Literature DB >> 29339374

Multicenter evaluation of a new closed system drug-transfer device in reducing surface contamination by antineoplastic hazardous drugs.

Sylvia B Bartel1, Timothy G Tyler2, Luci A Power3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Results of a study to evaluate the effectiveness of a recently introduced closed system drug-transfer device (CSTD) in reducing surface contamination during compounding and simulated administration of antineoplastic hazardous drugs (AHDs) are reported.
METHODS: Wipe samples were collected from 6 predetermined surfaces in compounding and infusion areas of 13 U.S. cancer centers to establish preexisting levels of surface contamination by 2 marker AHDs (cyclophosphamide and fluorouracil). Stainless steel templates were placed over the 6 previously sampled surfaces, and the marker drugs were compounded and infused per a specific protocol using all components of the CSTD. Wipe samples were collected from the templates after completion of tasks and analyzed for both marker AHDs.
RESULTS: Aggregated results of wipe sampling to detect preexisting contamination at the 13 study sites showed that overall, 66.7% of samples (104 of 156) had detectable levels of at least 1 marker AHD; subsequent testing after CSTD use per protocol found a sample contamination rate of 5.8% (9 of 156 samples). In the administration areas alone, the rate of preexisting contamination was 78% (61 of 78 samples); with use of the CSTD protocol, the contamination rate was 2.6%. Twenty-six participants rated the CSTD for ease of use, with 100% indicating that they were satisfied or extremely satisfied.
CONCLUSION: A study involving a rigorous protocol and 13 cancer centers across the United States demonstrated that the CSTD reduced surface contamination by cyclophosphamide and fluorouracil during compounding and simulated administration. Participants reported that the CSTD was easy to use.
Copyright © 2018 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSTD; antineoplastic drugs; closed system drug-transfer device; cyclophosphamide; hazardous drugs; surface contamination; wipe sampling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29339374     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp160948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  5 in total

1.  Evaluating Six Commercially Available Closed-System Drug-Transfer Devices Against NIOSH's 2015 Draft Vapor Protocol.

Authors:  Shiraz Halloush; Ivan A Reveles; Jim Koeller
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2019-06-06

2.  Environmental assessment of cytotoxic drugs in the Oncology Center of Cyprus.

Authors:  Elpidoforos S Soteriades; Sofia C Economidou; Artemis Tsivitanidou; Petros Polyviou; Amanda Lorimer; Nikos Katodritis; Stavroula Theophanous-Kitiri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A simple approach to assess the cancer risk of occupational exposure to genotoxic drugs in healthcare settings.

Authors:  Johannes Gerding; Lea Anhäuser; Udo Eickmann; Albert Nienhaus
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.646

4.  Prevention of coronavirus contamination from the environment using an air-cleaning closed system drug-transfer device.

Authors:  Maya Amichay; Ortal Shimon; Eitan Raveh
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2021-11-18

5.  Evaluation of Closed System Transfer Devices in Preventing Chemotherapy Agents Contamination During Compounding Process-A Single and Comparative Study in China.

Authors:  YiWen Tang; XiaoTian Che; Yao Lei Wang; Xin Ye; Wan Li Cao; Yi Wang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.