| Literature DB >> 29338738 |
Jacqui Brener1, Astrid Gall2, Jacob Hurst3, Rebecca Batorsky4, Nora Lavandier5, Fabian Chen6, Anne Edwards7, Chrissy Bolton5, Reena Dsouza5, Todd Allen4, Oliver G Pybus8, Paul Kellam9,10, Philippa C Matthews3, Philip J R Goulder5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The factors determining differential HIV disease outcome among individuals expressing protective HLA alleles such as HLA-B*27:05 and HLA-B*57:01 remain unknown. We here analyse two HIV-infected subjects expressing both HLA-B*27:05 and HLA-B*57:01. One subject maintained low-to-undetectable viral loads for more than a decade of follow up. The other progressed to AIDS in < 3 years.Entities:
Keywords: CTL response; HIV-1; HLA; Superinfection; Transmission pair; Ultra-deep sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29338738 PMCID: PMC5771019 DOI: 10.1186/s12977-018-0390-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Retrovirology ISSN: 1742-4690 Impact factor: 4.602
Fig. 4Viral replicative capacity (VRC) of recombinant viruses produced from autologous gag-pro from HLA-B*27:05/B*57:01-positive subjects. VRC of gag-pro chimeric virus derived from a longitudinal sampling of progressor R097 and his transmission partner R096; and b controller RI088. VRC is given by the percentage of infected (GFP-expressing) target cells
Fig. 1Plasma HIV RNA viral load and CD4+ T cell counts for HLA-B*27:05/57:01+ subject R097 and his transmission partner R096 and phylogenetic analysis of HIV sequences showing epidemiological linkage and sequence diversity in transmission pair R096/R097. a Transmission pair donor, R096. b Transmission pair recipient, R097. ‘Early’ and ‘late’ time points of sampling for sequencing are shown (see c). ‘Time 0’ represents the time of diagnosis of recipient R097. The horizontal dotted line represents the limit of detection (LOD) of the viral load assay (40 HIV RNA copies/ml). Grey shading indicates the period during which the subject received antiretroviral (ART) therapy. c Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of 1091 bp alignment of RNA (ultra-deep consensus) sequences across the Gag p17 and p24 genes. The donor R096 sequence is shown in blue. Early and late sequencing time points are shown in a. The early R097 sequences are shown in red (n = 2). The late (post-2 year) sequences for R097 are shown in green (n = 11). The early and late sequences form two distinct clusters indicating considerable intra-host sequence diversification over time. 143 B clade reference sequences from the US and UK collected between 2003 and 2011 from the Los Alamos database (http://www.hiv.lanl.gov/) are shown in black. Bootstrap values for the R097 sequence clusters based on 1000 bootstrap replicates are shown in italics
HLA-B*51:01 and HLA-B*13:02 footprints in the recipient R097 sequence
For each epitope the B clade consensus sequence is represented as the top line. The R096 (donor) sequence is represented on the middle line, and the R097 (recipient) sequence at time 0 on the bottom line. Polymorphisms that represent previously described HLA-associated footprints [22] underlined. Sequences where an HLA-associated footprint does not fall within a described epitope are shaded in grey
Donor R096 and recipient R097 viral sequences encoding HLA-B*27:05/B*57:01-restricted epitopes
Epitopes showing evidence of CTL driven evolution in R097 are highlighted in grey
Ultra-deep RNA sequencing of HLA-B*57:01 and HLA-B*27:05-restricted epitopes and associated compensatory positions from R097 and his transmission partner R096
Depth of coverage ranges from 46 to 85,000 reads. Epitopes at which predictable footprints [22] are selected in the donor are shown. The early selection of escape and compensatory mutations in the minor variant populations are shown in bold italics
Fig. 2Clinical course of infection and phylogenetic analysis of viral sequences from HLA-B*27:05/57:01-positive controller RI088. a Plasma HIV viral load and CD4+ T cell count for HLA-B*27:05/B*57:01-positive recipient RI088. ‘Time 0’ represents the time of diagnosis. The horizontal dotted line represents the limit of detection (LOD) of the viral load assay (40 copies/ml). b Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of a 1089 bp alignment of the Gag gene sequenced from proviral DNA (consensus of clonal sequences shown in Table 4). Subject RI088 (n = 6) sequences spanning 10 years are shown in red. 180 B clade reference sequences from the US and UK collected between 2003 and 2011 from the Los Alamos database (http://www.hiv.lanl.gov/) are shown in black. Bootstrap values for the RI088 sequence cluster based on 1000 bootstrap replicates are shown in italics
Clonal Sequencing of HIV proviral DNA at HLA‐B*57:01 and HLA-B*27:05-restricted Gag epitopes from controller RI088
The number of clones sequenced at each timepoint and number of independent PCR reactions from which PCR product was cloned are given. The percentage of clones with each sequence haplotype is shown. The most prevalent (consensus) epitope sequence is shown in black. Lower frequency variant sequences are shown in grey.
Fig. 3HIV-specific CTL responses in progressor R097 and in non-progressor RI088. EliSpot assays tested recognition of overlapping 18mer peptides, which together spanned the B clade proteome. The figure includes the full sequence of each 18mer peptide recognised and the HLA restriction where known, with known optimal epitopes shown in bold. a EliSpot responses detected in progressor R097 at time 0 (diagnosis) and 2.0 years later. Data shown at 2.0 years are the median of 3 assays undertaken at 1.96, 1.98 and 2.15 years after time 0. No responses were detected to the 18mer peptides containing the epitopes ISPRTLNAW or STTVKAACWW at either timepoint. b Responses detected in non-progressor RI088 at the times shown post diagnosis. Selected peptides that were strongly recognized in R097 but not in RI088 are included in panel B