; Andrea Picchi; Antonio Micari; Mario Albertucci; Francesco Prati Journal: EuroIntervention Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 6.534
Authors: Paul M Ridker; Brendan M Everett; Tom Thuren; Jean G MacFadyen; William H Chang; Christie Ballantyne; Francisco Fonseca; Jose Nicolau; Wolfgang Koenig; Stefan D Anker; John J P Kastelein; Jan H Cornel; Prem Pais; Daniel Pella; Jacques Genest; Renata Cifkova; Alberto Lorenzatti; Tamas Forster; Zhanna Kobalava; Luminita Vida-Simiti; Marcus Flather; Hiroaki Shimokawa; Hisao Ogawa; Mikael Dellborg; Paulo R F Rossi; Roland P T Troquay; Peter Libby; Robert J Glynn Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-08-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Walter Masson; Martin Lobo; Daniel Siniawski; Graciela Molinero; Gerardo Masson; Melina Huerín; Juan Patricio Nogueira Journal: Lipids Health Dis Date: 2020-05-27 Impact factor: 3.876