Literature DB >> 26004064

Spatial attention systems in spatial neglect.

Hans-Otto Karnath1.   

Abstract

It has been established that processes relating to 'spatial attention' are implemented at cortical level by goal-directed (top-down) and stimulus-driven (bottom-up) networks. Spatial neglect in brain-damaged individuals has been interpreted as a distinguished exemplar for a disturbance of these processes. The present paper elaborates this assumption. Functioning of the two attentional networks seem to dissociate in spatial neglect; behavioral studies of patients' orienting and exploration behavior point to a disturbed stimulus-driven but preserved goal-directed attention system. When a target suddenly appears somewhere in space, neglect patients demonstrate disturbed detection and orienting if it is located in contralesional direction. In contrast, if neglect patients explore a scene with voluntarily, top-down controlled shifts of spatial attention, they perform movements that are oriented into all spatial directions without any direction-specific disturbances. The paper thus argues that not the top-down control of spatial attention itself, rather a body-related matrix on top of which this process is executed, seems affected. In that sense, the traditional role of spatial neglect as a stroke model for 'spatial attention' requires adjustment. Beyond its insights into the human stimulus-driven attentional system, the disorder most notably provides vistas in how our brain encodes topographical information and organizes spatially oriented action - including the top-down control of spatial attention - in relation to body position.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Dorsal; Egocentric; Eye movements; Human; Reference frames; Space representation; Spatial neglect; Stroke; Top-down control; Ventral

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26004064     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  14 in total

1.  Biased temporal order judgments in chronic neglect influenced by trunk position.

Authors:  Christopher Rorden; Dongyun Li; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Using machine learning-based lesion behavior mapping to identify anatomical networks of cognitive dysfunction: Spatial neglect and attention.

Authors:  Daniel Wiesen; Christoph Sperber; Grigori Yourganov; Christopher Rorden; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex increases attention to visual target stimuli.

Authors:  Nina Vierheilig; Andreas Mühlberger; Thomas Polak; Martin J Herrmann
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Which Differences in Priming Effect Between Neglect and Hemianopia? A Case Description of a Bilateral Brain-Lesioned Patient.

Authors:  Matteo Sozzi; Stefania Bianchi Marzoli; Lisa Melzi; Massimo Corbo; Irene Venturella; Michela Balconi
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2017-05-19

5.  The Influence of Co-action on a Simple Attention Task: A Shift Back to the Status Quo.

Authors:  Jill A Dosso; Kevin H Roberts; Alessandra DiGiacomo; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-04

6.  Top-down versus bottom-up attention differentially modulate frontal-parietal connectivity.

Authors:  Jake T Bowling; Karl J Friston; Joseph B Hopfinger
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.399

7.  Eye-Tracking Provides a Sensitive Measure of Exploration Deficits After Acute Right MCA Stroke.

Authors:  Margarete Delazer; Martin Sojer; Philipp Ellmerer; Christian Boehme; Thomas Benke
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies-Methodological considerations.

Authors:  Joana Leitão; Axel Thielscher; Johannes Tuennerhoff; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Damage of the right dorsal superior longitudinal fascicle by awake surgery for glioma causes persistent visuospatial dysfunction.

Authors:  Riho Nakajima; Masashi Kinoshita; Katsuyoshi Miyashita; Hirokazu Okita; Ryoji Genda; Tetsutaro Yahata; Yutaka Hayashi; Mitsutoshi Nakada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Caloric vestibular stimulation has no effect on perceived body size.

Authors:  Hans-Otto Karnath; Isabel Kriechel; Joachim Tesch; Betty J Mohler; Simone Claire Mölbert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.