| Literature DB >> 29344351 |
Yulia Rosa Saharman1,2, Anis Karuniawati1, Rudyanto Sedono3, Dita Aditianingsih3, Pratiwi Sudarmono1, Wil H F Goessens2, Corné H W Klaassen2, Henri A Verbrugh2, Juliëtte A Severin2.
Abstract
Background: Carbapenem-nonsusceptible A. baumannii-calcoaceticus complex have emerged worldwide, but the epidemiology in Indonesian hospitals has not been studied.Entities:
Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex; Antimicrobial resistance; Carbapenemase; Carbapenems; Indonesia; Intensive care unit
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29344351 PMCID: PMC5767053 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-017-0296-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ISSN: 2047-2994 Impact factor: 4.887
Fig. 1Acquisition of carbapenem-nonsusceptible Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex in ICUs. Note: The solid line represents the cumulative percentage of patients by first day of culture being positive for carbapenem-nonsusceptible A. baumannii-calcoaceticus complex during ICU stay. In total, data from 89 patients are included in this figure. The median acquisition day (day 7, 60% of patients positive) is shown as well
Fig. 2Cumulative percentage of length of stay for patients according to their carbapenem-nonsusceptible Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex status. Note: Lengths of stay (days) represent total days patients were hospitalized in the ICU. The red line represents patients that were always carbapenem-nonsusceptible A. baumanniicalcoaceticus complex negative during their ICU stay. The blue line represents patients already carbapenem-nonsusceptible A. baumanniicalcoaceticus complex positive on the day of admission. The green line represents patients that were carbapenem-nonsusceptible A. baumanniicalcoaceticus complex positive only at the time of discharge and the black line represents patients that became positive for carbapenem-nonsusceptible A. baumanniicalcoaceticus complex during their ICU stay before the day of discharge. P value: comparison between patients that became positive with carbapenem-nonsusceptible A. baumanniicalcoaceticus complex before the day of discharge and the other groups
Fig. 3Survival analysis of ICU patients according to their carbapenem-nonsusceptible Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex status. Note: Survival of patients with carbapenem-nonsusceptible A. baumanniicalcoaceticus complex acquired during their ICU stay (blue line) compared with the survival of patients that remained negative for carbapenem-nonsusceptible A. baumanniicalcoaceticus complex in their screening and clinical cultures (green line)
Patient characteristics and outcomes according to carbapenem-nonsusceptible A. baumanniicalcoaceticus complex status
| Carbapenem-nonsusceptible | Carbapenem-nonsusceptible | Carbapenem-nonsusceptible | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ||||
| Age (years), median (IQR) | 47 (33–60) | 48 (35.3–57) | 46 (32–58) | 0.700 |
| Gender (%) | 0.535 | |||
| Male | 35 (50.7) | 42 (47.2) | 137 (53.9) | |
| Female | 34 (49.3) | 47 (52.8) | 117 (46.1) | |
| Underlying diseases (%) | ||||
| Cardiovascular | 0.024 | |||
| Yes | 9 (13.0) | 3 (3.4) | 13 (5.1) | |
| No | 60 (87.0) | 86 (96.6) | 241 (94.9) | |
| Cerebrovascular | 0.001 | |||
| Yes | 3 (4.3) | 14 (15.7) | 12 (4.7) | |
| No | 66 (95.7) | 75 (84.3) | 242 (95.3) | |
| Chronic kidney disease | 0.915 | |||
| Yes | 5 (7.2) | 8 (9.0) | 20 (7.9) | |
| No | 64 (92.8) | 81 (91.0) | 234 (92.1) | |
| Diabetes mellitus | 0.334 | |||
| Yes | 20 (29.0) | 20 (22.5) | 78 (30.7) | |
| No | 49 (71.0) | 69 (77.5) | 176 (69.3) | |
| Malignancy | 0.740 | |||
| Yes | 29 (42.0) | 37 (41.6) | 116 (45.7) | |
| No | 40 (58.0) | 52 (58.4) | 138 (54.3) | |
| Indication for ICU admission (%) | 0.002 | |||
| Medical | 32 (46.4) | 38 (42.7) | 70 (27.6) | |
| Surgical | 37 (53.6) | 51 (57.3) | 184 (72.4) | |
| Referral from (%) | 0.900 | |||
| Other ward this hospital | 38 (55.1) | 48 (53.9) | 136 (53.5) | |
| Other hospital | 14 (20.3) | 14 (15.7) | 49 (19.3) | |
| Directly from Emergency Unit | 17 (24.6) | 27 (30.3) | 69 (27.2) | |
| Antibiotic exposure (pre-ICU admission) | ||||
| Any antibiotic (%) | 58 (84.1) | 73 (82.0) | 180 (70.9) | 0.021 |
| Carbapenem (%) | 24 (34.8) | 22 (24.7) | 33 (13.0) | <0.01 |
| SIRS Score, (%) | 0.916 | |||
| Score ≥ 2 | 64 (92.8) | 81 (91.0) | 232 (91.3) | |
| Score < 2 | 5 (7.2) | 8 (9.0) | 22 (8.7) | |
| qSOFA Score, (%) | 0.089 | |||
| Score ≥ 2 | 51 (73.9) | 78 (87.6) | 205 (80.7) | |
| Score < 2 | 18 (26.1) | 11 (12.4) | 49 (19.3) | |
| Procedures (during ICU admission) | ||||
| Mechanical ventilation (%) | 63 (91.3) | 88 (98.9) | 220 (86.6) | 0.004 |
| Mechanical ventilation (days) median(IQR) | 5 (2–8) | 8 (4–16) | 3 (1–6) | |
| ≥ 5 days (%) | 36 (52.2) | 63 (70.8) | 83 (2.7) | <0.01 |
| < 5 days (%) | 33 (47.8) | 26 (29.2) | 171 (67.3) | |
| Central venous catheter (%) | 66 (95.7) | 85 (95.5) | 212 (83.5) | <0.01 |
| Central venous catheter (days) median(IQR) | 6 (3–9) | 10 (5–17) | 4 (2–7) | |
| ≥ 5 days (%) | 41 (59.4) | 71 (79.8) | 111 (3.7) | <0.01 |
| < 5 days (%) | 28 (40.6) | 18 (20.2) | 143 (56.3) | |
| Urine catheter | 69 (100) | 89 (100) | 254 (100) | N/A |
| Urine catheter (days) median (IQR) | 6 (3–10) | 10 (6–18) | 5 (3–7) | |
| ≥ 5 days (%) | 26 (37.7) | 13 (14.6) | 122 (48.0) | <0.01 |
| < 5 days (%) | 43 (62.3) | 76 (85.4) | 132 (52.0) | |
| Antibiotic therapy (during ICU admission) | ||||
| Any antibiotic (%) | 68 (98.6) | 89 (100) | 249 (98.0) | 0.411 |
| Carbapenem (%) | 42 (60.9) | 62 (69.7) | 95 (37.4) | <0.01 |
| Outcomes | ||||
| Length of stay (days), median (IQR) | 5 (3–9) | 11 (5–18) | 4 (3–7) | <0.01 |
| Death | 22 (31.9) | 38 (42.7) | 59 (23.2) | 0.002 |
Abbreviations: ICU, Intensive Care Unit; IQR, Interquartile range; qSOFA, quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment; SIRS, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
Significance was calculated using Oneway ANOVA and Pearson Chi Square
A p-value less than 0.01 was considered statistically significant
Results of MLST analyses of 14 carbapenem-nonsusceptible A. baumanniicalcoaceticus complex isolates
| Sample number | ST | gltA | gyrB | gdhB | recA | cpn60 | gpi | rpoD | OXA-51 group | OXA-23 | Raman cluster |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 171bl040813 | new ST | 1 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 164 | 3 | OXA-66 | + | CIPTO-31 |
| 262bl211013 | new ST | 1 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 164 | 3 | OXA-66 | + | CIPTO-31 |
| 275bl101013 | new ST | 1 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 61 | 3 | OXA-66 | + | CIPTO-31 |
| 69E–bed-rails-4 | new ST | 1 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 164 | 3 | OXA-66 | + | CIPTO-31 |
| 404re030714 | 195 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 96 | 3 | OXA-66 | + | CIPTO-48 |
| 91EIGD1214 | 195 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 96 | 3 | OXA-66 | + | CIPTO-48 |
| 156th250713 | new allel/ST | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | new | 3 | OXA-66 | + | CIPTO-48 |
| 206bl020913 | new allel/ST | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | new | 3 | OXA-66 | + | CIPTO-46 |
| 319bl020514 | 208 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 97 | 3 | OXA-66 | + | CIPTO-46 |
| 207re300813 | new ST | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 61 | 3 | OXA-66 | + | CIPTO-45 |
| 422sp170714 | new ST | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 61 | 3 | OXA-66 | + | CIPTO-45 |
| 116sp080713 | 218 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 102 | 3 | OXA-66 | + | CIPTO-30 |
| 176BA150813 | 218 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 102 | 3 | OXA-66 | + | CIPTO-30 |
| 153bl290713 | 642 | 22 | 15 | 13 | 12 | 4 | 169 | 2 | OXA-68 | + | CIPTO-39 |
Abbreviations: MLST, Multilocus Sequence Type; ST, Sequence Type
Fig. 4Persistence of Raman clones of carbapenem-nonsusceptible Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex in two ICUs of Dr. Cipto Mangunkusomo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia. Note: Endemic curves of the five biggest clusters of carbapenem-nonsusceptible A. baumanniicalcoaceticus complex in each ICU, April–October 2013 and April–August 2014. The dark blue bars represent cluster CIPTO-30. The red bars represent CIPTO-31. The green bars represent CIPTO-45. The yellow bars represent CIPTO-46 and the light blue bars represent CIPTO-48. The x-axis indicates time of the study (by week). The y-axis indicates number of isolates