Orna Reges1,2, Philip Greenland3,4, Dror Dicker5,6,7, Morton Leibowitz1,8, Moshe Hoshen1, Ilan Gofer1, Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik3, Ran D Balicer1,9. 1. Clalit Research Institute, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel. 2. Department of Health Systems Management, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel. 3. Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 4. Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 5. Internal Medicine Department D and EASO Collaborating Center for Obesity Management at Hasharon Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel. 6. Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 7. Bariatric Center, Herzliya Medical Center, Herzliya, Israel. 8. Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York. 9. Public Health Department, School of Public Health, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Abstract
Importance: Bariatric surgery is an effective and safe approach for weight loss and short-term improvement in metabolic disorders such as diabetes. However, studies have been limited in most settings by lack of a nonsurgical group, losses to follow-up, missing data, and small sample sizes in clinical trials and observational studies. Objective: To assess the association of 3 common types of bariatric surgery compared with nonsurgical treatment with mortality and other clinical outcomes among obese patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study in a large Israeli integrated health fund covering 54% of Israeli citizens with less than 1% turnover of members annually. Obese adult patients who underwent bariatric surgery between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2014, were selected and compared with obese nonsurgical patients matched on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and diabetes, with a final follow-up date of December 31, 2015. A total of 33 540 patients were included in this study. Exposures: Bariatric surgery (laparoscopic banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy) or usual care obesity management only (provided by a primary care physician and which may include dietary counseling and behavior modification). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome, all-cause mortality, matched and adjusted for BMI prior to surgery, age, sex, socioeconomic status, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and smoking. Results: The study population included 8385 patients who underwent bariatric surgery (median age, 46 [IQR, 37-54] years; 5490 [65.5%] women; baseline median BMI, 40.6 [IQR, 38.5-43.7]; laparoscopic banding [n = 3635], gastric bypass [n = 1388], laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy [n = 3362], and 25 155 nonsurgical matched patients (median age, 46 [IQR, 37-54] years; 16 470 [65.5%] women; baseline median BMI, 40.5 [IQR, 37.0-43.5]). The availability of follow-up data was 100% for all-cause mortality. There were 105 deaths (1.3%) among surgical patients during a median follow-up of 4.3 (IQR, 2.8-6.6) years (including 61 [1.7%] who underwent laparoscopic banding, 18 [1.3%] gastric bypass, and 26 [0.8%] sleeve gastrectomy), and 583 deaths (2.3%) among nonsurgical patients during a median follow-up of 4.0 (IQR, 2.6-6.2) years. The absolute difference was 2.51 (95% CI, 1.86-3.15) fewer deaths/1000 person-years in the surgical vs nonsurgical group. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality among nonsurgical vs surgical patients were 2.02 (95% CI, 1.63-2.52) for the entire study population; by surgical type, HRs were 2.01 (95% CI, 1.50-2.69) for laparoscopic banding, 2.65 (95% CI, 1.55-4.52) for gastric bypass, and 1.60 (95% CI, 1.02-2.51) for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Conclusions and Relevance: Among obese patients in a large integrated health fund in Israel, bariatric surgery using laparoscopic banding, gastric bypass, or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, compared with usual care nonsurgical obesity management, was associated with lower all-cause mortality over a median follow-up of approximately 4.5 years. The evidence of this association adds to the limited literature describing beneficial outcomes of these 3 types of bariatric surgery compared with usual care obesity management alone.
Importance: Bariatric surgery is an effective and safe approach for weight loss and short-term improvement in metabolic disorders such as diabetes. However, studies have been limited in most settings by lack of a nonsurgical group, losses to follow-up, missing data, and small sample sizes in clinical trials and observational studies. Objective: To assess the association of 3 common types of bariatric surgery compared with nonsurgical treatment with mortality and other clinical outcomes among obesepatients. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study in a large Israeli integrated health fund covering 54% of Israeli citizens with less than 1% turnover of members annually. Obese adult patients who underwent bariatric surgery between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2014, were selected and compared with obese nonsurgical patients matched on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and diabetes, with a final follow-up date of December 31, 2015. A total of 33 540 patients were included in this study. Exposures: Bariatric surgery (laparoscopic banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy) or usual care obesity management only (provided by a primary care physician and which may include dietary counseling and behavior modification). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome, all-cause mortality, matched and adjusted for BMI prior to surgery, age, sex, socioeconomic status, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and smoking. Results: The study population included 8385 patients who underwent bariatric surgery (median age, 46 [IQR, 37-54] years; 5490 [65.5%] women; baseline median BMI, 40.6 [IQR, 38.5-43.7]; laparoscopic banding [n = 3635], gastric bypass [n = 1388], laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy [n = 3362], and 25 155 nonsurgical matched patients (median age, 46 [IQR, 37-54] years; 16 470 [65.5%] women; baseline median BMI, 40.5 [IQR, 37.0-43.5]). The availability of follow-up data was 100% for all-cause mortality. There were 105 deaths (1.3%) among surgical patients during a median follow-up of 4.3 (IQR, 2.8-6.6) years (including 61 [1.7%] who underwent laparoscopic banding, 18 [1.3%] gastric bypass, and 26 [0.8%] sleeve gastrectomy), and 583 deaths (2.3%) among nonsurgical patients during a median follow-up of 4.0 (IQR, 2.6-6.2) years. The absolute difference was 2.51 (95% CI, 1.86-3.15) fewer deaths/1000 person-years in the surgical vs nonsurgical group. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality among nonsurgical vs surgical patients were 2.02 (95% CI, 1.63-2.52) for the entire study population; by surgical type, HRs were 2.01 (95% CI, 1.50-2.69) for laparoscopic banding, 2.65 (95% CI, 1.55-4.52) for gastric bypass, and 1.60 (95% CI, 1.02-2.51) for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Conclusions and Relevance: Among obesepatients in a large integrated health fund in Israel, bariatric surgery using laparoscopic banding, gastric bypass, or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, compared with usual care nonsurgical obesity management, was associated with lower all-cause mortality over a median follow-up of approximately 4.5 years. The evidence of this association adds to the limited literature describing beneficial outcomes of these 3 types of bariatric surgery compared with usual care obesity management alone.
Authors: David E Arterburn; Maren K Olsen; Valerie A Smith; Edward H Livingston; Lynn Van Scoyoc; William S Yancy; George Eid; Hollis Weidenbacher; Matthew L Maciejewski Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Nancy Puzziferri; Thomas B Roshek; Helen G Mayo; Ryan Gallagher; Steven H Belle; Edward H Livingston Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ted D Adams; Lance E Davidson; Sheldon E Litwin; Jaewhan Kim; Ronette L Kolotkin; M Nazeem Nanjee; Jonathan M Gutierrez; Sara J Frogley; Anna R Ibele; Eliot A Brinton; Paul N Hopkins; Rodrick McKinlay; Steven C Simper; Steven C Hunt Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tomas Karpati; Chandra J Cohen-Stavi; Morton Leibowitz; Moshe Hoshen; Becca S Feldman; Ran D Balicer Journal: Popul Health Metr Date: 2014-10-30
Authors: Antonio E Pontiroli; Ahmed S Zakaria; Ermanno Mantegazza; Alberto Morabito; Alessandro Saibene; Enrico Mozzi; Giancarlo Micheletto Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2016-02-27 Impact factor: 9.951
Authors: Babak J Orandi; Joshua W Purvis; Robert M Cannon; A Blair Smith; Cora E Lewis; Norah A Terrault; Jayme E Locke Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2020-06-13 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik; Orna Reges; Philip Greenland; Dror Dicker; Morton Leibowitz; Adi Berliner Senderey; Moshe Hoshen; Ran D Balicer Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Gretchen E White; Anita P Courcoulas; Wendy C King; David R Flum; Susan Z Yanovski; Alfons Pomp; Bruce M Wolfe; Konstantinos Spaniolas; Walter Pories; Steven H Belle Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Amlish B Gondal; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Federico Serrot; Andrea Rodriguez-Restrepo; Audriana N Hurbon; Carlos Galvani; Iman Ghaderi Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 4.129