Qianxing Mo1,2, Fotis Nikolos3, Fengju Chen2, Zoe Tramel3, Yu-Cheng Lee3, Kazukuni Hayashi3, Jing Xiao3, Jianjun Shen4, Keith Syson Chan3,5. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX. 2. Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX. 3. Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX. 4. Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX. 5. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine (STaR) Center, Center for Drug Discovery, and Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Abstract
Background: Muscle-invasive bladder cancers (MIBCs) cause approximately 150 000 deaths per year worldwide. Survival for MIBC patients is heterogeneous, with no clinically validated molecular markers that predict clinical outcome. Non-MIBCs (NMIBCs) generally have favorable outcome; however, a portion progress to MIBC. Hence, development of a prognostic tool that can guide decision-making is crucial for improving clinical management of bladder urothelial carcinomas. Methods: Tumor grade is defined by pathologic evaluation of tumor cell differentiation, and it often associates with clinical outcome. The current study extrapolates this conventional wisdom and combines it with molecular profiling. We developed an 18-gene signature that molecularly defines urothelial cellular differentiation, thus classifying MIBCs and NMIBCs into two subgroups: basal and differentiated. We evaluated the prognostic capability of this "tumor differentiation signature" and three other existing gene signatures including the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; 2707 genes), MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDA; 2252 genes/2697 probes), and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC; 47 genes) using five gene expression data sets derived from MIBC and NMIBC patients. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The tumor differentiation signature demonstrated consistency and statistical robustness toward stratifying MIBC patients into different overall survival outcomes (TCGA cohort 1, P = .03; MDA discovery, P = .009; MDA validation, P = .01), while the other signatures were not as consistent. In addition, we analyzed the progression (Ta/T1 progressing to ≥T2) probability of NMIBCs. NMIBC patients with a basal tumor differentiation signature associated with worse progression outcome (P = .008). Gene functional term enrichment and gene set enrichment analyses revealed that genes involved in the biologic process of immune response and inflammatory response are among the most elevated within basal bladder cancers, implicating them as candidates for immune checkpoint therapies. Conclusions: These results provide definitive evidence that a biology-prioritizing clustering methodology generates meaningful insights into patient stratification and reveals targetable molecular pathways to impact future therapeutic approach.
Background: Muscle-invasive bladder cancers (MIBCs) cause approximately 150 000 deaths per year worldwide. Survival for MIBCpatients is heterogeneous, with no clinically validated molecular markers that predict clinical outcome. Non-MIBCs (NMIBCs) generally have favorable outcome; however, a portion progress to MIBC. Hence, development of a prognostic tool that can guide decision-making is crucial for improving clinical management of bladder urothelial carcinomas. Methods:Tumor grade is defined by pathologic evaluation of tumor cell differentiation, and it often associates with clinical outcome. The current study extrapolates this conventional wisdom and combines it with molecular profiling. We developed an 18-gene signature that molecularly defines urothelial cellular differentiation, thus classifying MIBCs and NMIBCs into two subgroups: basal and differentiated. We evaluated the prognostic capability of this "tumor differentiation signature" and three other existing gene signatures including the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; 2707 genes), MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDA; 2252 genes/2697 probes), and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC; 47 genes) using five gene expression data sets derived from MIBC and NMIBC patients. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The tumor differentiation signature demonstrated consistency and statistical robustness toward stratifying MIBCpatients into different overall survival outcomes (TCGA cohort 1, P = .03; MDA discovery, P = .009; MDA validation, P = .01), while the other signatures were not as consistent. In addition, we analyzed the progression (Ta/T1 progressing to ≥T2) probability of NMIBCs. NMIBC patients with a basal tumor differentiation signature associated with worse progression outcome (P = .008). Gene functional term enrichment and gene set enrichment analyses revealed that genes involved in the biologic process of immune response and inflammatory response are among the most elevated within basal bladder cancers, implicating them as candidates for immune checkpoint therapies. Conclusions: These results provide definitive evidence that a biology-prioritizing clustering methodology generates meaningful insights into patient stratification and reveals targetable molecular pathways to impact future therapeutic approach.
Authors: Jonathan E Rosenberg; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Tom Powles; Michiel S van der Heijden; Arjun V Balar; Andrea Necchi; Nancy Dawson; Peter H O'Donnell; Ani Balmanoukian; Yohann Loriot; Sandy Srinivas; Margitta M Retz; Petros Grivas; Richard W Joseph; Matthew D Galsky; Mark T Fleming; Daniel P Petrylak; Jose Luis Perez-Gracia; Howard A Burris; Daniel Castellano; Christina Canil; Joaquim Bellmunt; Dean Bajorin; Dorothee Nickles; Richard Bourgon; Garrett M Frampton; Na Cui; Sanjeev Mariathasan; Oyewale Abidoye; Gregg D Fine; Robert Dreicer Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Arjun V Balar; Matthew D Galsky; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Thomas Powles; Daniel P Petrylak; Joaquim Bellmunt; Yohann Loriot; Andrea Necchi; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Jose Luis Perez-Gracia; Nancy A Dawson; Michiel S van der Heijden; Robert Dreicer; Sandy Srinivas; Margitta M Retz; Richard W Joseph; Alexandra Drakaki; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Srikala S Sridhar; David I Quinn; Ignacio Durán; David R Shaffer; Bernhard J Eigl; Petros D Grivas; Evan Y Yu; Shi Li; Edward E Kadel; Zachary Boyd; Richard Bourgon; Priti S Hegde; Sanjeev Mariathasan; AnnChristine Thåström; Oyewale O Abidoye; Gregg D Fine; Dean F Bajorin Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-12-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Anneleen Daemen; Obi L Griffith; Laura M Heiser; Nicholas J Wang; Oana M Enache; Zachary Sanborn; Francois Pepin; Steffen Durinck; James E Korkola; Malachi Griffith; Joe S Hur; Nam Huh; Jongsuk Chung; Leslie Cope; Mary Jo Fackler; Christopher Umbricht; Saraswati Sukumar; Pankaj Seth; Vikas P Sukhatme; Lakshmi R Jakkula; Yiling Lu; Gordon B Mills; Raymond J Cho; Eric A Collisson; Laura J van't Veer; Paul T Spellman; Joe W Gray Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2013 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Vipulkumar Dadhania; Miao Zhang; Li Zhang; Jolanta Bondaruk; Tadeusz Majewski; Arlene Siefker-Radtke; Charles C Guo; Colin Dinney; David E Cogdell; Shizhen Zhang; Sangkyou Lee; June G Lee; John N Weinstein; Keith Baggerly; David McConkey; Bogdan Czerniak Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 8.143
Authors: Seth P Lerner; David J McConkey; Katherine A Hoadley; Keith S Chan; William Y Kim; François Radvanyi; Mattias Höglund; Francisco X Real Journal: Bladder Cancer Date: 2016-01-07
Authors: Yu-Cheng Lee; Hung-Ming Lam; Charles Rosser; Dan Theodorescu; William C Parks; Keith Syson Chan Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 16.430
Authors: Patrick J Hensley; Natasha Kyprianou; Matthew S Purdom; Daheng He; Vincent DiCarlo; Chi Wang; Andrew C James Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 2.954