Takefumi Kamakura1,2, Jennifer T O'Malley1, Joseph B Nadol1,2. 1. Otopathology Laboratory, Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary. 2. Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS: This study evaluates the degree of preservation of hair cells, supporting cells, and innervating dendritic processes after cochlear implantation in the human using immunohistochemical methods. BACKGROUND: Surgical insertion of a cochlear implant electrode induces various pathologic changes within the cochlea including insertional trauma, foreign body response, inflammation, fibrosis, and neo-osteogenesis. These changes may result in loss of residual acoustic hearing, adversely affecting the use of hybrid implants, and may result in loss of putative precursor cells, limiting the success of future regenerative protocols. METHODS: Twenty-eight celloidin-embedded temporal bones from 14 patients with bilateral severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss and unilateral cochlear implants were studied. Two sections including the modiolus or basal turn from each temporal bone were stained using antineurofilament, antimyosin-VIIa, and antitubulin antibodies in both the implanted and unimplanted ears. RESULTS: Inner and outer hair cells: Immunoreactivity was reduced throughout the implanted cochlea and in the unimplanted cochlea with the exception of the apical turn.Dendritic processes in the osseous spiral lamina: Immunoreactivity was significantly less along the electrode of the implanted cochlea than in the other segments.Inner and outer pillars, inner and outer spiral bundles, and Deiters' cells: Immunoreactivity was similar in the implanted and unimplanted cochleae. CONCLUSION: Insertion of a cochlear implant electrode may significantly affect the inner and outer hair cells both along and apical to the electrode, and dendritic processes in the osseous spiral lamina along the electrode. There was less effect on pillar cells, Deiters' cells, and spiral bundles.
HYPOTHESIS: This study evaluates the degree of preservation of hair cells, supporting cells, and innervating dendritic processes after cochlear implantation in the human using immunohistochemical methods. BACKGROUND: Surgical insertion of a cochlear implant electrode induces various pathologic changes within the cochlea including insertional trauma, foreign body response, inflammation, fibrosis, and neo-osteogenesis. These changes may result in loss of residual acoustic hearing, adversely affecting the use of hybrid implants, and may result in loss of putative precursor cells, limiting the success of future regenerative protocols. METHODS: Twenty-eight celloidin-embedded temporal bones from 14 patients with bilateral severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss and unilateral cochlear implants were studied. Two sections including the modiolus or basal turn from each temporal bone were stained using antineurofilament, antimyosin-VIIa, and antitubulin antibodies in both the implanted and unimplanted ears. RESULTS: Inner and outer hair cells: Immunoreactivity was reduced throughout the implanted cochlea and in the unimplanted cochlea with the exception of the apical turn.Dendritic processes in the osseous spiral lamina: Immunoreactivity was significantly less along the electrode of the implanted cochlea than in the other segments.Inner and outer pillars, inner and outer spiral bundles, and Deiters' cells: Immunoreactivity was similar in the implanted and unimplanted cochleae. CONCLUSION: Insertion of a cochlear implant electrode may significantly affect the inner and outer hair cells both along and apical to the electrode, and dendritic processes in the osseous spiral lamina along the electrode. There was less effect on pillar cells, Deiters' cells, and spiral bundles.
Authors: Adrien A Eshraghi; Dustin M Lang; Jonathan Roell; Thomas R Van De Water; Carolyn Garnham; Helio Rodrigues; Mateo Guardiola; Chhavi Gupta; Jeenu Mittal Journal: Acta Otolaryngol Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 1.494
Authors: Jennifer T O'Malley; Barbara J Burgess; Diane D Jones; Joe C Adams; Saumil N Merchant Journal: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 1.547
Authors: Bruce J Gantz; Marlan R Hansen; Christopher W Turner; Jacob J Oleson; Lina A Reiss; Aaron J Parkinson Journal: Audiol Neurootol Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 1.854
Authors: Alicia M Quesnel; Hideko Heidi Nakajima; John J Rosowski; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Joseph B Nadol Journal: Hear Res Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 3.208
Authors: Arianna Di Stadio; Antonio Della Volpe; Massimo Ralli; Fiammetta Korsch; Antonio Greco; Giampietro Ricci Journal: J Int Adv Otol Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 1.017
Authors: Tadao Okayasu; Alicia M Quesnel; Jennifer T O'Malley; Takefumi Kamakura; Joseph B Nadol Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Walter H Moos; Douglas V Faller; Ioannis P Glavas; David N Harpp; Michael H Irwin; Iphigenia Kanara; Carl A Pinkert; Whitney R Powers; Kosta Steliou; Demetrios G Vavvas; Krishna Kodukula Journal: Biores Open Access Date: 2018-07-01