| Literature DB >> 29344721 |
Bridgette Webb1,2,3, Thomas Widek4,5, Sylvia Scheicher4,5, Thorsten Schwark4,6, Rudolf Stollberger7,5.
Abstract
As the implementation of minimally invasive imaging techniques in both forensic and pathological practice increases, research in this area focuses on addressing recognised diagnostic weaknesses of current approaches. Assessment of sudden cardiac death (SCD) can be considered one such area in which post-mortem imaging still shows diagnostic weaknesses. We hypothesise that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with an angiographic adjunct may improve the visualisation and interpretation of cardiac pathologies in a post-mortem setting. To systematically investigate this hypothesis, selected perfusates (paraffin oil, Gadovist®;-doped physiological solution and polyethylene glycol (PEG)) were injected into the left anterior descending (LAD) artery of ex situ porcine hearts to assess the visualisation of perfusates in MRI as well as their intravascular retention over 12 h. Morphological images were acquired and quantitative T1 maps were generated from inversion recovery data. Visualisation of vascular structure and image quality were assessed using signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios. Intravascular retention was assessed both visually and statistically using a volume of interest (VOI) approach to analyse significant changes in signal intensity in and around the filled LAD artery, as well as changes in the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) in adjacent myocardium. In addition to presenting possible mechanisms explaining perfusate extravasation given the increased permeability of post-mortem vessels, the potential diagnostic consequences of this phenomenon and the importance of contrast stability and extended intravascular retention are discussed. In light of our findings and these considerations, paraffin oil emerged as the preferred perfusate for use in post-mortem MR angiography.Entities:
Keywords: Angiography; Extravasation; Post-mortem MRI; Vessel permeability
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29344721 PMCID: PMC5807516 DOI: 10.1007/s00414-017-1763-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Legal Med ISSN: 0937-9827 Impact factor: 2.686
Injection volumes for ex situ porcine hearts (A, B and C)
| Perfusate | VolumeA(ml) | VolumeB(ml) | VolumeC(ml) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gadovist®; solution | 2.8 | 2.8 | 9.0 |
| Paraffin oil | 2.8 | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PEG 200 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 3.0 |
Fig. 1Scheme detailing perfusate injection and image acquisition. Quantitative data (TIR) was not acquired at T= 1 due to the duration of the sequence
Fig. 2Morphological image displaying a ROIs for the calculation of SNR and CNR (1: perfusate, 2: myocardium, 3: epicardial fat, 4: noise) and b VOIs (single slice) for the LAD artery (VOI1) and adjacent myocardium (VOI2). VOI took a similar form to VOI2. For orientation, the anterior wall of the heart is at the bottom of the image
Fig. 3Maximum intensity projection (MIP) of example morphological images. Immediately after injection of a Gadovist®; solution, b paraffin oil and c PEG 200, and 12 h after injection of d Gadovist®; solution, e paraffin oil and f PEG200
Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for all samples at T= 1
| Myocardium | Epicardial fat | Perfusate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paraffin oilA | 35.11 | 37.78 | 41.39 |
| Paraffin oilB | 35.04 | 36.24 | 45.35 |
| Paraffin oilC | 34.90 | 36.39 | 44.22 |
| Mean | − |
| 43.7 |
| PEG 200A | 36.26 | 38.75 | 42.86 |
| PEG 200B | 34.05 | 35.06 | 39.70 |
| PEG 200C | 34.61 | 37.80 | 39.17 |
| Mean | − | − | 40.6 |
| Gadovist®; solutionA | 34.59 | 37.26 | 44.34 |
| Gadovist®; solutionB | 34.43 | 36.11 | 48.50 |
| Gadovist®; solutionC | 34.86 | 39.18 | 48.97 |
| Mean |
|
| 47.3 |
| Mean | 34.9 | 37.2 |
|
Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for all samples at T= 1
| Perfusate | Myocardium | Epicardial fat |
|---|---|---|
| (mean | (mean | |
| Paraffin oil | 39.5 | 37.8 |
| PEG 200 | 34.0 | 29.6 |
| Gadovist®; solution | 44.9 | 43.6 |
p values from the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for changes in mean SI in VOI1 and VOI2 as well as for changes in mean T1 values in VOIQ
| Paraffin oilA | 0.067 | 0.724 | 0.056 | 0.227 |
| Paraffin oilB | 0.016 | 0.066 | 0.765 | 0.763 |
| Paraffin oilC | 0.116 | 0.070 | 0.637 | 0.780 |
| PEG 200A | ≪ 0.001 | ≪ 0.001 | 0.568 | 0.826 |
| PEG 200B | ≪ 0.001 | 0.040 | 0.812 | 0.001 |
| PEG 200C | ≪ 0.001 | ≪ 0.001 | 0.333 | 0.008 |
| Gadovist®; solutionA | 0.297 | ≪ 0.001 | ≪ 0.001 | ≪ 0.001 |
| Gadovist®; solutionB | 0.036 | ≪ 0.001 | ≪ 0.001 | ≪ 0.001 |
| Gadovist®; solutionC | ≪ 0.001 | ≪ 0.001 | ≪ 0.001 | ≪ 0.001 |
Fig. 4Boxplots representing signal intensity (SI) in a left anterior descending (LAD) artery (VOI1) immediately following injection (T= 1) and 1 h after injection (T= 2) and in b myocardium adjacent to the filled LAD (VOI2) immediately following injection (T= 1) and 1 h after injection (T= 2). A, B and C represent the three repetitions
Fig. 5Distribution of T1 values (A, B, C) in myocardium adjacent to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) prior to perfusate injection (T= 0), one (T= 2) and 12 h (T= 3) later