Femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) is a frequent cause for groin pain in young and active patients. We discovered a so far undescribed radiographic phenomenon only visible in frog-leg lateral radiographs. The aim of this study was to describe this new radiological sign, to determine its prevalence in a symptomatic population and to investigate the correlation to a potential underlying pathology. We retrospectively reviewed all patients, who had been sent to our clinic between 2010 and 2012 for hip complaints. We excluded patients older than 50 years and patients with advanced osteoarthritis. Two independent investigators blinded to clinical data independently examined all images for the presence, location and dimension of a vacuum phenomenon and a potential underlying hip pathology. We included 242 patients. 137 of them showed clinical and radiological signs of FAI. A hip vacuum phenomenon was identified in 20 of 242 patients (8%). Interestingly, all these patients showed distinct signs of femoro-acetabular impingement. In reference to this, the prevalence of the "Hip Vacuum Sign" was 15% (20/137) in symptomatic patients with FAI. There was no correlation with age or gender. We identified a new radiological sign, the "Hip Vacuum Sign", in 15% of symptomatic patients with FAI. It was only visible in frog-leg lateral radiographs. We suggest that it represents a subluxation of the femoral head due to a lever mechanism between the femoral neck and the acetabular rim and is, therefore, a hint for a relevant femoro-acetabular impingement mechanism.
Femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) is a frequent cause for groin pain in young and active patients. We discovered a so far undescribed radiographic phenomenon only visible in frog-leg lateral radiographs. The aim of this study was to describe this new radiological sign, to determine its prevalence in a symptomatic population and to investigate the correlation to a potential underlying pathology. We retrospectively reviewed all patients, who had been sent to our clinic between 2010 and 2012 for hip complaints. We excluded patients older than 50 years and patients with advanced osteoarthritis. Two independent investigators blinded to clinical data independently examined all images for the presence, location and dimension of a vacuum phenomenon and a potential underlying hip pathology. We included 242 patients. 137 of them showed clinical and radiological signs of FAI. A hip vacuum phenomenon was identified in 20 of 242 patients (8%). Interestingly, all these patients showed distinct signs of femoro-acetabular impingement. In reference to this, the prevalence of the "Hip Vacuum Sign" was 15% (20/137) in symptomatic patients with FAI. There was no correlation with age or gender. We identified a new radiological sign, the "Hip Vacuum Sign", in 15% of symptomatic patients with FAI. It was only visible in frog-leg lateral radiographs. We suggest that it represents a subluxation of the femoral head due to a lever mechanism between the femoral neck and the acetabular rim and is, therefore, a hint for a relevant femoro-acetabular impingement mechanism.
Femoro-acetabular impingment (FAI) is a risk factor for developing early labral and
cartilage damage with subsequent osteoarthritis of the hip joint. It has a high prevalence
in young and active patients and typically presents with activity related pain mainly in the
groin [1-3].FAI appears in different types: cam-type-lesions show a loss of the femoral head-neck
offset, while pincer-type-lesions usually present with acetabular overcoverage. These
anatomical abnormalities result in an early mechanical conflict between the acetabular rim
and the head-neck junction.Radiologic deformities that cause FAI are quiet common. They were found in 14–35% of
asymptomatic population [4]. In patients with
hip pain or symptomatic labral tears, the prevalence is up to 90% [5, 6].Diagnostic radiology plays a major role in identifying the underlying pathology and
conventional radiographs are standard in FAI diagnostics. Besides the obligatory
anterior-posterior view of the pelvis at least one further lateral projection is mandatory
to assess the structural abnormities of the femoral head/neck junction. In general, the
lateral cross table view has been established as a standard over the last years.
Alternatively the frog-leg lateral radiograph or the Dunn-view can be used.We use the frog-leg lateral view as the standard secondary plane because it was shown be
the most reliable to diagnose FAI compared to anterior-posterior and cross-table radiographs
and has a lower exposure of radiation than the cross-table view [7, 8].We noticed a so far unknown radiological sign in the joint cavity of frog-leg lateral
radiographs in hips of symptomatic non-arthritic young adults. The aim of this study was to
describe this new radiological sign and to determine the prevalence of this phenomenon in
symptomatic patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Patient data
We reviewed all patients who attended our out-patient clinic with hip complaints between
2010 and 2012. The radiographs were retrieved of from our Picture Archiving and
Communication System (PACS). All information about the patients, including their age,
gender and the medical history, were received from their medical records in our database.
Final diagnosis was made in carefully analyzing the association of patient history and
physical examination with radiographic imaging.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
We included all patients under 50 years of age without advanced osteoarthritis (Kellgren
and Lawrence (K&L) grade ≤ 2) of their hip joints with a complete set (a.p. and
frog-leg-lateral view) of high quality radiographs in our PACS. We excluded all patients
with a history of previous hip surgery or imported external taken radiographs due to
potential differences in the imaging technique.
Obtaining the radiographs
All radiographs were performed by orthopedic radiology technicians in our radiology
department. The anterior-posterior view of the pelvis was taken with the patient supine.
The X-ray beam was centered on the symphysis pubis in the vertical midline. The legs were
parallel with the feet slightly internal rotated and separated approximately one shoulder
width apart.The frog-leg lateral view was taken with the patient supine. The hip is in 45° flexion,
45° abduction and external rotation. The ipsilateral knee of the patient is flexed so the
bottom of the foot was placed on the contralateral leg at the level of the knee. The leg
then was externally rotated. The X-ray beam was directed from anterior to posterior and
centered on the femoral head (Fig. 1) [7].
Fig. 1.
Technique used performing radiographs
in the frog-leg lateral view.
Technique used performing radiographs
in the frog-leg lateral view.All radiographs were recorded due to a medical indication and informed consent for the
study was waived from the institutional review board.
Review and analysis of radiographs
All radiographs were independently reviewed for the occurrence and the morphology of a
vacuum phenomenon by two of the authors (N.M. and J.S.). They were blinded to clinical
data. The data was compared with the information provided in the patient’s records (age,
gender and diagnosis). The frequency of the “Hip Vacuum Sign”, the dimensions and the
average values in all radiographs were determined. Besides radiological signs for a FAI
were measured defined by an α angle >55° [9] and a femoral head-neck offset < 10 mm in lateral radiographs for cam
impingement and a lateral center edge angle > 39° for pincer impingement. Cohen’s kappa
test was performed to identify the intra- and the inter-observer variability.
Statistical section
A χ2-test was performed to identify whether women or men are
predominantly affected. A t-test was done to compare the ages of HVS
positive and HVS negative patients.
RESULTS
About 242 patients of 1465 screened patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most of most
patients were excluded because of age or advanced osteoarthritis (Fig. 2). We diagnosed a “Hip Vacuum Sign” (HVS) in 20 of these 242
patients (8.2%). The intra-observer variability was 0.99 and the inter-observer variability
was 0.98. The HVS was only detected in the frog-leg lateral view and typically presents as a
narrow and hypodense stripe situated in the central superior part of the joint cavity (Fig. 3). The size is variable with an average length
of 30.3 mm (±8.4 mm) and an average thickness of 0.6 mm (±0.1 mm). The different degrees in
presentation of the phenomenon are depicted in Fig.
4.
Fig.
2.
Pie chart displaying the distribution of included and excluded
patients.
Fig.
3.
Anterior-posterior and frog-leg lateral radiographs of a patient
with symptomatic femoro-acetabular impingement. While no vacuum phenomenon can be
found in the anterior-posterior radiograph (A) and in the magnified a.p.-view of the
right hip (B), a vacuum phenomenon appears in the frog-leg lateral projection
(C).
Fig.
4.
Frog-leg lateral radiographs show the different degree of
variation of this phenomenon. In most cases the vacuum sign appears as a narrow stripe
leading through the joint cavity like in A, C, D and E. Images F and B represent the
smallest (F) and largest (B) recognizable example of the
finding.
Pie chart displaying the distribution of included and excluded
patients.Anterior-posterior and frog-leg lateral radiographs of a patient
with symptomatic femoro-acetabular impingement. While no vacuum phenomenon can be
found in the anterior-posterior radiograph (A) and in the magnified a.p.-view of the
right hip (B), a vacuum phenomenon appears in the frog-leg lateral projection
(C).Frog-leg lateral radiographs show the different degree of
variation of this phenomenon. In most cases the vacuum sign appears as a narrow stripe
leading through the joint cavity like in A, C, D and E. Images F and B represent the
smallest (F) and largest (B) recognizable example of the
finding.One hundred and thirty-seven of the 242 patients showed clinical and radiologic signs of a
femoro-acetabular impingement. All radiographs revealing the HVS were in this subgroup of
patients and showed clinical and radiological features of a femoro-acetabular impingement.
Thus 20 of 137 FAI-cases presented the HVS (14.6%).In nine of these 20 HVS-positive patients, hip arthroscopy was performed in our clinic. In
all patients who underwent surgical correction of FAI, the HVS disappeared after surgery
(Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.
Frog-leg lateral
radiographs of two patients with symptomatic femoro-acetabular impingement. In (A),
the exemplary morphology of a hip with femoro-acetabular impingement is shown (e.g.
reduced femoral head neck offset). In (B), additionally, the hip vacuum sign is
visible as a narrow zone with lower density traversing through the joint cavity. In
(C), the same patient is shown after surgical correction of FAI. The HVS
disappeared.
Frog-leg lateral
radiographs of two patients with symptomatic femoro-acetabular impingement. In (A),
the exemplary morphology of a hip with femoro-acetabular impingement is shown (e.g.
reduced femoral head neck offset). In (B), additionally, the hip vacuum sign is
visible as a narrow zone with lower density traversing through the joint cavity. In
(C), the same patient is shown after surgical correction of FAI. The HVS
disappeared.By reviewing the medical records of HVS positive and HVS negative patients, we found no
significant difference in age between the two groups (38.5 in HVS positive vs. 38.9 in HVS
negative cases, P = 0.89, t-test). In addition, we found
no significant gender association with the hip vacuum phenomenon. Nine of the 20 patients
showing the HVS were female (45%, P = 0.75,
χ2-test).
DISCUSSION
We describe a new radiographic sign that we call the “Hip vacuum sign” and investigated the
prevalence in symptomatic patients. The HVS was seen in 20 of the 242 patients (8%).
Interestingly the radiological sign was only traceable in patients with femoro-acetabular
impingement with a prevalence of 14.6% (20 of 137).Vacuum phenomena are reported to appear in different joints e.g. the spine, shoulder or
knee [10-12]. They can
be observed studying joints under traction or in degenerative disorders. In some cases, like
in spine or shoulder, they are linked to instability of the joint [13, 14]. A vacuum
sign in the hip is well known to appear under traction during hip arthroscopy. Under these
conditions, traction forces between 400 and 600 N are usually required to generate the
vacuum phenomenon at the hip [15]. Forces may
be significantly less in situations of ligamentous laxity or hip instability [16, 17].Up to now, there exists no description of a vacuum sign at the hip joint simply caused by a
static leg position in the physiological range of motion like in the frog-leg lateral view.
We postulate that the vacuum phenomenon is caused due to a lever mechanism between the
acetabular rim and the femoral neck in femoro-acetabular impingement [4].In a recent study, the hip motion was visualized dynamically in extreme flexion, abduction
and external rotation using dynamic computed tomography and the results were compared with
intra-operative findings [18]. The authors
observed a subluxation of the femoral head in 40% of patients with anterior impingement and
70% of patients with posterior impingement. In addition, it was suggested that all FAI
subtypes and supraphysiological hip motions can lead to subluxation. This was confirmed by
Kolo et al. who observed a high rate of hip subluxation during dance
movements in end range hip motion, using MRI-based anatomical 3D models and gait analysis
[19]. Another reason for suggesting a hip
subluxation in patients with femoro-acetabular impingement has been reported recently by
Steppenbacher et al. The authors analyzed morphologic features of the hip
in patients after a traumatic hip dislocation and revealed an association between FAI
deformities and traumatic hip dislocation [20,
21].The findings emphasize our hypothesis that the hip vacuum sign represents a subluxation or
at least a distraction of the femoral head due to an underlying femoro-acetabular
impingement mechanism.Surprisingly, the HVS was seen in the frog-leg lateral radiographs in a conscious patient.
This is a static position in a physiological range of motion of the hip and is not the brief
result of a dynamic movement or a forced or extreme flexion or abduction. Therefore, an
acquired hip instability could be a relevant issue, as it was described by Tibor or Hammoud
[4, 22].We believe that the hip vacuum sign is an important hint in diagnostic imaging for a
relevant femoro-acetabular impingement mechanism and furthermore could be a hint for a hip
instability.In comparison with other radiographic signs associated with FAI e.g. the cross-over sign or
herniation pits, the HVS has a lower prevalence. Laborie et al. [23] found the cross-over sign in about 50% of
patients with FAI. Herniation pits were found in 85 of 200 patients in a study by Panzer
et al. [24]. These
radiographic phenomena may indicate an impingement mechanism but the reliability was
recently doubted by different authors [25,
26].There are several limitations to our study. In a retrospective study design, we included
only symptomatic patients. In addition, the patients cannot be manipulated beyond the
positioning of the original radiograph. This problem was addressed by excluding external
radiographs from the study. Furthermore the acquisition technique of the frog-leg lateral
view could be relevant. However, the HVS was also seen in external taken X-rays and is also
visible in X-rays shown in publications about femoro-acetabular impingement from other
groups [7, 27–30].The occurrence of the “Hip Vacuum Sign” was seen in symptomatic patients with femoral
acetabular impingement in the frog-leg lateral view. We suggest that it indicates a
subluxation of the femoral head that might confirm the existence of a relevant
femoro-acetabular impingement mechanism in a situation of acquired hip instability. In
patients with hip pain and a positive HVS, a high suspicion for FAI exists and a further
diagnostic evaluation of the patient is recommended.Further research is required to better characterize the underlying constitution leading to
femoral head subluxation in order to fully understand the etiology and clinical impact of
the radiological vacuum phenomenon.
Authors: Aaron J Krych; Matt Thompson; Christopher M Larson; J W Thomas Byrd; Bryan T Kelly Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 4.176