Literature DB >> 29341426

Biomechanical, histological, and computed X-ray tomographic analyses of hydroxyapatite coated PEEK implants in an extended healing model in rabbit.

Pär Johansson1, Sargon Barkarmo2, Mohammed Hawthan3, Niccolò Peruzzi4, Per Kjellin5, Ann Wennerberg2.   

Abstract

A nanosized hydroxyapatite (HA) modification on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) using a novel spin coating technique was investigated in a rabbit model. Spin coating technique creates a 20-40 nm thick layer of nanosized HA particles with similar shape, size, and crystallinity as human bone. Some implants were designed with a perforating hole in the apical region to mimic a fusion chamber of a spinal implant. The coating nano-structures were assessed using a scanning electron microscope. The in vivo response to HA-PEEK was compared to untreated PEEK with respect to removal torque, histomorphometry, and computed microtomography. The HA-coated and pure PEEK implants were inserted in the tibia and femur bone according to simple randomization. The rabbits were sacrificed 20 weeks after implantation. Removal torque analysis showed significantly higher values for HA-PEEK. Qualitative histological evaluation revealed an intimate contact between PEEK and the bone at the threads and perforated hole. Histomorphometric assessment showed higher bone-implant and bone area values for HA-PEEK but without statistical significance. The effect of the HA coating showed most prominent effect in the removal torque which may be correlated to an alteration in the bone quality around the HA-PEEK implants.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 106A: 1440-1447, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HA; histology; hydroxyapatite; in vivo; osseointegration; polyether ether ketone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29341426     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  6 in total

1.  Waiting for Aπαταω: 250 Years Later.

Authors:  Victoria Wu; Vuk Uskoković
Journal:  Found Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 1.238

2.  A Pilot Study with Randomised Controlled Design Comparing TiZr Alloy Dental Implants to Ti Implants.

Authors:  Kristina Hultin; Annelie Eriksson; Christina Backe; Ulf Johansson; Kostas Bougas
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2020-12-31

Review 3.  Bioinspired Modifications of PEEK Implants for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Xinming Gu; Xiaolin Sun; Yue Sun; Jia Wang; Yiping Liu; Kaixuan Yu; Yao Wang; Yanmin Zhou
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-12

Review 4.  Strategies to improve bioactive and antibacterial properties of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for use as orthopedic implants.

Authors:  Zhi Zheng; Pengjia Liu; Xingmin Zhang; Xiaosong Zou; Xiaohan Mei; Shuling Zhang; Shaokun Zhang
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-08-19

5.  Two-year results of a double-blind multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) versus silicon nitride spinal fusion cages in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders.

Authors:  Bryan J McEntire; Greg Maslin; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-09

6.  Evaluation of the Grafting Efficacy of Active Biomolecules of Phosphatidylcholine and Type I Collagen on Polyether Ether Ketone: In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Jian-Chih Chen; Chih-Hua Chen; Kai-Chi Chang; Shih-Ming Liu; Chia-Ling Ko; Chi-Jen Shih; Ying-Sui Sun; Wen-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.329

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.