Sara Acciuffi1, Frank Meyer1, Astrid Bauschke2, Utz Settmacher2, Hans Lippert1, Roland Croner1, Annelore Altendorf-Hofmann3. 1. Department of General, Abdominal and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany. 2. Department of General, Abdominal and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. 3. Department of General, Abdominal and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. annelore.altendorf-hofmann@gmx.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The investigation of the predictors of outcome after hepatic resection for solitary colorectal liver metastasis. METHODS: We recruited 350 patients with solitary colorectal liver metastasis at the University Hospitals of Jena and Magdeburg, who underwent curative liver resection between 1993 and 2014. All patients had follow-up until death or till summer 2016. RESULTS: The follow-up data concern 96.6% of observed patients. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 47 and 28%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 30 and 20%, respectively. The analysis of the prognostic factors revealed that the pT category of primary tumour, size and grade of the metastasis and extension of the liver resection had no statistically significant impact on survival and recurrence rates. In multivariate analysis, age, status of lymph node metastasis at the primary tumour, location of primary tumour, time of appearance of the metastasis, the use of preoperative chemotherapy and the presence of extrahepatic tumour proved to be independent statistically significant predictors for the prognosis. Moreover, patients with rectal cancer had a lower intrahepatic recurrence rate, but a higher extrahepatic recurrence rate. CONCLUSION: The long-term follow-up of patients with R0-resected liver metastasis is multifactorially influenced. Age and comorbidity have a role only in the overall survival. More than three lymph node metastasis reduced both the overall and disease-free survival. Extrahepatic tumour had a negative influence on the extrahepatic recurrence and on the overall survival. Neither overall survival nor recurrence rates was improved using neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
PURPOSE: The investigation of the predictors of outcome after hepatic resection for solitary colorectal liver metastasis. METHODS: We recruited 350 patients with solitary colorectal liver metastasis at the University Hospitals of Jena and Magdeburg, who underwent curative liver resection between 1993 and 2014. All patients had follow-up until death or till summer 2016. RESULTS: The follow-up data concern 96.6% of observed patients. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 47 and 28%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 30 and 20%, respectively. The analysis of the prognostic factors revealed that the pT category of primary tumour, size and grade of the metastasis and extension of the liver resection had no statistically significant impact on survival and recurrence rates. In multivariate analysis, age, status of lymph node metastasis at the primary tumour, location of primary tumour, time of appearance of the metastasis, the use of preoperative chemotherapy and the presence of extrahepatic tumour proved to be independent statistically significant predictors for the prognosis. Moreover, patients with rectal cancer had a lower intrahepatic recurrence rate, but a higher extrahepatic recurrence rate. CONCLUSION: The long-term follow-up of patients with R0-resected liver metastasis is multifactorially influenced. Age and comorbidity have a role only in the overall survival. More than three lymph node metastasis reduced both the overall and disease-free survival. Extrahepatic tumour had a negative influence on the extrahepatic recurrence and on the overall survival. Neither overall survival nor recurrence rates was improved using neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Authors: Michael D'Angelica; Peter Kornprat; Mithat Gonen; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; Leslie H Blumgart; William R Jarnagin Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Timothy M Pawlik; Charles R Scoggins; Daria Zorzi; Eddie K Abdalla; Axel Andres; Cathy Eng; Steven A Curley; Evelyne M Loyer; Andrea Muratore; Gilles Mentha; Lorenzo Capussotti; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Hyuk Hur; Yong Taek Ko; Byung Soh Min; Kyung Sik Kim; Jin Sub Choi; Seung Kook Sohn; Chang Hwan Cho; Heung Kyu Ko; Jong Tai Lee; Nam Kyu Kim Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2008-09-11 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: S K P John; S M Robinson; S Rehman; B Harrison; A Vallance; J J French; B C Jaques; R M Charnley; D M Manas; S A White Journal: Dig Surg Date: 2013-08-21 Impact factor: 2.588
Authors: Cornelis J H van de Velde; Petra G Boelens; Josep M Borras; Jan-Willem Coebergh; Andres Cervantes; Lennart Blomqvist; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Colette B M van den Broek; Gina Brown; Eric Van Cutsem; Eloy Espin; Karin Haustermans; Bengt Glimelius; Lene H Iversen; J Han van Krieken; Corrie A M Marijnen; Geoffrey Henning; Jola Gore-Booth; Elisa Meldolesi; Pawel Mroczkowski; Iris Nagtegaal; Peter Naredi; Hector Ortiz; Lars Påhlman; Philip Quirke; Claus Rödel; Arnaud Roth; Harm Rutten; Hans J Schmoll; Jason J Smith; Pieter J Tanis; Claire Taylor; Arne Wibe; Theo Wiggers; Maria A Gambacorta; Cynthia Aristei; Vincenzo Valentini Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: S Acciuffi; F Meyer; A Bauschke; R Croner; U Settmacher; A Altendorf-Hofmann Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 4.553