Literature DB >> 29339960

Which Differences in Priming Effect Between Neglect and Hemianopia? A Case Description of a Bilateral Brain-Lesioned Patient.

Matteo Sozzi1, Stefania Bianchi Marzoli1,2, Lisa Melzi1,2, Massimo Corbo1, Irene Venturella3,4, Michela Balconi3,4.   

Abstract

It is widely known that visuospatial neglect and hemianopia maybe superimposed. We considered the differences in implicit information processing which is effective in patients with neglect but not with hemianopia. We then hypothesize that a prime-word in the neglected field should determine a semantic activation effect but not in a blind hemifield. Moreover eye movements could provide further details. In this work we considered a patient with a bilateral with the presence of either a left visual neglect and a right homonymous hemianopia. Our results supported implicit information processing in the space affected by neglect but not by hemianopia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eye movements; hemianopia; neglect; semantic priming

Year:  2017        PMID: 29339960      PMCID: PMC5762176          DOI: 10.1080/01658107.2017.1320807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroophthalmology        ISSN: 0165-8107


  31 in total

1.  A disorder of simultaneous form perception.

Authors:  M KINSBOURNE; E K WARRINGTON
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1962-09       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 2.  Anosognosia for motor and sensory deficits after unilateral brain damage: a review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Vallar; Roberta Ronchi
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 3.  Spatial attention systems in spatial neglect.

Authors:  Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Social priming of hemispatial neglect affects spatial coding: Evidence from the Simon task.

Authors:  Isabel Arend; Daniela Aisenberg; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2016-08-17

5.  Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation.

Authors:  L Weiskrantz; E K Warrington; M D Sanders; J Marshall
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Automatic and voluntary orienting of attention in patients with visual neglect: horizontal and vertical dimensions.

Authors:  E Làdavas; M Carletti; G Gori
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Evidence for a workspace model of working memory from semantic implicit processing in neglect.

Authors:  Sergio Della Sala; Marian van der Meulen; Patricia Bestelmeyer; Robert H Logie
Journal:  J Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 2.864

8.  Exploring the syndrome of spatial unilateral neglect through an illusion of length.

Authors:  Roberta Daini; Paola Angelelli; Gabriella Antonucci; Stefano F Cappa; Giuseppe Vallar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Neglect and hemianopia superimposed.

Authors:  Eva M Müller-Oehring; Erich Kasten; Dorothe A Poggel; Tilman Schulte; Hans Strasburger; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.475

10.  Parallel interhemispheric processing in hemineglect: relation to visual field defects.

Authors:  Eva M Müller-Oehring; Tilman Schulte; Erich Kasten; Dorothe A Poggel; Iris Müller; Torsten Wüstenberg; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.