Literature DB >> 29344429

Pathway Analysis of Gene Expression of E14 Versus E18 Fetal Fibroblasts.

Michael S Hu1,2, Mimi R Borrelli1, Michael Januszyk1, Anna Luan1, Samir Malhotra1, Graham G Walmsley1, Wan Xing Hong1, Ruth Tevlin1, Geoffrey C Gurtner1, Michael T Longaker1,2, Hermann P Lorenz1.   

Abstract

Objective: Fetuses early in gestation heal skin wounds without forming scars. The biological mechanisms behind this process are largely unknown. Fibroblasts, however, are cells known to be intimately involved in wound healing and scar formation. We examined fibroblasts in different stages of development to characterize differences in gene expression that may result in the switch from regenerative wound repair to repair with scarring. Approach: Fibroblasts were isolated and cultured from the back skin of BALB/c wild-type mouse fetuses at embryonic day (E)14 and E18 (n = 10). The fibroblast total RNA was extracted, and microarray analysis was conducted using chips containing 42,000 genes. Significance analysis of microarrays was performed to identify genes with greater than twofold expression difference and a false discovery rate of less than two. Identified genes subsequently underwent enrichment analysis to detect differentially expressed pathways.
Results: Two hundred seventy-five genes were differentially expressed between E14 and E18 in fetal fibroblasts. Thirty genes were significantly downregulated and 245 genes were significantly upregulated at E18 compared with E14. Ingenuity pathway analysis identified the top 20 signaling pathways differentially activated in fetal fibroblasts between the E18 and E14 time points. Innovation: To our knowledge, this work represents the first instance where differentially expressed genes and signaling pathways between fetal fibroblasts at E14 and E18 have been studied.
Conclusion: The genes and pathways identified here potentially underlie the mechanism behind the transition from fetal wound healing via regeneration to wound healing by repair, and may prove to be key targets for future therapeutics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  microarray; regeneration; scarless repair; wound healing

Year:  2018        PMID: 29344429      PMCID: PMC5770085          DOI: 10.1089/wound.2017.0763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)        ISSN: 2162-1918            Impact factor:   4.730


  27 in total

Review 1.  Activation of hepatic stellate cells--a key issue in liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Helen L Reeves; Scott L Friedman
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2002-04-01

2.  Wound size and gestational age modulate scar formation in fetal wound repair.

Authors:  D L Cass; K M Bullard; K G Sylvester; E Y Yang; M T Longaker; N S Adzick
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  Regulation of chromatin remodeling by inositol polyphosphates.

Authors:  David J Steger; Elizabeth S Haswell; Aimee L Miller; Susan R Wente; Erin K O'Shea
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Antioxidant status in delayed healing type of wounds.

Authors:  A M Rasik; A Shukla
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 5.  Scarless fetal wound healing: a basic science review.

Authors:  Barrett J Larson; Michael T Longaker; H Peter Lorenz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 6.  Cytokines, inflammation and colon cancer.

Authors:  Lidija Klampfer
Journal:  Curr Cancer Drug Targets       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.428

Review 7.  Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) and inflammation in cancer.

Authors:  Brian Bierie; Harold L Moses
Journal:  Cytokine Growth Factor Rev       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 7.638

8.  A biologic function for an "orphan" messenger: D-myo-inositol 3,4,5,6-tetrakisphosphate selectively blocks epithelial calcium-activated chloride channels.

Authors:  I I Ismailov; C M Fuller; B K Berdiev; V G Shlyonsky; D J Benos; K E Barrett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Inflammation and cancer.

Authors:  Lisa M Coussens; Zena Werb
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002 Dec 19-26       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Gene expression in fetal murine keratinocytes and fibroblasts.

Authors:  Michael S Hu; Michael Januszyk; Wan Xing Hong; Graham G Walmsley; Elizabeth R Zielins; David A Atashroo; Zeshaan N Maan; Adrian McArdle; Danny M Takanishi; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Michael T Longaker; Hermann Peter Lorenz
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 2.192

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Regenerative Scar-Free Skin Wound Healing.

Authors:  Mehri Monavarian; Safaa Kader; Seyedsina Moeinzadeh; Esmaiel Jabbari
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Wound Healing Research at the Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine.

Authors:  Michael S Hu; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Notch1/2/3/4 are prognostic biomarker and correlated with immune infiltrates in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jian Hu; Jianghong Yu; Jun Gan; Ning Song; Liubin Shi; Jie Liu; Ziqiang Zhang; Jianjun Du
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 5.682

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.