Chester Ho1,2,3, Sara J T Guilcher4,5,6, Nicole McKenzie1, Magda Mouneimne3, Anita Williams3, Jennifer Voth7, Yan Chen8, Shawna Cronin7,9, Vanessa K Noonan10, Susan B Jaglal6,7,9,11. 1. Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta. 2. Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta. 3. Alberta Health Services. 4. Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario. 5. Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario. 6. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario. 7. Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario. 8. Alberta Health. 9. Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Toronto, Ontario. 10. Rick Hansen Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia. 11. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Abstract
Background: Administrative health data, such as the hospital Discharge Abstract Database (DAD), can potentially be used to identify patients with non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction (NTSCD). Algorithms utilizing administrative health data for this purpose should be validated before clinical use. Objective: To validate an algorithm designed to identify patients with NTSCD through DAD. Method: DAD between 2006 and 2016 for Southern Alberta in Canada were obtained through Alberta Health Services. Cases of NTSCD were identified using the algorithm designed by the research team. These were then validated by chart review using electronic medical records where possible and paper records where electronic records were unavailable. Measures of diagnostic accuracy including sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed. Results: Two hundred and eighty cases were identified to have both the administrative codes for neurological impairments and NTSCD etiology. Twenty-eight cases were excluded from analysis as 5 had inadequate medical record information, 17 had traumatic spinal cord injury, and 6 were considered "other" non-spinal cord conditions. Measures of diagnostic accuracy that were computed were sensitivity 97% (95% CI, 94%-98%), specificity 60% (95% CI, 47%-73%), positive predictive value (PPV) 92% (95% CI, 88%-95%), and negative predictive value (NPV) 80% (95% CI, 65%-90%). The most prevalent etiologies were degenerative (36.9%), infection (19.0%), oncology malignant (15.1%), and vascular (10.3%). Conclusion: Our algorithm has high sensitivity and PPV and satisfactory specificity and NPV for the identification of persons with NTSCD using DAD, though the limitations for using this method should be recognized.
Background: Administrative health data, such as the hospital Discharge Abstract Database (DAD), can potentially be used to identify patients with non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction (NTSCD). Algorithms utilizing administrative health data for this purpose should be validated before clinical use. Objective: To validate an algorithm designed to identify patients with NTSCD through DAD. Method: DAD between 2006 and 2016 for Southern Alberta in Canada were obtained through Alberta Health Services. Cases of NTSCD were identified using the algorithm designed by the research team. These were then validated by chart review using electronic medical records where possible and paper records where electronic records were unavailable. Measures of diagnostic accuracy including sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed. Results: Two hundred and eighty cases were identified to have both the administrative codes for neurological impairments and NTSCD etiology. Twenty-eight cases were excluded from analysis as 5 had inadequate medical record information, 17 had traumatic spinal cord injury, and 6 were considered "other" non-spinal cord conditions. Measures of diagnostic accuracy that were computed were sensitivity 97% (95% CI, 94%-98%), specificity 60% (95% CI, 47%-73%), positive predictive value (PPV) 92% (95% CI, 88%-95%), and negative predictive value (NPV) 80% (95% CI, 65%-90%). The most prevalent etiologies were degenerative (36.9%), infection (19.0%), oncology malignant (15.1%), and vascular (10.3%). Conclusion: Our algorithm has high sensitivity and PPV and satisfactory specificity and NPV for the identification of persons with NTSCD using DAD, though the limitations for using this method should be recognized.
Entities:
Keywords:
International Classification of Diseases; database; spinal cord diseases; validation studies
Authors: F Biering-Sørensen; S Alai; K Anderson; S Charlifue; Y Chen; M DeVivo; A E Flanders; L Jones; N Kleitman; A Lans; V K Noonan; J Odenkirchen; J Steeves; K Tansey; E Widerström-Noga; L B Jakeman Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2015-02-10 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Jessica Widdifield; Sasha Bernatsky; J Michael Paterson; Karen Tu; Ryan Ng; J Carter Thorne; Janet E Pope; Claire Bombardier Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Peter Wayne New; Ronald K Reeves; Éimear Smith; Andrea Townson; Inge Eriks-Hoogland; Anupam Gupta; Belci Maurizio; Giorgio Scivoletto; Marcel W Post Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2015-03-02 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Greta Carrara; Carlo A Scirè; Antonella Zambon; Marco A Cimmino; Carlo Cerra; Marta Caprioli; Giovanni Cagnotto; Federica Nicotra; Andrea Arfè; Simona Migliazza; Giovanni Corrao; Giovanni Minisola; Carlomaurizio Montecucco Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: B Catharine Craven; S Mohammad Alavinia; Matheus J Wiest; Farnoosh Farahani; Sander L Hitzig; Heather Flett; Gaya Jeyathevan; Maryam Omidvar; Mark T Bayley Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Taylor McGuckin; Katelynn Crick; Tyler W Myroniuk; Brock Setchell; Roseanne O Yeung; Denise Campbell-Scherer Journal: BMJ Open Qual Date: 2022-01