| Literature DB >> 29338801 |
Anitha Seetha1, Takuji W Tsusaka1, Timalizge W Munthali2, Maggie Musukwa2, Agnes Mwangwela2, Zione Kalumikiza2, Tinna Manani2, Lizzie Kachulu1, Nelson Kumwenda1, Mike Musoke1, Patrick Okori1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The present study examined the impacts of training on nutrition, hygiene and food safety designed by the Nutrition Working Group, Child Survival Collaborations and Resources Group (CORE).Entities:
Keywords: Complementary feeding; Malnutrition; Randomised controlled trial; Undernutrition
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29338801 PMCID: PMC5848752 DOI: 10.1017/S1368980017003652
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Public Health Nutr ISSN: 1368-9800 Impact factor: 4.022
Complementary food recipes recommended for the intervention programme to mitigate child undernutrition in rural Malawi
| Recipe 1 | Recipe 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crop | Food group | Quantity | Crop | Food group | Quantity |
| Maize | Cereal | 60 g | Maize | Cereal | 25 g |
| Groundnut | Legume | 30 g | Finger millet | Cereal | 25 g |
| Carrot | Vitamin A-rich vegetable | ½ cup | Groundnut | Legume | 25 g |
| Amaranth | Green leafy vegetable | 1 cup | Pigeon pea | Legume | 15 g |
| Amaranth | Green leafy vegetable | 1 cup | |||
| Carrot | Vitamin A-rich vegetable | ½ cup | |||
Baseline agricultural practices of the studied households in Mchiniji, Mzimba and Balaka districts, rural Malawi, 2014–2015
| Variable/category | No. of households/ total | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|---|
| No. of farmers who participated | 166/240 | 69 |
| Grading | ||
| Groundnuts graded | 73/166 | 44 |
| Maize graded | 38/166 | 23 |
| Grading criteria | ||
| Based on rottenness | 9/73 | 12 |
| Based on size and shape | 64/73 | 88 |
| Fate of grade-outs | ||
| Consume in roasted form (mainly groundnuts) | 30 | 42 |
| Consume in the form of peanut butter | 24 | 34 |
| Consume by making into powder (maize
to prepare | 24 | 64 |
| Discard (groundnut) | 9 | 13 |
| Discard (maize) | 5 | 13 |
| Feed to livestock | ||
| Groundnut | 8 | 11 |
| Maize | 9 | 23 |
Baseline indicators of dietary habits of infants and young children in the sampled households in Mchiniji, Mzimba and Balaka districts, rural Malawi, 2014–2015
| Indicator | Value | Age (months) |
|---|---|---|
| Exclusively breast-fed (%) | 97 | <6 months |
| Dietary diversity score (max. 7·0) | 6–23 months | |
| Mean | 2·0 | |
|
| 1·0 | |
| Met minimum dietary diversity (%) | 7 | 6–23 months |
| Meal frequency (times/d) | 6–23 months | |
| Mean | 2·0 | |
|
| 0·8 | |
| Met minimum meal frequency (%) | 50 | 6–23 months |
| Met minimum acceptable diet (%) | 7 | 6–23 months |
Baseline aflatoxin concentration in maize and urine of the sampled children (n 241) from households in Mchiniji, Mzimba and Balaka districts, rural Malawi, 2014–2015
| Variable | Mean |
| Min. | Max. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urine aflatoxin concentration (pg/ml) | 45 | 89 | 0 | 783 |
| Urine aflatoxin dummy (1 if above 1 pg/ml) | 0·5 | 0·5 | 0 | 1 |
| Maize aflatoxin concentration (ppb) | 1·4 | 3·4 | 0 | 20·9 |
| Maize aflatoxin dummy (1 if above 1 ppb) | 0·25 | 0·4 | 0 | 1 |
Mean difference in baseline aflatoxin concentration in urine (pg/ml) by maize contamination status in the sampled children (n 241) from households in Mchiniji, Mzimba and Balaka districts, rural Malawi, 2014–2015
| Aflatoxin in food |
| Mean |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <1 ppb | 180 | 44·8 | 75·8 | ||
| >1 ppb | 61 | 46·7 | 120·6 | ||
| Difference | −2·0 | −0·15 | 0·560 |
Mean difference in baseline undernutrition indicators by urine aflatoxin status in the sampled children (n 241) from households in Mchiniji, Mzimba and Balaka districts, rural Malawi, 2014–2015
| Malnutrition indicator | Aflatoxin in urine |
| Mean |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight-for-height | 0 pg/ml | 118 | 0·92 | 1·56 | ||
|
| >0 pg/ml | 123 | 0·64 | 1·67 | ||
| Difference | 0·28 | 1·35 | 0·090 | |||
| Height-for-age | 0 pg/ml | 118 | −0·78 | 1·90 | ||
|
| >0 pg/ml | 123 | −0·60 | 1·80 | ||
| Difference | −0·18 | −0·77 | 0·779 | |||
| Weight-for-age | 0 pg/ml | 118 | 0·16 | 1·38 | ||
|
| >0 pg/ml | 123 | 0·07 | 1·37 | ||
| (underweight) | Difference | 0·09 | 0·50 | 0·308 |
Baseline undernutrition status of the children (n 241) from households in Mchiniji, Mzimba and Balaka districts, rural Malawi, 2014–2015
| Anthropometric variable | Mean |
| Min. | Max. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (kg) | 8·6 | 1·5 | 4·5 | 13·5 |
| Height (cm) | 69 | 5·4 | 56 | 84 |
| Mid-upper arm circumference (cm) | 14 | 1·2 | 10 | 17 |
| Weight-for-height
| 0·8 | 1·6 | −4·6 | 6·2 |
| Severe wasting dummy (1 if
| 0·1 | 0·2 | 0 | 1 |
| Height-for-age
| −0·7 | 1·8 | −6·9 | 5·0 |
| Severe stunting dummy (1 if
| 0·2 | 0·4 | 0 | 1 |
| Weight-for-age
| 0·1 | 1·3 | −5·0 | 3·3 |
| Severe underweight dummy (1 if
| 0·1 | 0·3 | 0 | 1 |
Impacts of the training to mitigate child undernutrition on wasting, stunting, underweight and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) of children from households in Mzimba and Balaka districts, rural Malawi, 2014–2015: difference-in-difference estimations (DID; n 179)
| Weight-for-height
| Height-for-age
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed effect | Random effect | OLS robust | Fixed effect | Random effect | OLS robust | |||||||
| Dependent variable | Estimate |
| Estimate |
| Estimate |
| Estimate |
| Estimate |
| Estimate |
|
| Treatment dummy | NA | −0·70 | 0·085 | −0·63 | 0·099 | NA | 0·59 | 0·093 | 0·67** | 0·027 | ||
| Day 7 dummy | 0·01 | 0·952 | 0·01 | 0·952 | 0·19 | 0·411 | −0·02 | 0·907 | −0·02 | 0·907 | 0·14 | 0·487 |
| Day 14 dummy | −0·16 | 0·445 | −0·16 | 0·444 | −0·13 | 0·610 | 0·05 | 0·714 | 0·05 | 0·714 | 0·18 | 0·368 |
| Day 21 Dummy | −0·25 | 0·240 | −0·25 | 0·238 | −0·20 | 0·446 | −0·04 | 0·763 | −0·04 | 0·763 | 0·09 | 0·680 |
| DID (day 7) | 0·37 | 0·163 | 0·37 | 0·161 | 0·21 | 0·486 | 0·03 | 0·843 | 0·03 | 0·843 | −0·14 | 0·521 |
| DID (day 14) | 0·71*** | 0·007 | 0·71*** | 0·006 | 0·72** | 0·025 | 0·003 | 0·987 | 0·003 | 0·987 | −0·14 | 0·561 |
| DID (day 21) | 0·85*** | 0·001 | 0·85*** | 0·001 | 0·84** | 0·014 | 0·18 | 0·281 | 0·18 | 0·279 | 0·01 | 0·956 |
| Constant | 0·40*** | 0·000 | 0·87*** | 0·000 | 0·27 | 0·801 | 0·66*** | 0·000 | 0·26 | 0·363 | −0·15 | 0·806 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Wald test |
|
| ||||||||||
| Weight-for-age
| MUAC (cm) | |||||||||||
| Fixed effect | Random effect | OLS robust | Fixed effect | Random effect | OLS robust | |||||||
| Dependent variable | Estimate |
| Estimate |
| Estimate |
| Estimate |
| Estimate |
| Estimate |
|
| Treatment dummy | NA | −0·25 | 0·365 | −0·14 | 0·627 | NA | 0·33 | 0·609 | 0·36 | 0·189 | ||
| Day 7 dummy | −0·03 | 0·853 | −0·03 | 0·853 | 0·22 | 0·338 | 0·18 | 0·792 | 0·15 | 0·824 | 0·20 | 0·292 |
| Day 14 dummy | −0·11 | 0·452 | −0·11 | 0·451 | 0·01 | 0·971 | 0·12 | 0·860 | 0·12 | 0·859 | 0·25 | 0·343 |
| Day 21 Dummy | −0·23 | 0·104 | −0·23 | 0·102 | −0·09 | 0·627 | −1·62** | 0·017 | −1·62 | 0·016 | −1·55 | 0·337 |
| DID (day 7) | 0·31* | 0·065 | 0·31* | 0·063 | 0·08 | 0·757 | −0·17 | 0·833 | −0·15 | 0·861 | −0·21 | 0·413 |
| DID (day 14) | 0·53*** | 0·002 | 0·53*** | 0·002 | 0·44* | 0·076 | −0·02 | 0·979 | −0·02 | 0·979 | 0·03 | 0·923 |
| DID (day 21) | 0·74*** | 0·000 | 0·73*** | 0·000 | 0·61** | 0·013 | 1·92** | 0·020 | 1·92** | 0·019 | 1·94 | 0·253 |
| Constant | 0·62*** | 0·000 | 0·79*** | 0·001 | 0·31 | 0·638 | 0·12 | 0·655 | −0·98 | 0·852 | 2·40 | 0·204 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Wald test |
|
| ||||||||||
NA, not applicable.
Control variables in the ordinary least squares (OLS) and random-effect regression models are not shown, which are mother’s age, household head’s sex, household head’s age, household head’s education, household size and asset holding.
*P<0·10, **P<0·05, ***P<0·01.