Small Peptides Able to Suppress Prostaglandin E₂ Generation in Renal Mesangial Cells.

Peptide drug discovery may play a key role in the identification of novel medicinal agents. Here, we present the development of novel small peptides able to suppress the production of PGE₂ in mesangial cells. The new compounds were generated by structural alterations applied on GK115, a novel inhibitor of secreted phospholipase A₂, which has been previously shown to reduce PGE₂ synthesis in rat renal mesangial cells. Among the synthesized compounds, the tripeptide derivative 11 exhibited a nice dose-dependent suppression of PGE₂ production, similar to that observed for GK115.

1. Introduction

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is one of the most important lipid mediators [1] playing a pivotal role in inflammatory diseases [2] including glomerulonephritis. Glomerulonephritis is initiated by the invasion of activated immune cells into the renal glomerulus and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNFα and interleukin (IL) 1β to activate the local resident mesangial cells [3,4]. This activation includes three main responses, i.e., increased proliferation, increased matrix production, and increased inflammatory mediator production, which are all hallmarks of glomerulonephritis, finally resulting in glomerulosclerosis and renal failure [4]. Due to this central involvement of mesangial cells in the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory kidney diseases, they serve as a useful cellular model system to test for new therapeutic compounds to treat such diseases.

The biosynthesis of PGE2 is initiated by the action of phospholipases A2 (PLA2), which cleave the n class="Chemical">sn-2 ester bond of membrane glycerophospholipids to release arachidonic acid [5,6]. Then, arachidonic acid is converted to PGH2 and the terminal step of PGE2 generation is catalyzed by microsomal prostaglandin synthase-1 [7]. Four types of PLA2 [6] are expressed at mesangial cells: cytosolic (cPLA2) GIVA, calcium-independent (iPLA2) GVIA and secreted (sPLA2) GIIA and GV [8,9,10]. It has been demonstrated that the progression of glomerular inflammatory processes is a result of a network of interactions between different PLA2s [9] and a cross-talk between cPLA2 and sPLA2 has been reported in hydrogen peroxide-induced arachidonic acid release in murine mesangial cells [11]. In addition, sPLA2 GIIA seems to have multiple roles in mesangial cells inducing the production of pro-inflammatory mediators [12].

We have recently demonstrated that inhibitors of sPLA2 suppress the release of PGE2 formation in renal mesangial cells [13]. Four such inhibitors presented an interesting effect on the suppression of PGE2 release and their structures are shown in Figure 1. Inhibitors 1 (GK115) [14] and 2 [15] are amides based on the non-natural amino acids γ-norleucine and γ-tyrosine, respectively, while inhibitors 3 (GK126) [16] and 4 (GK241) [17] are 2-oxoamides based on the natural amino acids leucine and valine, respectively. As depicted in Figure 1, all of them are characterized by high lipophilicity (ClogP value higher than 5), an unfavorable property according to Lipinski’s rule of 5 [18]. The ClogP values of the inhibitors were calculated using ChemOffice Ultra 11.00.

Figure 1

Inhibitors of secreted PLA2 able to suppress the formation of PGE2 in mesangial cells.

Over the last years, peptide drug discovery has experienced a revival of interest, as the pharmaceutical industry has come to appreciate the role that peptides may play in addressing unmet medical needs and how peptides can be an excellent complement to small molecule medicinal agents [19]. In an effort to identify novel compounds able to suppress the formation of PGE2, in the current work we explored the possibility of small conjugated peptides to inhibit the release of PGE2 at a cellular level. Herein, we report the structure-based design and synthesis of several small peptides derivatives (Figure 2), whose structures are inspired by the structures of sPLA2 inhibitors described above, and the evaluation of their ability to suppress PGE2 formation.

Figure 2

The design of new inhibitors was based on alterations of Groups A and B of GK115 structure. The table describes the alterations of Groups A and B and the corresponded generated compounds in brackets.

2. Results

2.1. Synthesis

Inspired by the structure of inhibitor GK115 and considering it as a lead compound, we designed derivatives replacing the γ-norleucine residue by α-norleucine or a norleucine based dipeptide. In addition, and in an effort to decrease the lipophilicity of the compounds, we replaced the acyl chain of GK115 (Group A, Figure 2) by a chain based on the benzoyl derivative of the peptide glycyl-glycine (Group C, Figure 2).

Compound 7 was synthesized by coupling of 7-phenyl-heptanoic acid 5 with the n class="Chemical">dipeptide norleucyl-glycine using 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethyl carbodiimide (WSCI) as a condensing agent in the presence of 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt), followed by alkaline hydrolysis (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1

Reagents and conditions: a. H-Nle-Gly-OMe, WSCI·HCl, HOBt, Et3N, CH2Cl2; b. 1 N aq NaOH, MeOH.

Compound 11, where the acyl chain of GK115 was replaced by the benzoyl derivative of the n class="Chemical">dipeptide glycyl-glycine, was synthesized by coupling of benzoyl-glycyl-glycine 8 with methyl γ-norleucinate 9, as depicted in Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Reagents and conditions: a. WSCI·HCl, HOBt, Et3N, CH2Cl2; b. 1 N aq NaOH, MeOH.

To synthesize derivatives based on either α-norleucine or the dipeptide norleucyl-glycine, benzoyl-glycine 12 was coupled with methyl norleucyl-glycinate (Scheme 3). After alkaline hydrolysis, compounds 14a and 14b based on (R)- and (S)-norleucine, respectively, were obtained. Coupling of 14a with tert-butyl glycinate led to compound 16a after acidic hydrolysis.

Scheme 3

Reagents and conditions: a. H-Gly-Nle-OMe, WSCI·HCl, HOBt, Et3N, CH2Cl2; b. 1 N aq NaOH, MeOH; c. H-Gly-OtBu, WSCI·HCl, HOBt, Et3N, CH2Cl2; d. CF3COOH, CH2Cl2.

2.2. Suppression of PGE2 Release in Mesangial Cells

Cultures of rat renal mesangial cells were stimulated for 24 h with IL-1β plus n class="Chemical">forskolin (Fk) to trigger a huge increase of PGE2 synthesis, as previously described [20]. Cells were treated in the absence or presence of three different concentrations (1 μM, 3 μM and 10 μM) of the various synthetic compounds. Supernatants were collected and subjected to PGE2-ELISA to quantify PGE2 released from the cells.

The results of the suppression of PGE2 release in mesangial cells caused by the new peptides derivatives are shown in Figure 3. In the absence of IL-1β plus Fk, none of the compounds, tested at the highest concentn class="Species">ration of 10 μM, changed the basal PGE2 synthesis significantly (data not shown).

Figure 3

Effect of compounds 7, 11, 14a, 14b and 16a on IL-1β/Fk-stimulated PGE2 formation in mesangial cells. Data are presented as % of maximal IL-1β/Fk stimulation and are means ± S.D. (n = 3). ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 considered statistical significant when compared to the IL-1β/Fk samples. Basal PGE2 concentration was at 7.9 ± 5.3 pg/100 μL supernatant; the maximal IL-1β/Fk-stimulated PGE2 concentration was at 685 ± 81 pg/100 μL supernatant.

Most of the peptides derivatives tested were able to reduce the release of PGE2. The replacement of γ-norleucine by the dipeptide Nle-Gly (compound 7) did not cause any remarkable difference in activity. The tripeptide derivative 11 exhibited a nice dose-dependent curve similar to that observed for GK115. The replacement of the hydrocarbon acyl chain of GK115 by the dipeptide glycyl-glycine chain resulted in a considerable decrease of the lipophilicity, dropping the ClogP value from 5.28 to 1.73. It should be noticed that this derivative seems efficiently protected by the action of both aminopeptidases and carboxypeptidases. Peptides based on γ-amino acids are resistant to carboxypeptidases [21], while the benzoyl protecting group offers resistance to aminopeptidases. Tripeptides 14a and 14b and tetrapeptide 16a derivatives exhibited similar ability to suppress PGE2 formation irrespectively of either the stereochemistry of norleucine (R in 14a and S in 14b) or the size of the peptide (tripeptide versus tetrapeptide). Peptide incorporation of segments in 13a, 14b and 16a resulted in reduced lipophilicities with ClogP values of 1.51, 1.51 and 0.94, respectively. These results confirm our hypothesis that we could improve compounds’ lipophilicity, while preserve their potency to suppress PGE2 release.

2.3. Docking Studies

Since we have shown that inhibition of sPLA2 is a possible path via which our sPLA2 inhibitors (GK115, GK126 and GK241) evoke the suppression of PGE2 release [13], we performed docking calculations for the binding pose prediction of compounds GK115 and 11 in the active site of the enzyme.

Sybyl 8.0 [22] by TRIPOS was used for the design and the energy minimization of the structures. The carboxyl group was considered deprotonated and the Powell algorithm was used for the energy minimization. The crystal structure of sPLA2 GIIA was retrieved from the Brookhaven Protein Databank (code: 1KQU) and used for the docking calculations. The protein’s missing loops were added with the Prime module of Schrödinger Suite [23]. The molecules were placed in the active site of the enzyme manually in Chimera [24] and docked in AutoDock Vina [25].

By visual inspection of the docking results, docking poses which reproduced the known interactions between the co-crystallized ligands and the enzyme, were chosen and subjected to molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with AMBER14 [26], following a standard procedure [17]. MD simulations (100 ns) were run and the top cluster of each simulation is shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. For the clustering, the hieragglo algorithm was used and the averagelinkage option in cpptraj [27] was defined using the Leu2, n class="Chemical">Phe5, His6, Ile9, Ala17-Gly32, Cys44, His47, Asp48, Lys62, Asp91 and Phe98 amino acids.

Figure 4

Binding pose prediction of GK115 in the active site of sPLA2 GIIA (red: oxygen atoms, blue: nitrogen atoms, green: calcium atom).

Figure 5

Binding pose prediction of 11 in the active site of sPLA2 GIIA (red: oxygen atoms, blue: nitrogen atoms, green: calcium atom).

The carboxyl group of both molecules and the carbonyl group of the Nle-Gly peptide bond of 11 and the amide group of GK115 chelate the Ca2+ ion throughout the simulation time. Additionally, a hydrogen bond is formed between His47 and the -NH group of the peptide bond of 11 and the amide group of GK115, respectively. These interactions are present in the crystallized structures of sPLA2 GIIA with the native ligands [15]. Both inhibitors adopt similar conformation in the active site and they preserve it, with small fluctuations, during the MD time (Figure 6).

Figure 6

Root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values of inhibitors 11 (green) and GK115 (orange) in the active site of sPLA2 GIIA during the MD simulation time.

This further contributes to the persistence of the interactions between the molecules and the residues of the active site. MM-PBSA [28] method was used for the estimation of the energetic terms of both systems. The ΔH value for inhibitor GK115 is −47.16 kcal/mol with a standard deviation error (SDE) 5.16 kcal/mol and for compound 11 is −38.22 kcal/mol with SDE of 6.26 kcal/mol. Since GK115 is a potent inhibitor of sPLA2 GIIA, both the key interactions and the ΔH values calculated by the MD trajectories are a good indicator of a possible inhibition of sPLA2 GIIA by 11 and biological assays will be performed in a future study to investigate this possibility.

3. Discussion

Our studies led to the identification of a number of small peptides derivatives that present a significant suppression of PGE2 release in renal mesangial cells. Among them, benzoyl-glycyl-glycyl-γ-(R)-norleucine (11) showed an interesting effect on the suppression of PGE2 formation. This tripeptide derivative has a significant lower lipophilicity in comparison to the lead compound GK115 without loss of the ability to suppress PGE2 release at a cellular level. Thus, new agents that can serve as leads to reduce pathological PGE2 production, as seen in chronic inflammatory kidney diseases such as glomerulonephritis, have been identified.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemistry

Merck Silica Gel 60 (70–230 or 230–400 mesh) (Merck Co., Darmstadt, Germany) was used for the chromatographic purification of products and n class="Chemical">Silica Gel 60 F254 (Merck Co., Darmstadt, Germany) aluminum plates for the thin-layer chromatography (TLC). UV light and/or phosphomolybdic acid in EtOH was employed for visualizing shpots. A Büchi 530 apparatus (Buchi, Flawil, Switzerland) was used to estimate melting points and they were uncorrected. 1H and 13C–NMR spectra were recorded on Varian Mercury (Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) at 200 MHz and 50 MHz respectively. Samples were diluted in CDCl3, CD3OD, DMSO or D2O. Chemical shifts are given in ppm, and coupling constants (J) in Hz. Peak multiplicities are typified as: s, singlet, d, doublet, t, triplet and m, multiplet. Electron spray ionization (ESI) mass spectra were recorded on a Finnigan, Surveyor MSQ Plus spectrometer (Thermo Finnigan, Ringoes, NJ, USA). Specific rotations of the compounds were measured at 25 °C on a Perkin-Elmer 343 polarimeter (PerkinElmer Inc., Shelton, CT, USA) using a 10 cm cell. Dichloromethane was dried by standard procedures and stored over molecular sieves. No further purification of other solvents and chemicals needed as they were reagent grade. HRMS spectra were recorded on a Bruker Maxis Impact QTOF Spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA).

4.1.1. Coupling Method

To a stirred solution of hydrochloride amino component (1.0 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL), Et3N (0.3 mL, 2.2 mmol) and subsequently WSCI∙HCl (0.21 g, 1.1 mmol) and HOBt (0.14 g, 1.0 mmol) were added at 0 °C. The acid component (1.0 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at 0 °C and then overnight at room temperature. After the completion of the reaction, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and EtOAc (20 mL) was added. The organic layer was washed consecutively with brine, 1 N aqueous HCl, brine, 5% NaHCO3, and brine, dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography [EtOAc/petroleum ether (bp 40–60 °C), 2:8].

(R)-Methyl 2-(2-(7-phenylheptanamido)hexanamido)acetate (6). Yield 77%; Colorless oil; + 33.0 (c 1.00, CH3OH); 1H–NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): δ 7.72 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H, NH), 7.33–7.07 (m, 5H, arom), 6.91 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H, NH), 4.63 (dt, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, NHCH), 4.19–3.81 (m, 2H, NHCH2), 3.68 (s, 3H, COOCH3), 2.57 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, CH2), 2.19 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, NHCOCH2), 1.92–1.45 (m, 6H, CH2), 1.44–1.16 (m, 8H, CH2), 0.87 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H, CH3); 13C–NMR (CDCl3, 50 MHz): δ 173.3, 172.8, 169.8, 142.4, 128.5, 128.0, 125.4, 52.6, 52.0, 40.9, 36.1, 35.7, 32.2, 31.6, 28.9, 28.8, 27.4, 25.4, 22.3, 13.8; MS (ESI) m/z (%): 391.14 (92) [M + H]+; Anal. Calcd for C22H34N2O4: C, 67.66; H, 8.78; N, 7.17. Found: C, 67.49; H, 8.97; N, 7.03.

(R)-Methyl 4-(2-(2-benzamidoacetamido)acetamido)octanoate (10). Yield 62%; Yellow oil; + 1.5 (c 1.00, CHCl3); 1H–NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): δ 8.19–8.02 (m, 1H, NH), 7.87–7.67 (m, 3H, NH & arom), 7.51–7.24 (m, 3H, NH & arom), 7.03–6.86 (m, 1H, arom), 4.03 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 2H, NHCH2), 3.85 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 2H, NHCH2), 3.75–3.69 (m, 1H, NHCH), 3.53 (s, 3H, COOCH3), 2.26 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H, CH2COO), 1.92–1.52 (m, 2H, NHCHCH2), 1.48–1.03 (m, 6H, CH2), 0.87–0.65 (m, 3H, CH3); 13C–NMR (CDCl3, 50 MHz): δ 174.1, 170.1, 168.8, 168.3, 132.9, 131.8, 128.4, 127.2, 51.5, 49.0, 43.9, 43.0, 34.5, 30.5, 29.7, 27.9, 22.4, 13.8; MS (ESI) m/z (%): 392.14 (90) [M + H]+; Anal. Calcd for C20H29N3O5: C, 61.36; H, 7.47; N, 10.73. Found: C, 61.15; H, 7.74; N, 10.54.

(R)-Methyl 2-(2-(2-benzamidoacetamido)acetamido)hexanoate (13a). Yield 53%; White solid; mp 140–142 °C; + 18.6 (c 1.02, CHCl3); 1H–NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): δ 7.95–7.66 (m, 4H, NH & arom), 7.52–7.27 (m, 4H, arom), 4.45 (dt, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, NHCH), 4.10 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 2H, NHCH2), 4.06–3.82 (m, 2H, NHCH2), 3.63 (s, 3H, COOCH3), 1.86–1.49 (m, 2H, NHCHCH2), 1.34–1.09 (m, 4H, CH2), 0.80 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H, CH3); 13C–NMR (CDCl3, 50 MHz): δ 173.0, 170.2, 169.2, 168.1, 133.2, 131.7, 128.4, 127.2, 52.4, 52.2, 43.7, 42.8, 31.4, 27.4, 22.1, 13.7; MS (ESI) m/z (%): 364.09 (90) [M + Η]+; Anal. Calcd for C18H25N3O5: C, 59.49; H, 6.93; N, 11.56. Found: C, 59.40; H, 7.03; N, 11.47.

(S)-Methyl 2-(2-(2-benzamidoacetamido)acetamido)hexanoate (13b). Yield 68%; White solid; mp 139–141 °C; − 18.0 (c 1.00, CHCl3); 1H–NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): δ 8.04 (t, J = 4.9 Hz, 1H, NH), 7.88 (t, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H, NH), 7.83–7.69 (m, 2H, NH & arom), 7.62–7.46 (m, 1H, arom), 7.45–7.19 (m, 3H, arom), 4.40 (dt, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, NHCH), 4.06 (d, J = 4.7 Hz, 2H, NHCH2), 4.00–3.80 (m, 2H, NHCH2), 3.59 (s, 3H, COOCH3), 1.86–1.47 (m, 2H, NHCHCH2), 1.32–1.05 (m, 4H, CH2), 0.77 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H, CH3); 13C–NMR (CDCl3, 50 MHz): δ 173.0, 170.2, 169.2, 168.1, 133.1, 131.6, 128.2, 127.2, 52.3, 52.0, 43.6, 42.7, 31.3, 27.4, 22.0, 13.6; MS (ESI) m/z (%): 364.04 (90) [M + Η]+; Anal. Calcd for C18H25N3O5: C, 59.49; H, 6.93; N, 11.56. Found: C, 59.20; H, 7.15; N, 11.35.

(R)-tert-Butyl 9-butyl-1,4,7,10-tetraoxo-1-phenyl-2,5,8,11-tetraazatridecan-13-oate (15a). Yield 92%; White solid; mp 177–178 °C; + 11.0 (c 1.00, CH3OH); 1H–NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): δ 8.25–8.07 (m, 1H, NH), 8.05–7.94 (m, 1H, NH), 7.93–7.76 (m, 3H, NH & arom), 7.75–7.58 (m, 1H, arom), 7.55–7.29 (m, 3H, arom), 4.96–4.74 (m, 1H, NHCH), 4.43–4.25 (m, 2H, NHCH2), 4.22–4.03 (m, 2H, NHCH2), 4.01–3.71 (m, 2H, NHCH2), 1.94–1.49 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.40 (s, 9H, CH3), 1.33–1.10 (m, 4H, CH2), 0.81 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H, CH3); 13C–NMR (CDCl3, 50 MHz): δ 172.2, 169.6, 168.7, 168.5, 167.9, 133.5, 131.6, 128.3, 127.4, 81.9, 53.0, 43.5, 41.9, 33.1, 27.9, 27.5, 25.9, 22.4, 13.9; MS (ESI) m/z (%): 463.22 (90) [M + Η]+; Anal. Calcd for C23H34N4O6: C, 59.72; H, 7.41; N, 12.11. Found: C, 59.44; H, 7.70; N, 11.93.

4.1.2. Saponification of Methyl Esters

To a stirred solution of a methyl ester (1.0 mmol) in water, 1 N aqueous NaOH (1 mL, 1.0 mmol) was added and the mixture was left under stirring overnight at room temperature. After the completion of the reaction, the mixture was washed with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL), acidified with 1 N aqueous HCl to pH 1 and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure.

(R)-2-(2-(7-Phenylheptanamido)hexanamido)acetic acid (7). Yield 83%; White oil; + 15.0 (c 1.00, CH3OH); 1H–NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): δ 9.67 (br s, 1H, COOH), 7.72–7.45 (m, 2H, NH), 7.36–6.99 (m, 5H, arom), 4.76–4.51 (m, 1H, NHCH), 4.13–3.86 (br s, 2H, NHCH2), 2.69–2.39 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.31–2.05 (m, 2H, NHCOCH2), 1.92–1.45 (m, 6H, CH2), 1.41–1.05 (m, 8H, CH2), 0.96–0.69 (m, 3H, CH3); 13C–NMR (CDCl3, 50 MHz): δ 174.3, 172.9, 172.0, 142.5, 128.2, 128.1, 125.5, 52.8, 41.2, 36.1, 35.7, 32.1, 31.2, 28.9, 28.9, 27.4, 25.5, 22.2, 13.8; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C21H33N2O4 [M + H]+: 377.2435. Found: 377.2438; Anal. Calcd for C21H32N2O4: C, 66.99; H, 8.57; N, 7.44. Found: C, 66.72; H, 8.86; N, 7.27.

(R)-4-(2-(2-Benzamidoacetamido)acetamido)octanoic acid (11). Yield 88%; White solid; mp 202–204 °C; + 4.0 (c 1.00, CH3OH); 1H–NMR (D2O, 200 MHz): δ 7.89–7.70 (m, 2H, arom), 7.68–7.41 (m, 3H, arom), 4.07 (s, 2H, NHCH2), 3.88 (s, 2H, NHCH2), 3.82–3.64 (m, 1H, NHCH), 2.10 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H, CH2COOH), 1.93–1.06 (m, 8H, CH2), 0.89–0.66 (m, 3H, CH3); 13C–NMR (D2O, 50 MHz): δ 182.9, 172.4, 171.4, 170.9, 132.7, 132.5, 128.9, 127.4, 50.0, 34.2, 33.6, 31.2, 27.5, 21.9, 13.4; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C19H28N3O5 [M + H]+: 378.2023. Found: 378.2025; Anal. Calcd for C19H27N3O5: C, 60.46; H, 7.21; N, 11.13. Found: C, 60.25; H, 7.42; N, 11.01.

(R)-2-(2-(2-Benzamidoacetamido)acetamido)hexanoic acid (14a). Yield 93%; White solid; mp 213–215 °C; + 8.6 (c 1.00, CH3OH); 1H–NMR (DMSO, 200 MHz): δ 8.84 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H, NH), 8.19 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H, NH), 8.05–7.70 (m, 3H, NH & arom), 7.58–7.24 (m, 3H, arom), 4.22–4.02 (m, 1H, NHCH), 3.85 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H, NHCH2), 3.72 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H, NHCH2), 1.76–1.43 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.35–1.01 (m, 4H, CH2), 0.79 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H, CH3); 13C–NMR (DMSO, 50 MHz): δ 173.6, 169.3, 168.8, 166.7, 133.9, 131.5, 128.3, 127.4, 51.8, 42.9, 41.8 30.8, 27.5, 21.8, 13.8; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C17H24N3O5 [M + H]+: 350.1710. Found: 350.1711; Anal. Calcd for C17H23N3O5: C, 58.44; H, 6.64; N, 12.03. Found: C, 58.22; H, 6.86; N, 11.87.

(S)-2-(2-(2-Benzamidoacetamido)acetamido)hexanoic acid (14b). Yield 91%; White solid; mp 192–201 °C; − 8.1 (c 1.08, CH3OH); 1H–NMR (CDCl3 and drops CD3OD, 200 MHz): δ 7.82–7.58 (m, 1H, arom), 7.53–7.14 (m, 4H, arom), 4.38–4.21 (m, 1H, NHCH), 4.05 (s, 2H, NHCH2), 3.96 (s, 2H, NHCH2), 1.87–1.43 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.34–1.09 (m, 4H, CH2), 0.75 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H, CH3); 13C–NMR (DMSO, 50 MHz): δ 173.8, 168.9, 169.0, 166.5, 134.3, 131.8, 128.7, 127.0, 51.4, 43.2, 41.1 31.2, 27.3, 21.2, 13.4; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C17H24N3O5 [M + H]+: 350.1710. Found: 350.1712; Anal. Calcd for C17H23N3O5: C, 58.44; H, 6.64; N, 12.03. Found: C, 58.24; H, 6.82; N, 11.90.

4.1.3. Cleavage of tert-Butyl Protecting Group

A solution of the tert-butyl ester derivative (1 mmol) in 50% TFA/CH2Cl2 (0.5 M) was stirred for 2 h at room temperature. After the completion of the reaction, the organic solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by recrystallization.

(R)-9-Butyl-1,4,7,10-tetraoxo-1-phenyl-2,5,8,11-tetraazatridecan-13-oic acid (16a). Yield 87%; White solid; mp 195–206 °C; + 20.0 (c 1.00, CH3OH); 1H–NMR (CD3OD, 200 MHz): δ 7.91–7.77 (m, 2H, arom), 7.59–7.35 (m, 3H, arom), 4.45–4.32 (m, 1H, NHCH), 4.26 (s, 2H, NHCH2), 4.05 (s, 2H, NHCH2), 3.90 (s, 2H, NHCH2), 1.97–1.57 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.41–1.16 (m, 4H, CH2), 0.86 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H, CH3); 13C–NMR (CD3OD, 50 MHz): δ 173.2, 171.8, 171.2, 170.2, 169.2, 133.3, 132.2, 128.7, 127.5, 53.6, 43.7, 42.9, 31.6, 28.0, 22.4, 22.3, 13.9; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C19H27N4O6 [M + H]+: 407.1925. Found: 407.1927; Anal. Calcd for C19H26N4O6: C, 56.15; H, 6.45; N, 13.79. Found: C, 55.84; H, 6.62; N, 13.65.

4.2. Biology

4.2.1. Cell Culture

The methods used for the isolation, characterization and cultivation of rat renal mesangial cells have been previously described in details [29]. Confluent cells were incubated in 24-well-plates for 4 h in serum-free DMEM including 0.1 mg/mL of fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin. Subsequently, cells were preincubated for 20 min either with the vehicle or the indicated concentrations of the various inhibitors prior to stimulation with IL1β (1 nM) plus Fk (5 μM) in the presence of the inhibitors for 24 h. The total stimulation volume per well was 500 μL. Cell supernatants were taken for PGE2 quantification.

4.2.2. Quantification of Prostaglandin E2

A PGE2-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (from Enzo Life Science, Lörrach, Germany) was used for the quantification of PGE2 in the cell culture supernatants. 100 μL of the supernatants were processed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

4.2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis of data was performed using one-way ANOVA following Bonferroni post-hoc test for multiple comparisons.