Literature DB >> 29339393

Early Clinical Assessment of the Antimicrobial Activity of Finafloxacin Compared to Ciprofloxacin in Subsets of Microbiologically Characterized Isolates.

Andreas Vente1, Christine Bentley2, Mark Lückermann2, Paul Tambyah3, Axel Dalhoff4.   

Abstract

Two phase II studies were performed with patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) and complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) or acute pyelonephritis (PN) to compare finafloxacin (300 mg twice a day [b.i.d.] orally for uUTI and 800 mg once a day [q.d.] intravenously [i.v.] for cUTI/PN) and ciprofloxacin (250 mg b.i.d. orally for uUTI and 400 mg b.i.d. i.v. for cUTI/PN). The early response to the study medications was evaluated in the microbiological intent-to-treat population (mITT) at day 3. A total of 21% of the isolates were ciprofloxacin resistant, 13.7% were primed pathogens carrying a mutation(s) potentially fostering fluoroquinolone resistance development, and 7.1% produced extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs). Finafloxacin demonstrated very good early clinical activity, with microbiological eradication rates of 88.6% (n = 132), compared to 78.7% (n = 61) for ciprofloxacin, and 69.6% (n = 23), compared to 35.7% (n = 14) for ciprofloxacin, in patients with ciprofloxacin-resistant uropathogens; 94.1% (n = 17), compared to 80.0% (n = 10) for ciprofloxacin, in patients infected with uropathogens primed for fluoroquinolone resistance uropathogens; and 91.7% (n = 11), compared to 0% for ciprofloxacin, in patients infected with ESBL producers. Finafloxacin demonstrated early and rapid activity against uropathogens, including fluoroquinolone-resistant and/or multiresistant pathogens or ESBL producers, while ciprofloxacin was less active against this subset of resistant pathogens. Susceptibilities of pathogens were quantitated by broth microdilution. Isolates were subgrouped according to their susceptibility patterns, in particular first-step quinolone resistance, quinolone resistance, and ESBL production. Eradication was defined as the elimination or reduction of study entry pathogens to <103 CFU/ml in urine culture. (The studies described in this paper have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifiers NCT00722735 and NCT01928433.).
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antimicrobial agents; clinical trials; early eradication; finafloxacin; fluoroquinolone; urinary tract infection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29339393      PMCID: PMC5913966          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02325-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  33 in total

1.  Clinical and economic evaluation of subsequent infection following intravenous ciprofloxacin or imipenem therapy in hospitalized patients with severe pneumonia.

Authors:  J W Caldwell; S Singh; R H Johnson
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 2.  Alternative strategies for proof-of-principle studies of antibacterial agents.

Authors:  Axel Dalhoff; Andrej Weintraub; Carl Erik Nord
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  In vitro spectrum of activity of finafloxacin, a novel, pH-activated fluoroquinolone, under standard and acidic conditions.

Authors:  Will Stubbings; Pamela Leow; Goh Chee Yong; Falicia Goh; Barbara Körber-Irrgang; Michael Kresken; Rainer Endermann; Harald Labischinski
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Pharmacodynamics of fluoroquinolones.

Authors:  A Dalhoff
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 5.  Antimicrobial action and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics: the use of AUIC to improve efficacy and avoid resistance.

Authors:  J J Schentag
Journal:  J Chemother       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.714

6.  Activity of finafloxacin, a novel fluoroquinolone with increased activity at acid pH, towards extracellular and intracellular Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes and Legionella pneumophila.

Authors:  Sandrine Lemaire; Françoise Van Bambeke; Paul M Tulkens
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 5.283

7.  Comparison of pathogens and their antimicrobial resistance patterns in paediatric, adult and elderly patients in Canadian hospitals.

Authors:  Heather J Adam; Melanie R Baxter; Ross J Davidson; Ethan Rubinstein; Sergio Fanella; James A Karlowsky; Philippe R S Lagacé-Wiens; Daryl J Hoban; George G Zhanel
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Treatment of severe pneumonia in hospitalized patients: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial comparing intravenous ciprofloxacin with imipenem-cilastatin. The Severe Pneumonia Study Group.

Authors:  M P Fink; D R Snydman; M S Niederman; K V Leeper; R H Johnson; S O Heard; R G Wunderink; J W Caldwell; J J Schentag; G A Siami
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Impact of low-level resistance to fluoroquinolones due to qnrA1 and qnrS1 genes or a gyrA mutation on ciprofloxacin bactericidal activity in a murine model of Escherichia coli urinary tract infection.

Authors:  Nicolas Allou; Emmanuelle Cambau; Laurent Massias; Françoise Chau; Bruno Fantin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  The Association of Age and Antibiotic Resistance of Helicobacter Pylori: A Study in Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province, China.

Authors:  Zizhong Ji; Feng Han; Fei Meng; Miaoying Tu; Ningmin Yang; Jianzhong Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Considerations and Caveats in Combating ESKAPE Pathogens against Nosocomial Infections.

Authors:  Yu-Xuan Ma; Chen-Yu Wang; Yuan-Yuan Li; Jing Li; Qian-Qian Wan; Ji-Hua Chen; Franklin R Tay; Li-Na Niu
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 16.806

2.  Explorative Randomized Phase II Clinical Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Finafloxacin versus Ciprofloxacin for Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections.

Authors:  F Wagenlehner; M Nowicki; C Bentley; M Lückermann; S Wohlert; C Fischer; A Vente; K Naber; A Dalhoff
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Demonstration of the broad spectrum in vitro activity of finafloxacin against pathogens of biodefence interest.

Authors:  Kay B Barnes; Steven D Zumbrun; Stephanie A Halasohoris; Purvi D Desai; Lynda L Miller; Mark I Richards; Paul Russell; Christine Bentley; Sarah V Harding
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Selective toxicity of antibacterial agents-still a valid concept or do we miss chances and ignore risks?

Authors:  Axel Dalhoff
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 7.455

5.  Investigation of a combination therapy approach for the treatment of melioidosis.

Authors:  Kay B Barnes; Mark I Richards; Gary Burgess; Stuart J Armstrong; Christine Bentley; Thomas C Maishman; Thomas R Laws; Michelle Nelson; Sarah V Harding
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 6.  Delafloxacin, Finafloxacin, and Zabofloxacin: Novel Fluoroquinolones in the Antibiotic Pipeline.

Authors:  Béla Kocsis; Dániel Gulyás; Dóra Szabó
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.