Literature DB >> 25743728

International retrospective comparison of inpatient rehabilitation for patients with spinal cord dysfunction epidemiology and clinical outcomes.

Peter Wayne New1, Ronald K Reeves2, Éimear Smith3, Andrea Townson4, Inge Eriks-Hoogland5, Anupam Gupta6, Belci Maurizio7, Giorgio Scivoletto8, Marcel W Post9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare epidemiologic characteristics of patients with spinal cord dysfunction admitted to spinal rehabilitation units (SRUs) in 9 countries (Australia, Canada, Italy, India, Ireland, The Netherlands, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and United States).
DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter open-cohort case series.
SETTING: SRUs. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=956) with initial onset of spinal cord dysfunction consecutively admitted between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2010. Median age on admission was 59 years (interquartile range [IQR], 46-70), and 60.8% of patients were men.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic characteristics (eg, age, sex), time frame over which clinical symptoms of spinal cord dysfunction developed, etiology, length of stay in hospital, level of lesion and American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade, discharge destination, and inpatient mortality.
RESULTS: The time frame of onset of spinal cord dysfunction symptoms was as follows: ≤1 day (28.5%); ≤1 week (13.8%); >1 week but ≤1 month (10.5%), and >1 month (47.2%). Most common etiologies were degenerative conditions (30.8%), malignant tumors (16.2%), ischemia (10.9%), benign tumors (8.7%), and bacterial infections (7.1%). Most patients (72.3%) had paraplegia. The AIS grade on SRU admission was grade A in 14%, grade B in 6.5%, grade C in 24%, grade D in 52.4%, grade E in 0.2%, and missing in 2.9%. AIS grade significantly improved by discharge (z=-10.1, P<.0001). Median length of stay in the SRU was 46.5 days (IQR, 17-89.5). Most (80.5%) patients were discharged home. Differences between countries were found for most variables.
CONCLUSIONS: This international study of spinal cord dysfunction showed substantial variation of etiology, demographic, and clinical characteristics across countries. Further research, including multiple centers per country, are needed to separate country effects from center effects.
Copyright © 2015 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delivery of health care; Epidemiology; Outcome and process assessment (health care); Rehabilitation; Spinal cord diseases

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25743728     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  19 in total

1.  Progress of the Dutch Spinal Cord Injury Database: Completeness of Database and Profile of Patients Admitted for Inpatient Rehabilitation in 2015.

Authors:  Marcel W M Post; Janneke Nachtegaal; Sacha A van Langeveld; Maureen van de Graaf; Willemijn X Faber; Ellen H Roels; Coen A M van Bennekom
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2018

Review 2.  The role of specialist units to provide focused care and complication avoidance following traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Monish M Maharaj; Jarred A Hogan; Kevin Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Spinal cord injury rehabilitation in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: time to rehabilitation admission, length of stay and functional independence.

Authors:  H Mahmoud; H Qannam; D Zbogar; B Mortenson
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Retrospective study of functional outcomes and disability after non-ischaemic vascular causes of spinal cord dysfunction.

Authors:  Chiu Pin Teo; Kevin Cheng; Peter Wayne New
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Predictors of readmission to acute care during inpatient rehabilitation for non-traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  David M Robinson; Moussa S Bazzi; Scott R Millis; Ali A Bitar
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Metformin Protects Against Spinal Cord Injury by Regulating Autophagy via the mTOR Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Yue Guo; Fang Wang; Haopeng Li; Hui Liang; Yuhuan Li; Zhengchao Gao; Xijing He
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.996

7.  Development of a comprehensive survey of sexuality issues including a self-report version of the International Spinal Cord Injury sexual function basic data sets.

Authors:  P W New; K E Currie
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  Outcome after post-acute spinal cord specific rehabilitation: a German single center study.

Authors:  Matthias Ponfick
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2017-09-07

Review 9.  Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities Regarding Research in Non-traumatic Spinal Cord Dysfunction.

Authors:  Peter Wayne New; Sara J T Guilcher; Susan B Jaglal; Fin Biering-Sørensen; Vanessa K Noonan; Chester Ho
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2017

Review 10.  Review of the History of Non-traumatic Spinal Cord Dysfunction.

Authors:  Peter Wayne New; Fin Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2017
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.