We lack the understanding of why HIV-infected individuals in South Africa progress to AIDS. We hypothesised that in end-stage disease there is a shifting dynamic between T cell imposed immunity and viral immune escape, which, through both compensatory and reverting viral mutations, results in increased viral fitness, elevated plasma viral loads and disease progression. We explored how T cell responses, viral adaptation and viral fitness inter-relate in South African cohorts recruited from Bloemfontein, the Free State (n = 278) and Durban, KwaZulu-Natal (n = 775). Immune responses were measured by γ-interferon ELISPOT assays. HLA-associated viral polymorphisms were determined using phylogenetically corrected techniques, and viral replication capacity (VRC) was measured by comparing the growth rate of gag-protease recombinant viruses against recombinant NL4-3 viruses. We report that in advanced disease (CD4 counts <100 cells/µl), T cell responses narrow, with a relative decline in Gag-directed responses (p<0.0001). This is associated with preserved selection pressure at specific viral amino acids (e.g., the T242N polymorphism within the HLA-B*57/5801 restricted TW10 epitope), but with reversion at other sites (e.g., the T186S polymorphism within the HLA-B*8101 restricted TL9 epitope), most notably in Gag and suggestive of "immune relaxation". The median VRC from patients with CD4 counts <100 cells/µl was higher than from patients with CD4 counts ≥ 500 cells/µl (91.15% versus 85.19%, p = 0.0004), potentially explaining the rise in viral load associated with disease progression. Mutations at HIV Gag T186S and T242N reduced VRC, however, in advanced disease only the T242N mutants demonstrated increasing VRC, and were associated with compensatory mutations (p = 0.013). These data provide novel insights into the mechanisms of HIV disease progression in South Africa. Restoration of fitness correlates with loss of viral control in late disease, with evidence for both preserved and relaxed selection pressure across the HIV genome. Interventions that maintain viral fitness costs could potentially slow progression.
We lack the understanding of why HIV-infected individuals in South Africa progress to AIDS. We hypothesised that in end-stage disease there is a shifting dynamic between T cell imposed immunity and viral immune escape, which, through both compensatory and reverting viral mutations, results in increased viral fitness, elevated plasma viral loads and disease progression. We explored how T cell responses, viral adaptation and viral fitness inter-relate in South African cohorts recruited from Bloemfontein, the Free State (n = 278) and Durban, KwaZulu-Natal (n = 775). Immune responses were measured by γ-interferon ELISPOT assays. HLA-associated viral polymorphisms were determined using phylogenetically corrected techniques, and viral replication capacity (VRC) was measured by comparing the growth rate of gag-protease recombinant viruses against recombinant NL4-3 viruses. We report that in advanced disease (CD4 counts <100 cells/µl), T cell responses narrow, with a relative decline in Gag-directed responses (p<0.0001). This is associated with preserved selection pressure at specific viral amino acids (e.g., the T242N polymorphism within the HLA-B*57/5801 restricted TW10 epitope), but with reversion at other sites (e.g., the T186S polymorphism within the HLA-B*8101 restricted TL9 epitope), most notably in Gag and suggestive of "immune relaxation". The median VRC from patients with CD4 counts <100 cells/µl was higher than from patients with CD4 counts ≥ 500 cells/µl (91.15% versus 85.19%, p = 0.0004), potentially explaining the rise in viral load associated with disease progression. Mutations at HIV Gag T186S and T242N reduced VRC, however, in advanced disease only the T242N mutants demonstrated increasing VRC, and were associated with compensatory mutations (p = 0.013). These data provide novel insights into the mechanisms of HIV disease progression in South Africa. Restoration of fitness correlates with loss of viral control in late disease, with evidence for both preserved and relaxed selection pressure across the HIV genome. Interventions that maintain viral fitness costs could potentially slow progression.
With few exceptions, untreated individuals infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Type 1 (HIV-1) develop Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), associated with
opportunistic infections, malignancies and, eventually, death. Some patients
progress to AIDS quickly, whilst others maintain undetectable plasma viral loads
without therapy and do not become unwell for many years. Deciphering the correlates
of this heterogeneous protection is important, as there are implications for the
design of vaccines and other interventions.The pace of HIV disease progression is multifactorial - a mixture of host and
pathogen genetics combined with factors such as the immune response and viral
adaptation. In genome-wide association studies a limited number of SNPs and alleles
correlate with lower viral loads [1]
[2], and HLA Class I and the human MHC associate reproducibly
[3]. The role
of the cell-mediated immune system in HIV-associated disease has received much
scrutiny, especially the effect of different HLA Class I alleles. Well-documented
examples include the protection conferred by HLA B*57 and B*27 [4]
[5] in Caucasian
individuals and HLA B*5801 and B*8101 in patients from South Africa [6].What determines this differential HLA Class I effect is unclear.
‘Beneficial’ HLA Class I alleles may be associated with T cell clones
with broader cross-reactivity to viral variants due to reduced thymic selection
[7], and thus
broader and more pervasive selection pressure. However, HIV is adept at adapting to
selection pressures invoked by both antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) and the immune
system in the forms of drug resistance [8]
[9] and immune escape mutations
[10]
[11], respectively.
The latter are widespread across the HIV-1 genome [12]
[13]
[14], and may influence
outcome in individual patients [15] and across different populations [16].Escape from an effective immune response is determined by the strength of the imposed
selection pressure and may explain why the prevalence of HLA-associated
polymorphisms is greater for HLA Class I alleles associated with protection [17]. Although the
adapted virus maintains a fitness advantage in the presence of the selection
pressure conferred by cytotoxic T cells (CTL), there may be a significant drop in
replicative capacity compared to a wild-type virus in a selection-free environment
[18]
[19]. We, and others, have previously hypothesised that immune
escape may therefore result in the maintenance of relatively lower viral loads and
clinical advantage [17]
[20], [21]. This is
supported by high reversion rates of escape mutations selected by
‘beneficial’ HLA Class I alleles following transmission to
HLA-mismatched recipients [22]
[23].These interactions between HLA Class I imposed selection, viral escape and viral
fitness are together likely to influence clinical progression, however the
mechanisms that lead to progression to late disease and AIDS are poorly defined. We
hypothesised that the nature of these interactions can be understood better by
investigating patients with late-stage HIV infection to determine if, or how,
CD8+ve T cells are maintaining selection pressure, and whether the virus shows
different patterns of adaptation and fitness costs compared to patients with earlier
infection. There are limited reports that, despite the loss of CD4+ve cells,
CD8+ve T cells may still be functional in AIDS, although with varied avidity,
less polyfunctionality and less differentiation [24], and targeting Env rather than
Gag [25]. We
proposed that if CD8 T cell pressure is ‘relaxed’ due to HIV-induced
immunodeficiency this might facilitate reversion of costly escape mutations, leading
to a restoration of viral fitness and the subsequent rise in viraemia seen in AIDS.
Reversion of costly drug resistance mutations has been associated with a rise in
viral load and clinical progression [26], and therefore a precedent exists to potentially explain
the rise in viral load associated with the onset of AIDS. Alternatively, CTL
pressure may be maintained, but the virus might develop secondary compensatory
mutations, which restore the replicative cost of the initial escape mutation.
Compensatory mutations have been reported in chronic infection [27], [28], but whether they explain the
AIDS-associated rise in viraemia is not known.In this study we question whether progression to AIDS is associated with an increase
in viral fitness, and whether this is related to changes in T cell imposed selection
pressure. We start by comparing T cell ELISPOT responses in patients across
different CD4 count strata, and then examine how the variation in these responses
correlates with different patterns of selection across the HIV genome in patients
with very low CD4 cell counts compared with less progressed infections. Finally, we
measure the viral fitness of these variants to correlate the replicative cost of
adaptation with outcome. We investigated 1053 untreated HIV-1 infected South African
individuals from Bloemfontein and Durban, and found that viral fitness was greater
in patients with advanced disease with examples of both viral compensatory mutations
and of reduction in escape mutations, the latter possibly due to ‘immune
relaxation’. Despite the complex interplay between host and pathogen, these
data support a key role for the restoration of viral fitness in association with
AIDS progression and help to explain the rise in viraemia in terminal stages.
Methods
Ethics Statement
Full ethical approval was gained for the study of both cohorts. Written informed
consent was provided by all study participants. The study ethics for the
Bloemfontein cohort was approved by the University of the Free State (ETOVS
10/04 and ETOVS 206/05) and for the Durban cohort by the University of
KwaZulu-Natal Review Board.
Study subjects
Participants from two South African cohorts were studied (total
n = 1053) - the ‘Bloemfontein’ cohort from the
Free State (n = 278) and the ‘Durban’ cohort
from KwaZulu-Natal (n = 775). Both are established cohorts,
described elsewhere ([29]
[6]). In
summary, each of the cohorts was comprised of antiretroviral naïve and
chronically HIV-1 subtype C-infected adults from neighbouring provinces in the
central east region of South Africa. Of these, 916 patients with data on CD4
cell count, HLA class I type and either HIV gag,
pol or nef sequences were included in the
analysis of HLA-linked polymorphisms, and comprised the ‘total’
cohort. Subsequent analyses involved stratification of the patients according to
HLA type, plasma viral load and CD4 T cell count. In the CD4 T cell count
stratification, patients were assigned to either “High CD4” (CD4 T
cell counts >500 cells/µl, n = 299), or “Low
CD4” (CD4 T cell counts <100 cells/µl,
n = 196).
HLA typing
Participants' HLA Class I type was determined to the oligo-allelic level
using Dynal RELITM Reverse Sequence-Specific Oligonucleotide kits for the HLA-A,
-B and –C loci (Dynal Biotech). To obtain four-digit typing, Dynal Biotech
Sequence-Specific priming kits were used, in conjunction with the
Sequence-Specific Oligonucleotide type.
T Cell ELISPOT assays
Peptides, 18 amino acids in length (n = 410), overlapping by
10 amino acids, and spanning the entire expressed HIV genome, were synthesized
based on the consensus of available C-clade sequences in 2001. These peptides
were used in a ‘mega-matrix’ of 11–12 peptides per pool to
test patient samples for HIV-specific T cell responses by interferon-gamma
ELISPOT assay, as previously described [30]. Confirmation of recognised
individual 18-mer peptides within a peptide pool was carried out in separate
ELISPOT assays.
Sequencing of HIV gag, pol and
nef
HIV gag, pol and nef were
sequenced using previously described methods and primers [17]. In brief, viral RNA was
extracted from plasma, reverse transcribed to cDNA and amplified using a nested
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol. Population sequencing of the HIV pol
gene was carried out using ABI Big Dye terminator sequencing kits (Applied
Biosystems), according to manufacturer's instructions. Sequences were
aligned manually using X11 and Se-Al software.
Identification of HLA class I linked polymorphisms
Amino acid polymorphisms that associated with host HLA class I alleles, were
identified using previously described methods utilising ‘phylogenetic
dependency networks’ [31]. Briefly, the analysis combines phylogenetic
correction with a statistical model of evolution to evaluate associations
between host HLA class I alleles and viral amino acid site-specific
polymorphisms. The analysis adjusts for confounding factors including founder
effects, linkage disequilibrium of host HLA types, co-variation in HIV codons
and corrections for multiple statistical tests. The significance of an
association is expressed as a ‘q value’, which estimates the false
discovery rate for each p-value. In this study an association is considered
significant for q<0.2. ‘Escape’ describes increased polymorphisms
observed at a particular amino acid site in the presence of a specific HLA class
I allele. ‘Reversion’ describes decreased polymorphisms observed at
a particular amino acid site in the absence of a specific HLA class I allele.
The strength of associations between HLA class I alleles and viral polymorphisms
in the “total” cohort, “high CD4” group or “low
CD4” group was derived using a logistic regression model that corrected
for phylogeny, and is reported as a log2-adjusted odds ratio.Identified polymorphisms were mapped to known cytotoxic T cell epitopes. Epitope
maps were defined from experimental data from the Durban cohort [6], and from
those listed in the A-list of Los Alamos Database (http://www.hiv.lanl.gov/content/immunology/pdf/2008/optimal_ctl_article.pdf).
The epitope flanking region was also included in the analysis, defined according
to the five amino acids neighbouring to the defined epitope in both C and N
terminal directions.
Generation of chimeric NL4-3 viruses
Chimeric viruses were constructed by recombining a
gag-protease-deleted pNL4-3 HIV plasmid
(pNL4-3Δgag-protease) with autologous
gag-protease amplified from virus extracted from patient
plasma, as described elsewhere [19], [32], [33], [34].In brief, to amplify the autologous HIV gag-protease viral RNA
was extracted from plasma, reverse transcribed and amplified using specific
primers in the first round of nested PCR using the Superscript III One-step
RT-PCR kit with high fidelity Platinum Taq polymerase
(Invitrogen) (forward primer: 5′
AAATCTCTAGCAGTGGCGCCCGAACAG 3′, HXB2 nucleotides 623
to 649; reverse primer: 5′
TTTAACCCTGCTGGGTGTGGTATYCCT 3′, HXB2 nucleotides 2851
to 2825). The second round of the nested PCR was conducted using a 100-mer
primer pair (forward primer: 5′
GACTCGGCTTGCTGAAGCGCGCACGGCAAGAGGCGAGGGGCGGCGACTGGTGAGTACGCCAAAAATTTTGACTAGCGGAGGCTAGAAGGAGAGAGATGGG
3′, HXB2 nucleotides 695 to 794; reverse primer:
5′
GGCCCAATTTTTGAAATTTTTCCTTCCTTTTCCATTTCTGTACAAATTTCTACTAATGCTTTTATTTTTTCTTCTGTCAATGGCCATTGTTTAACTTTTG
3′, HXB2 nucleotides 2704 to 2605) that completely
matched the pNL4-3 sequences using Platinum Taq polymerase
(Invitrogen).The pNL4-3 HIV plasmid had been mutated to contain unique restriction enzyme
(BstEII) sites at the 5′ end of the
gag gene and 45 nucleotides downstream from the 3′
end of the protease gene, as described elsewhere [19]. The
BstEII enzyme digest results in deletion of HIV
gag-protease and self ligation of the remaining plasmid
(pNL4-3Δgag-protease). For transfection, the
pNL4-3Δgag-protease was linearised by
BstEII digestion for two hours at 60°C (10 U/µl
of enzyme per 1000 µg/mL of plasmid). For each sample, 10 µg of the
linearised pNL4-3Δgag-protease was co-transfected with 5
µg of patient-derived gag-protease PCR product in
3.9×106 tat-driven GFP reporter T cells (GXR cells of CEM
origin). After transfection by electroporation (250 V, 950 µF, for
30–40 msec), 10 µl polybrene (4 µg/µl) and
1×106 GXR cells were added and incubated at 37°C.
Positive control samples were generated using co-transfection of
pNL4-3Δgag-protease with gag-protease
amplified from pNL4-3, pHXB2 (subtype B), and pMJ4 (subtype C). After five days,
GFP expression was measured every 1∼2 days using a FACSCalibur flow
cytometer (FACSCalibur; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Supernatant was harvested
when >15% of cells were positive for GFP, and stored at
−80°C.
Measurement of viral replication capacity (VRC)
Viral titration was performed in 1×106 GXR cells to determine
the multiplicity of infection (MOI). The VRC was assayed by adding recombinant
virus supernatant to 1×106 GXR cells at an MOI of 0.003. The
VRC was measured, at least in duplicate, using gating strategies as previously
described [19].
The growth of virus was calculated from the slope derived from the natural log
of the percentage of GFP positive cells between days 2 and day 7, as appropriate
for an exponential growth curve. The final VRC of each variant is expressed as
percentage growth rate of the variants compared to that of recombinant NL4-3
strains. In addition, for each VRC assay, viral supernatants were collected on
day 7 for viral RNA extraction and sequencing to confirm the population
sequences VRC measured.
Statistics
Student t-tests (two tailed) and Mann-Whitney tests (two tailed) were used to
compare various clinical parameters and VRC measurements. The statistical
analyses were carried out using Prism4 for Macintosh (GraphPad Software, version
4.0c). Associations between HLA Class I alleles and viral polymorphisms were
determined using phylogenetically-corrected algorithms, as described above.
Results
Structure of cohorts
Patients were recruited from the Bloemfontein and Durban cohorts [29]
[6]. The
Bloemfontein cohort comprises 884 drug-naïve patients at all stages of HIV
infection recruited through the South African government ARV program. Plasma
samples were studied from 278 out of the 884 participants: 96 out of 110
patients in the high (CD4 count>500 cells/µl), 18 out of 308 in an
intermediate (CD4 count = 201–400 cells/µl),
and 164 of 183 in the low (CD4 count<100 cells/µl) strata. The samples
were used for the HLA-association study and to make recombinant viral strains
for the analysis of fitness. To increase the power of the HLA-association
analysis we incorporated HIV viral sequences from the neighbouring Durban
cohort, which comprised 775 adults, naive to antiretroviral therapy. Of these,
219 were asymptomatic women identified through antenatal clinics. The remaining
556 subjects were recruited from out-patient clinics. For all 775 patients host
HLA class I alleles were genotyped. ELISPOT assays were carried out using
overlapping peptides designed from the subtype C majority consensus. For 656 of
these patients, sequences of either viral gag,
pol and nef genes were available.
Breadth of ELISPOT responses narrows in advanced disease
In order to measure the T cell-imposed selection pressure acting on HIV at
different stages of the infection, ELISPOT assays using overlapping peptides
(OLPs) covering the entire HIV genome were analysed from 775 patients. Results
were stratified according to CD4 cell count and are presented according to the
number of OLPs seen per patient for each gene (Figure 1a), and the percentage contribution
of each protein to all responses in each strata (Figure 1b). The figure shows that over the
course of infection, there is a general narrowing of the absolute breadth of
responses (Figure 1a).
However, the relative contribution of Gag to the total responses decreased
(p<0.0001, r2 = 0.055) in contrast to the
proportion of responses to other proteins such as Env (p<0.0001,
r2 = 0.024) and Vif
(p = 0.003, r2 = 0.011),
which was greater in patients with lower CD4 cell counts. We hypothesized that
the reduction in breadth of CD8+ve T cell responses might result in, and
therefore correlate with, a decline in selection pressure, particularly in Gag
in light of the relative shift away from Gag targeting. As a result, this
‘immune relaxation’ might allow the reversion of costly viral escape
mutations back to a fitter wild type state. Accordingly, we next analysed HLA
Class I-associated polymorphisms in the HIV-1 gag,
pol and nef genes to identify any
difference in the strength of selection pressure in patients with high and low
CD4 cell counts.
Figure 1
Gamma interferon ELISPOT responses in patients with CD4 counts above
and below 100 cells/µl.
Recognition of overlapping peptides covering the full HIV genome is shown
in patients with CD4 cell counts above and below 100 cells/µl.
ELISPOT responses are displayed as (a.) the absolute breadth of
responses, reflecting the mean number of overlapping peptides recognised
by each patient for each HIV protein and, (b.) the relative breadth,
reflecting the proportion of ELISPOT responses targeted against
different HIV proteins in patients within different CD4 count
strata.
Gamma interferon ELISPOT responses in patients with CD4 counts above
and below 100 cells/µl.
Recognition of overlapping peptides covering the full HIV genome is shown
in patients with CD4 cell counts above and below 100 cells/µl.
ELISPOT responses are displayed as (a.) the absolute breadth of
responses, reflecting the mean number of overlapping peptides recognised
by each patient for each HIV protein and, (b.) the relative breadth,
reflecting the proportion of ELISPOT responses targeted against
different HIV proteins in patients within different CD4 count
strata.
Identification of HLA class I linked polymorphisms in HIV-1 gag, pol
and nef
To identify evidence of differential HLA Class I imposed selection pressure in
patients with high and low CD4 cell counts, we carried out a study to identify
HLA Class I associations with particular amino acid polymorphisms in this
cohort. We accounted for potential confounding effects such as phylogeny,
founder effect and multiple comparisons by using phylogenetic dependency
networks [31]
- an approach which reports associations between specific viral polymorphisms
and HLA Class I alleles according to p value, q value (a measure of false
positive error) and a phylogenetically-adjusted odds ratio.Initially, we analysed 916 HIV-1 gag, pol and
nef sequences from the combined Durban and Bloemfontein
cohorts and then we carried out sub-group analyses on patients with either
‘high’ (>500 cells/µl, n = 299) or
‘low’ (<100 cells/µl, n = 196) CD4
cell counts. We then selected those HIV amino acid polymorphisms significantly
associated with an HLA Class I allele in either, or both of, the
‘high’ or ‘low’ CD4 count group of patients for further
analysis. The results for gag, pol and
nef are presented in Tables 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The tables detail each viral
polymorphism and its associated HLA Class I allele, whether the association lies
in, or within, the flanking region of a known restricted epitope and whether
this association is expected to revert in HLA-mismatched hosts [35]. The q
values for the statistically significant associations for the whole cohort, the
‘high’ CD4 count subgroup (>500 cells/µl) and
‘low’ CD4 count subgroup (<100 cells/µl) are shown,
followed by the log2-adjusted odds ratios for the ‘high’
and ‘low’ groups. In the final column, the p value is reported, when
there is a significant difference between the two odds ratios.
Table 1
HLA-related associated polymorphisms in the HIV Gag protein in
different CD4 count strata.
q-value of HLA-related association in
each strata
Phylogentically corrected Log2 Odds
Ratio (pLOR) towards “escape”
HIV-1 protein
HLA Class I
Population majority consensus amino acid at
associated site
HXB2 site and direction of HLA associated
polymorphism
Is the amino acid part of known epitope (E), or
within flanking (F) region (within 5 amino acid)
Is there evidence for reversion in HLA mismatched
host (R)?
Entire population
High CD4 cell count strata (>500
cells/µl)
Low CD4 cell count strata (<100
cells/µl)
High CD4 cell count strata (>500
cells/µl)
Low CD4 cell count strata (<100
cells/µl)
p-value (likelihood ratio test between pLOR of high
and low CD4 strata)
Gag p17
A29
I
I7V
0.189
Gag p17
A74
K
K12N/Q
R
0.000
0.000
18.83
- (infinity)
0.0070
Gag p17
B5801
K
K12Q
R
0.147
Gag p17
A3303
K
K15S
0.026
0.062
Gag p17
A6801
K
T15
F
0.131
0.086
Gag p17
B45
H
H28R
0.058
- (infinity)
15.05
0.0005
Gag p17
C17
H
H28Q
0.000
0.183
0.017
Gag p17
B4201
M
M30
E
0.004
0.122
14.14
9.44
0.0443
Gag p17
B0801
A
A45S
R
0.128
- (infinity)
5.29
0.0051
Gag p17
A6802
E
E55D
0.015
−6.35
18.13
0.0009
Gag p17
A3402
K
Q62
0.149
(infinity)
−10.24
0.0130
Gag p17
A3001
K
K62S
0.183
10.89
- (infinity)
0.0151
Gag p17
A30
Q
Q65H
R
0.086
9.27
−11.37
0.0086
Gag p17
B8101
Q
K69
0.163
(infinity)
−0.21
0.0027
Gag p17
A26
K
K76R
0.149
Gag p17
B15
Y
79Y
R
0.188
14.22
−1.66
0.0193
Gag p17
C04
K
K91N
R
0.016
15.78
4.21
0.0004
Gag p17
B08
Q
Q112K
0.159
Gag p17
B1402
K
K114
0.069
7.73
- (infinity)
0.0498
Gag p17
B1801
T
T115
0.146
Gag p17
A2902
Y
Y132F
0.188
Gag p24
B57
A
A146P
E
0.000
0.000
0.048
Gag p24
C17
A
P146
R
0.102
Gag p24
B1510
A
A146
E
0.008
0.153
Gag p24
C0304
I
147I
E
0.102
(infinity)
1.41
0.0209
Gag p24
B57
I
I147L/M
E
R
0.000
0.000
Gag p24
C17
Q
Q182
0.017
0.79
4.18
0.0019
Gag p24
B8101
Q
Q182S
E
0.000
0.000
0.017
13.97
16.79
0.0349
Gag p24
B8101
T
T186S
E
R
0.000
0.000
18.38
7.25
0.0397
Gag p24
C0210
V
V218
R
0.056
Gag p24
B5801
T
T242N
E
0.000
0.000
0.000
Gag p24
B57
T
T242N
E
R
0.000
0.000
0.000
Gag p24
A74
I
I247
R
0.087
Gag p24
C04
S
N252
0.189
Gag p24
B35
D
D260E
E
0.000
0.000
Gag p24
B1401
K
K302R
E
R
0.000
0.015
Gag p24
B44
D
D312E
E
R
0.000
0.183
Gag p24
B0702
D
D319E
0.086
Gag p24
C08
T
T332A
0.131
0.015
Gag p24
B0702
G
S357G
E
0.000
0.001
0.000
The table shows the results of the association analysis between HLA
Class I alleles and HIV viral polymorphisms in HIV Gag. The columns
of the table detail the HIV protein, the associated HLA Class I
allele and viral polymorphism, whether the association lies in, or
within, the flanking region of a known restricted epitope and
whether this association is expected to revert in HLA-mismatched
hosts. The q values for the statistically significant associations
for the whole cohort, the ‘high’ CD4 count subgroup
(>500 cells/µl) and ‘low’ CD4 count subgroup
(<100 cells/µl) are shown, followed by the
log2-adjusted odds ratios for the ‘high’ and
‘low’ groups. In the final column, the p value is
reported, where there is a significant difference between the two
odds ratios.
Table 2
HLA-related associated polymorphisms in the HIV Pol protein in
different CD4 count strata.
q-value of HLA-related association in
each strata
Phylogentically corrected Log2 Odds
Ratio (pLOR) towards “escape”
HIV-1 protein
HLA Class I
Population majority consensus amino acid at
associated site
HXB2 site and direction of HLA associated
polymorphism
Is the amino acid part of known epitope (E), or
within flanking (F) region (within 5 amino acid)
Is there evidence for reversion in HLA mismatched
host (R)?
Entire population
High CD4 cell count strata (>500
cells/µl)
Low CD4 cell count strata (<100
cells/µl)
High CD4 cell count strata (>500
cells/µl)
Low CD4 cell count strata (<100
cells/µl)
p-value (likelihood ratio test between pLOR of high
and low CD4 strata)
Protease
C0401
L
L10
R
0.178
Protease
C18
S
S12T
0.010
2.13
16.45
0.0005
Protease
B5802
S
T12S
0.000
0.007
Protease
C06
S
12S
0.007
Protease
B1801
I
I19T
0.162
Protease
B1510
E
D35E
0.155
−5.82
20.55
0.0015
Protease
B44
E
E35D
E
0.000
0.000
Protease
A6601
N
N37
0.167
0.121
Protease
C0602
L
V63T
E
0.192
0.190
13.30
(infinity)
0.0044
Protease
C16
L
P63L
R
0.013
Protease
C18
L
P63S
R
0.000
0.064
Protease
C08
L
63L
0.100
Protease
A43
I
I64L
R
0.167
0.097
- (infinity)
20.66
0.0477
Protease
C06
V
I77V
0.004
0.013
3.60
6.41
0.0129
Protease
A66
V
V77I
0.196
RT
B81
P
P103S/T
E
0.000
0.155
0.000
10.43
22.85
0.0092
RT
C18
E
E105K
0.001
0.178
10.97
−1.39
0.0207
RT
B81
E
E105
E
0.000
0.178
RT
B18
K
K119R
R
0.073
RT
B15
E
E152D
0.035
RT
B4101
E
E152D
0.141
0.080
RT
A34
V
V159I
0.121
0.54
17.36
0.0155
RT
B35
E
E221K
E
0.003
0.178
RT
C02
G
S222
0.002
0.015
RT
B8101
I
I234R
0.131
−5.66
22.55
0.0379
RT
B4202
I
I234V
0.036
RT
B0702
S
S261A/C
E
0.000
0.041
15.26
16.55
0.0348
RT
C0702
S
S261
0.029
RT
B07
T
T264I
E
0.000
0.000
RT
A03
K
K265R
E
R
0.005
0.121
RT
C0702
E
E268
0.010
RT
B1503
K
K273R
E
0.002
0.003
−14.09
18.11
0.0302
RT
A03
K
K273R
F
0.000
0.035
15.22
18.75
0.0444
RT
A80
E
E276D
0.171
0.092
RT
B4403
E
E306K/N/R
E
R
0.000
0.001
RT
B1801
E
E306
0.167
0.131
RT
C06
E
D306
0.143
RT
C04
K
R310K
R
0.072
16.98
17.95
0.0001
RT
A74
K
K310
R
0.178
16.39
−10.22
0.0059
RT
A80
D
D349
0.195
RT
A30
I
I356
R
0.121
RT
A33
P
P371S
0.100
−12.13
5.66
0.0196
RT
B4201
P
P371A
E
0.000
12.06
15.09
0.0040
RT
C1701
P
P371A/S
0.000
0.054
RT
B42
I
I373V
E
R
0.000
0.037
RT
A3001
K
K374
F
0.064
RT
A03
R
K376R
E
0.000
0.006
RT
A3001
K
K380R
0.000
0.005
RT
B57
A
A385V
0.178
RT
C0210
A
A385T
0.198
RT
B15
A
A385V
R
0.099
RT
B45
E
E396K
0.153
RT
C04
D
E423D
R
0.057
0.143
RT
B4403
I
I425V
0.003
2.39
20.64
0.0259
RT
C03
M
R456
0.178
RT
B42
R
457R
0.110
−20.83
(infinity)
0.0039
RT
C06
R
R457K
R
0.000
0.019
RT
A6601
R
R457K
R
0.097
RT
B5802
T
458T
R
0.103
RT
C03
A
A470
R
0.150
RT
C0302
I
I474V
R
0.165
0.000
- (infinity)
(infinity)
0.0015
RT
B15
L
L476I
R
0.128
RT
B5801
S
S478C/A
E
R
0.004
0.001
- (infinity)
16.17
0.0001
RT
A32
E
E498
E
0.080
RT
A3201
T
T499I
E
0.001
0.010
RT
A29
T
499T
0.081
RT
B13
D
D503N
0.007
0.051
RT
B39
A
A534V
0.033
- (infinity)
(infinity)
0.0018
RT
B5802
A
I534
0.196
RT
A6802
A
A536V
E
R
0.007
0.053
15.20
15.75
0.0177
RT
A6601
A
A536V
F
0.001
0.178
0.038
RT
A2301
N
N546H
R
0.073
0.165
12.30
−5.48
0.0030
RT
B4403
E
E548D
0.025
RT
A3303
I
551I
0.198
(infinity)
- (infinity)
0.0000
RT
B5802
I
I551A
R
0.072
RT
B4202
V
V566I
0.143
RT
B08
V
V566I
0.145
RT
B08
S
S567T
0.000
0.003
RT
B08
L
L568
0.190
RT
A3402
T
T569A
R
0.082
0.155
RT
B18
Q
Q582H
E
0.001
0.073
RT
B1503
S
590S
F
R
0.150
−12.70
5.01
0.0196
RT
B44
S
S590L/P
E
R
0.000
0.000
0.74
3.95
0.0408
RT
B1401
S
S590L
F
0.178
RT
B4403
E
E591
E
0.018
0.011
RT
B3910
I
I594V
R
0.000
0.005
RT
B4202
K
K611N
R
0.071
0.120
RT
B5802
L
L616I
0.009
−11.95
17.59
0.0084
RT
C0701
K
K626N
0.188
−5.73
17.64
0.0045
Integrase
B4403
E
E669A
E
R
0.000
0.011
Integrase
B4403
E
E670D
E
R
0.000
0.000
The table shows the results of the association analysis between HLA
Class I alleles and HIV viral polymorphisms in HIV Pol. The columns
of the table detail the HIV protein, the associated HLA Class I
allele and viral polymorphism, whether the association lies in, or
within, the flanking region of a known restricted epitope and
whether this association is expected to revert in HLA-mismatched
hosts. The q values for the statistically significant associations
for the whole cohort, the ‘high’ CD4 count subgroup
(>500 cells/µl) and ‘low’ CD4 count subgroup
(<100 cells/µl) are shown, followed by the
log2-adjusted odds ratios for the ‘high’ and
‘low’ groups. In the final column, the p value is
reported, where there is a significant difference between the two
odds ratios.
Table 3
HLA-related associated polymorphisms in the HIV Nef protein in
different CD4 count strata.
q-value of HLA-related association in
each strata
Phylogentically corrected Log2 Odds
Ratio (pLOR) towards “escape”
HIV-1 protein
HLA Class I
Population majority consensus amino acid at
associated site
HXB2 site and direction of HLA associated
polymorphism
Is the amino acid part of known epitope (E), or
within flanking (F) region (within 5 amino acid)
Is there evidence for reversion in HLA mismatched
host (R)?
Entire population
High CD4 cell count strata (>500
cells/µl)
Low CD4 cell count strata (<100
cells/µl)
High CD4 cell count strata (>500
cells/µl)
Low CD4 cell count strata (<100
cells/µl)
p-value (likelihood ratio test between pLOR of high
and low CD4 strata)
Nef
B07
I
I10R
F
0.178
Nef
A01
E
E24A
0.172
- (infinity)
15.19
0.0024
Nef
B42
A
A26P
R
0.013
0.053
Nef
A6802
A
A53E
0.134
Nef
A0201
C
C55
F
0.033
Nef
B45
E
E65D
E
0.150
- (infinity)
20.98
0.0498
Nef
B45
E
E66D
E
0.000
0.178
Nef
C0702
R
R71K
R
0.000
0.110
0.000
Nef
B8101
L
L76T/V
E
R
0.000
0.018
Nef
B5801
A
A83G
E
0.159
0.003
11.33
26.74
0.0008
Nef
B4403
Y
Y102H
F
0.000
0.000
Nef
B08
K
K105
E
0.178
−23.73
19.71
0.0001
Nef
C0701
K
K105R
E
R
0.000
0.124
0.000
21.77
23.34
0.0290
Nef
B4403
E
E108D
E
0.000
0.011
Nef
B18
E
E108D
E
0.000
0.134
Nef
C0602
Q
Q125H
E
R
0.149
0.030
Nef
B42
P
P129
E
0.150
−15.22
22.70
0.0036
Nef
B53
V
V133I
F
0.078
6.21
21.38
0.0240
Nef
A23
F
F143Y
F
0.000
0.000
Nef
C06
S
S187
R
0.104
The table shows the results of the association analysis between HLA
Class I alleles and HIV viral polymorphisms in HIV Nef. The columns
of the table detail the HIV protein, the associated HLA Class I
allele and viral polymorphism, whether the association lies in, or
within, the flanking region of a known restricted epitope and
whether this association is expected to revert in HLA-mismatched
hosts. The q values for the statistically significant associations
for the whole cohort, the ‘high’ CD4 count subgroup
(>500 cells/µl) and ‘low’ CD4 count subgroup
(<100 cells/µl) are shown, followed by the
log2-adjusted odds ratios for the ‘high’ and
‘low’ groups. In the final column, the p value is
reported, where there is a significant difference between the two
odds ratios.
The table shows the results of the association analysis between HLA
Class I alleles and HIV viral polymorphisms in HIV Gag. The columns
of the table detail the HIV protein, the associated HLA Class I
allele and viral polymorphism, whether the association lies in, or
within, the flanking region of a known restricted epitope and
whether this association is expected to revert in HLA-mismatched
hosts. The q values for the statistically significant associations
for the whole cohort, the ‘high’ CD4 count subgroup
(>500 cells/µl) and ‘low’ CD4 count subgroup
(<100 cells/µl) are shown, followed by the
log2-adjusted odds ratios for the ‘high’ and
‘low’ groups. In the final column, the p value is
reported, where there is a significant difference between the two
odds ratios.The table shows the results of the association analysis between HLA
Class I alleles and HIV viral polymorphisms in HIV Pol. The columns
of the table detail the HIV protein, the associated HLA Class I
allele and viral polymorphism, whether the association lies in, or
within, the flanking region of a known restricted epitope and
whether this association is expected to revert in HLA-mismatched
hosts. The q values for the statistically significant associations
for the whole cohort, the ‘high’ CD4 count subgroup
(>500 cells/µl) and ‘low’ CD4 count subgroup
(<100 cells/µl) are shown, followed by the
log2-adjusted odds ratios for the ‘high’ and
‘low’ groups. In the final column, the p value is
reported, where there is a significant difference between the two
odds ratios.The table shows the results of the association analysis between HLA
Class I alleles and HIV viral polymorphisms in HIV Nef. The columns
of the table detail the HIV protein, the associated HLA Class I
allele and viral polymorphism, whether the association lies in, or
within, the flanking region of a known restricted epitope and
whether this association is expected to revert in HLA-mismatched
hosts. The q values for the statistically significant associations
for the whole cohort, the ‘high’ CD4 count subgroup
(>500 cells/µl) and ‘low’ CD4 count subgroup
(<100 cells/µl) are shown, followed by the
log2-adjusted odds ratios for the ‘high’ and
‘low’ groups. In the final column, the p value is
reported, where there is a significant difference between the two
odds ratios.We identified 40, 91 and 20 associations, respectively, between an HLA Class I
allele and a viral polymorphism in the HIV-1 gag,
pol and nef genes, in either, or both of,
the ‘high’ or ‘low’ CD4 count subgroups. Of these, 16,
28 and 7 associations in HIV-1 gag, pol and
nef, respectively, had significantly different
log2-adjusted odds ratios in the two subgroups. These 51
associations are shown in Figure
2, according to HIV-1 gene. In gag,
pol and nef, respectively, there were 5/16
(31%), 24/28 (86%) and 7/7 (100%) associations that were
more prevalent in the ‘low CD4’ group. These data show that, where
we could detect a difference, associations were more prevalent at lower CD4
counts in pol and nef, suggestive of continued
selection pressure, but that certain associations – particularly in HIV-1
gag – were weaker. Why might HLA associations become
weaker as disease progresses? One possible explanation is that as CTL pressure
weakens due to immune exhaustion and loss of breadth, escape mutations with
replicative fitness costs are no longer required by the virus. These therefore
revert back to wild-type, resulting in a reduction in the observed
log2-adjusted odds ratio. Thus, low-cost mutations accumulate
over the course of infection, leading to higher prevalence in Nef and Pol,
whereas high-cost mutations begin reverting, leading to a lower prevalence in
Gag.
Figure 2
Changes in associations between HLA Class I alleles and HIV amino
acid polymorphisms for patients with CD4 cell counts <100
cells/µl compared with patients with CD4 cell counts >500
cells/µl.
The change in the strength of associations between HLA Class I alleles
and specific HIV amino acid polymorphisms in patients with high and low
CD4 cell counts is shown for HIV-1 (a.) Gag, (b.) Pol and (c.) Nef.
Change in strength of the association is reported on the Y-axis as a
log(2)-adjusted value. Associations are recorded on the X-axis according
to the restricting HLA Class I allele and the specific viral
polymorphism – e.g. B45-H28R in Gag means that in the presence of
HLA B*45, Gag amino acid 28 mutates from a Histidine (H) to an
Arginine (R). In this case there is at least a 40-fold change in the
log(2)-adjusted odds ratio for this association in patients with CD4
counts <100 cells/µl compared with less progressed patients
with CD4 cell counts >500 cells/µl. (All fold changes are
capped at a value of 40).
Changes in associations between HLA Class I alleles and HIV amino
acid polymorphisms for patients with CD4 cell counts <100
cells/µl compared with patients with CD4 cell counts >500
cells/µl.
The change in the strength of associations between HLA Class I alleles
and specific HIV amino acid polymorphisms in patients with high and low
CD4 cell counts is shown for HIV-1 (a.) Gag, (b.) Pol and (c.) Nef.
Change in strength of the association is reported on the Y-axis as a
log(2)-adjusted value. Associations are recorded on the X-axis according
to the restricting HLA Class I allele and the specific viral
polymorphism – e.g. B45-H28R in Gag means that in the presence of
HLA B*45, Gag amino acid 28 mutates from a Histidine (H) to an
Arginine (R). In this case there is at least a 40-fold change in the
log(2)-adjusted odds ratio for this association in patients with CD4
counts <100 cells/µl compared with less progressed patients
with CD4 cell counts >500 cells/µl. (All fold changes are
capped at a value of 40).If changes in selection pressure were resulting in an increase or decrease in the
prevalence of wild type virus during late-stage disease, we would expect to find
changes in viral replicative capacity in patients with low CD4 cell counts. We
therefore undertook assays of viral fitness. As the HIV gag
gene was associated with the most potential examples of immune relaxation we
implemented a fitness assay targeting the gag gene and focussed
on three beneficial HLA Class I alleles (HLA B*57, HLA B*5801, and HLA
B*8101) and one allele associated with more rapid progression, HLA
B*5802. In particular, we highlighted two associations: the T186S mutation
in the TPQDLNTML (TL9) epitope, restricted by B*8101, with an observed
decrease in log2-adjusted odds ratio from 18.38 to 7.25 in patients
with high and low CD4 cell counts, respectively, (consistent with immune
relaxation, p = 0.0397, likelihood ratio test), and the
B*57/B*5801 restricted epitope TSTLQEQIAW (TW10), with
log2-adjusted odds ratios of 25.4 and 23.2 for high and low CD4 cell
count stratification analysis (p = 0.12, likelihood ratio
test, showing no significant evidence of immune relaxation). We focussed on
these two associations as published data suggest that they are both associated
with significant viral fitness costs [32]
[18],
[27] and
yet in this dataset they behave very differently in terms of changes in
log2-adjusted odds ratios.
Increased viral replication capacity (VRC) of chimeric HIV-1 NL4-3 at low CD4
counts and high plasma viral loads
To investigate further possible reasons for declining selection pressure within
Gag epitopes with progression to AIDS, we considered the hypothesis that loss of
CD8+ T-cell responses as CD4 count declines results in reversion of escape
mutants, with resulting increase in viral replicative capacity. To investigate
the impact of the gag-protease mutations selected by different
HLA class I alleles at different clinical stages, we constructed 148 chimeric
HIV-1 NL4-3 viruses containing autologous gag-protease from
patients of the Bloemfontein cohort. Patients with specific HLA class I alleles
previously associated with control of HIV in this population
(HLA-B*57/5801/8101) or lack of control (B*5802) [6] were selected for chimeric
virus construction and stratified by CD4 cell count. 88 viruses were constructed
from patients with low CD4 cell counts (<100 cells/µl), comprising
HLA-B*57 (n = 2), HLA-B*5801
(n = 15), HLA-B*5802 (n = 54) and
HLA-B*8101 (n = 10) plus 14 ‘neutral/other’
(i.e. neither protective or disadvantageous) HLA Class I alleles. From patients
with high CD4 cell counts (>500 cells/µl), 42 viruses were made:
HLA-B*57 (n = 7), HLA-B*5801
(n = 8), HLA-B*5802 (n = 15),
HLA-B*8101 (n = 10) plus 10 ‘neutral/other’
HLA Class I alleles. Sixteen patients co-expressed two of these HLA class I
alleles. A further 18 viruses were made from patients randomly selected from
intermediate CD4 T cell counts. The VRC of the chimeric virus was expressed as
percentage growth rate compared to the pNL4-3Δgag-protease
plasmid recombined with the wild type HIV-1 NL4-3 gag-protease
insert.Initially we determined whether CD4 cell count alone was associated with VRC.
Figure 3a shows that the
VRC of the chimeric viruses from patients from different CD4 T cell count strata
was significantly different (Figure
3a). The VRC from viral isolates from patients with the lowest CD4 T
cell counts (<100 cells/µl, median 91.15%; IQR:
86.1–98.0%) was significantly higher than from patients with high
CD4 T cell counts (>500 cells/µl, median 85.19%; IQR:
79.8%–91.8%), p = 0.0004 (Mann-Whitney
test), showing that progression to AIDS is associated with an increase in viral
fitness.
Figure 3
Viral replication capacity (VRC) according to CD4 cell count and
plasma viral load.
The viral replicative capacity (VRC) of chimeric NL4-3 viruses recombined
with patient autologous gag-protease genes is compared with a laboratory
recombinant HIV-1 NL4-3 strain. In (a.), The VRC of isolates from the
Bloemfontein cohort is presented stratified by CD4 T cell count. The
p-values are calculated using the Mann-Whitney test. In (b.), plasma
viral load (log10 copies/ml) is correlated against the VRC
from samples from the Bloemfontein cohort. In both panels VRC is
presented as a percentage relative to the fitness of the control NL4-3
virus.
Viral replication capacity (VRC) according to CD4 cell count and
plasma viral load.
The viral replicative capacity (VRC) of chimeric NL4-3 viruses recombined
with patient autologous gag-protease genes is compared with a laboratory
recombinant HIV-1 NL4-3 strain. In (a.), The VRC of isolates from the
Bloemfontein cohort is presented stratified by CD4 T cell count. The
p-values are calculated using the Mann-Whitney test. In (b.), plasma
viral load (log10 copies/ml) is correlated against the VRC
from samples from the Bloemfontein cohort. In both panels VRC is
presented as a percentage relative to the fitness of the control NL4-3
virus.There was also a weak but statistically significant positive correlation between
VRC and log10 plasma viral load (Figure 3b, p = 0.0003,
r2 = 0.088, n = 142).
The slope of the best-fit values (0.029±0.0079) indicated that a
34.4% increase in VRC accounted for an increase of one log10
in plasma viral load.
VRC of chimeric gag-protease NL4-3 viruses varies according
to HLA class I
As higher VRCs were associated with higher plasma VL and lower CD4 cell count, we
examined how this effect varied according to HLA Class I (Figure 4a). The VRC of chimeric viruses
derived from patients with the protective alleles HLA B*57
(median = 83%, IQR: 76–89%;
n = 9) and HLA B*8101
(median = 84%, IQR: 78–92%;
n = 20) was significantly lower than from patients with
‘neutral/other’ HLA class I alleles
(median = 91%, IQR: 81–92%;
n = 26); (p = 0.007 and
p = 0.005, respectively), or from patients with HLA
B*5802, associated with more rapid clinical progression
(median = 91%, IQR: 85–98%,
n = 68) (p = 0.010 and
p = 0.008, respectively, Mann-Whitney test).
Figure 4
Viral replication capacity according to HLA Class I and CD4 cell
count.
(a) Viral replication capacity (VRC) of chimeric NL4-3 viruses containing
patient autologous gag-protease stratified by HLA Class I. The VRC is
expressed as percentage growth rate compared to control strains. The
p-value is calculated using Mann-Whitney test. Panel (b.) shows further
stratification according to CD4 cell count. The y-axis depicts VRC,
expressed as percentage growth and the x-axis depicts HLA class I, with
each HLA class I category divided further into “low” CD4 T
cell count strata (<100 cells/mm3) and “high” CD4 T cell
count (>500 cells/mm3). The p-value is calculated using Mann-Whitney
test.
Viral replication capacity according to HLA Class I and CD4 cell
count.
(a) Viral replication capacity (VRC) of chimeric NL4-3 viruses containing
patient autologous gag-protease stratified by HLA Class I. The VRC is
expressed as percentage growth rate compared to control strains. The
p-value is calculated using Mann-Whitney test. Panel (b.) shows further
stratification according to CD4 cell count. The y-axis depicts VRC,
expressed as percentage growth and the x-axis depicts HLA class I, with
each HLA class I category divided further into “low” CD4 T
cell count strata (<100 cells/mm3) and “high” CD4 T cell
count (>500 cells/mm3). The p-value is calculated using Mann-Whitney
test.To determine whether the association between HLA Class I and viral fitness was
additionally impacted by disease stage we stratified the VRCs according to high
and low CD4 cell counts (Figure
4b). This sub-group analysis shows that the mean VRC values are
higher for each HLA Class I allele in the low CD4 count group suggestive of an
increase in viral fitness in advanced disease, although in most cases these
values are not statistically significant. This is likely to be an effect of
being underpowered, as patient numbers become smaller with each
sub-categorisation. Interestingly, there is a significant difference in the VRCs
of viruses in the non-protective ‘neutral/other’ HLA Class I alleles
(p = 0.0092, Mann-Whitney test), showing that although
there is an HLA-specific effect on viral fitness, there is an additional
association with CD4 cell count, independent of the more beneficial HLA Class I
alleles.
The impact of specific mutations on VRC in the context of HLA-B*8101 and
HLA-B*B57/B*58
These analyses have shown that viral fitness is greater in viruses from patients
with advanced disease, and that certain protective HLA Class I alleles (such as
B*57, B*8101 and B*5801) are associated with greater fitness costs.
The HLA-association analysis presented above (Tables 1,2 and 3) revealed that in patients with low CD4
counts HLA B*57/*5801 was associated with persistence of T242N in the
TW10 epitope, whereas HLA B*8101 was associated with a potential loss of
selection pressure reflected by the decreased prevalence of T186S mutants in the
TL9 epitope. We therefore focused further on these well-characterised escape
mutants to investigate how they impacted viral fitness at different stages of
disease progression.For HLA-B*8101, we excluded from the analysis any viruses with key mutations
restricted by other HLA Class I alleles (that is, T242N and A163G) which were
known to impact fitness. Viruses from patients with HLA B*8101 were
significantly less fit than viruses from patients in the rest of the cohort
(p = 0.0059, Mann-Whitney test; Figure 5a) and mutations in the
B*8101-restricted Gag TL9 epitope were associated with lower VRCs
(p = 0.024) both in the whole cohort and in patients with
HLA B*8101 (p = 0.025). The main single mutation
conferring loss of replicative fitness was the T186S immune escape mutation
(p<0.0001). Neither the Q182S or T190X mutations had an impact on VRC in this
cohort (data not shown). Although patient numbers were small, there was no
significant difference between the VRCs of viruses with the T186S mutation
according to high and low CD4 count stratification. These data show that
although B*8101 imposes a fitness cost on the virus through selection of
T186S, we found no evidence that, when this mutation persists, the fitness cost
is restored at low CD4 cell counts.
Figure 5
Viral replication capacity (VRC) in viruses with mutants in (a) Gag
TL9 and (b) Gag TW10 according to HLA Class I and CD4 cell
count.
In panel (a), the y-axis depicts viral replication fitness (VRC) of
chimeric NL4-3 viruses containing patient autologous
gag-protease, expressed as percentage growth rate
compared to a control recombinant NL4-3 strain. The x-axis depicts the
stratification of patients according to (i) HLA-B*8101, (ii)
polymorphic status within the gag TL9 epitope in all
patients, (iii) polymorphic status of gag TL9 in
patients with HLA B*8101, (iv) presence of T186S in
gag in Gag TL9, and (v) T186S further stratified
according to the CD4 T cell count (<100 cells/µl or >500
cells/µl). The p-value is calculated using Mann-Whitney test. In
(b), patients are stratified according to (i) HLA-B*57 or B*5801
alleles, (ii) polymorphic status within the gag TW10
epitope, (iii) polymorphic status of TW10 in patients with HLA-B*57
or B*5801 alleles, (iv) polymorphic status of amino acid position
242 (within TW10 epitope – T242N) in all patients and (v) by T242N
in patients with HLA-B*57 or B*5801 according to CD4 count. The
viral isolates possessing other known costly escape mutations (A163G and
T186S) are excluded from this analysis. The p-value is calculated using
Mann Whitney test.
Viral replication capacity (VRC) in viruses with mutants in (a) Gag
TL9 and (b) Gag TW10 according to HLA Class I and CD4 cell
count.
In panel (a), the y-axis depicts viral replication fitness (VRC) of
chimeric NL4-3 viruses containing patient autologous
gag-protease, expressed as percentage growth rate
compared to a control recombinant NL4-3 strain. The x-axis depicts the
stratification of patients according to (i) HLA-B*8101, (ii)
polymorphic status within the gag TL9 epitope in all
patients, (iii) polymorphic status of gag TL9 in
patients with HLA B*8101, (iv) presence of T186S in
gag in Gag TL9, and (v) T186S further stratified
according to the CD4 T cell count (<100 cells/µl or >500
cells/µl). The p-value is calculated using Mann-Whitney test. In
(b), patients are stratified according to (i) HLA-B*57 or B*5801
alleles, (ii) polymorphic status within the gag TW10
epitope, (iii) polymorphic status of TW10 in patients with HLA-B*57
or B*5801 alleles, (iv) polymorphic status of amino acid position
242 (within TW10 epitope – T242N) in all patients and (v) by T242N
in patients with HLA-B*57 or B*5801 according to CD4 count. The
viral isolates possessing other known costly escape mutations (A163G and
T186S) are excluded from this analysis. The p-value is calculated using
Mann Whitney test.We compared the fitness costs associated with HLA B*8101 with those
associated with B*57 and B*5801, as the HLA-association analysis
suggested that for these latter alleles escape mutations persisted in advanced
disease. We pooled the data for patients with HLA B*57 and B*5801 as
these alleles have highly related binding motifs, and both present the Gag TW10
epitope and select the T242N escape mutation [36]. As for HLA B*8101,
viruses from patients with HLA-B*57 or HLA-B*5801 were significantly
less fit than those from the rest of the cohort
(p = 0.0299, Mann-Whitney test; Figure 5b), supporting the association
between protective HLA Class I alleles and viral replicative cost (Figure 4a). In the whole
cohort there was no significant effect of all mutations in the TW10 epitope on
VRC. For patients with HLA B*57 or B*5801, there was a non-significant
trend for all mutations within the TW10 epitope to impair fitness, although the
power of this analysis was limited as only one of the 22 patients had not
selected a mutant epitope. However, the fitness cost of the T242N mutation was
confirmed when the whole cohort was analysed, when it was associated with a
significant drop in VRC (p = 0.0285). This result was
independent of the effect of mutations in other B*57/B*5801 associated
epitopes such as Gag KF11 or Gag IW9 (p = 0.024; data not
shown), showing that the fitness cost was associated with T242N, rather than
reflecting being positive for HLA B*57/B*5801.In the HLA-association analysis we had found that T242N was maintained in late
disease, even though these data, as well as previous reports, suggest that this
mutation is associated with a fitness cost. We explored this apparent
discrepancy by stratifying the fitness analysis of T242N according to CD4 count
(Figure 5b), and found
that in patients with advanced disease (CD4 counts <100 cells/µl),
viral fitness had been restored even though the T242N persisted
(p = 0.0028).
Compensatory mutations accrue in advanced HIV infection in patients with HLA
B*57 and B*5801
As the T242N mutation has been previously linked with compensatory mutations we
analysed our cohort to see if these accrued in late stage disease to explain the
rise in viral fitness despite the maintenance of T242N. For the T242N mutation
in TW10, compensatory mutations have previously been published (H219Q, I223V and
M228) [27],
and so we examined the frequency of these mutations in the different CD4 T cell
count strata (Figure 6). We
found a cumulative increase in the number of compensatory mutations in patients
with T242N in individuals with lower CD4 cell counts, consistent with the
increase in fitness in the previous analyses
(P = 0.013).
Figure 6
Prevalence of compensatory mutations with the T242N mutation in the
HLA-B57 and B*5801 restricted epitope, Gag TW10.
In the 100% stacked column, the y-axis shows the number of
mutations accumulated at the three Gag protein amino acid sites (H219Q,
I223V and M228I) that compensate for the T242N mutation [27].
The x-axis depicts the categorical CD4 T cell count strata and the
number of patients within each strata (the “High CD4” group
refers to patients with CD4 T cell counts >500 cells/µl, the
“Intermediate CD4” group refers to patients with CD4 T cell
counts between 200 and 400 cells/µl, and the “Low CD4”
group refers to patients with CD4 T cell counts <100
cells/µl).
Prevalence of compensatory mutations with the T242N mutation in the
HLA-B57 and B*5801 restricted epitope, Gag TW10.
In the 100% stacked column, the y-axis shows the number of
mutations accumulated at the three Gag protein amino acid sites (H219Q,
I223V and M228I) that compensate for the T242N mutation [27].
The x-axis depicts the categorical CD4 T cell count strata and the
number of patients within each strata (the “High CD4” group
refers to patients with CD4 T cell counts >500 cells/µl, the
“Intermediate CD4” group refers to patients with CD4 T cell
counts between 200 and 400 cells/µl, and the “Low CD4”
group refers to patients with CD4 T cell counts <100
cells/µl).Together these data suggest that advanced HIV disease is associated with an
increase in viral fitness, which may contribute to the rise in plasma viral load
frequently seen in AIDS. However, this increase in fitness is multifactorial and
we report two processes specific to different HLA Class I alleles –
reversion due to immune relaxation and compensatory mutations – to
potentially explain these findings.
Discussion
In this study, we have explored the hypothesis that progression to AIDS is associated
with a rise in viral replicative capacity, and the mechanisms associated with this.
We proposed that a rise in viral fitness in AIDS could be due either to a relaxation
of CTL-imposed selection pressure resulting in the reversion of costly mutations or,
alternatively, if immune pressure is maintained, compensatory mutations might
restore the fitness costs of persisting escape mutations.We initially tested the hypothesis by looking for evidence of changes in T
cell-imposed selection pressure measured by gamma interferon ELISPOT assays. We
found that the breadth of the response narrowed as the CD4 count declined and that,
specifically, the contribution of Gag responses to the overall response decreased.
It has previously been reported that acute HIV infection is associated with narrow,
high affinity T cell responses which broaden as patients progress into chronic
infection [37].
Here, we see the reverse of this process with a return to a much narrower range of T
cell responses. It would also be interesting to measure whether there was a loss of
high affinity T cells in the advanced stage patients in this cohort as this might be
compatible with a weakening in selection pressure.Although we identified a narrowing of the T cell responses in AIDS, the ELISPOT data
alone are not sufficient to infer changes in selection pressure. We therefore looked
for evidence of differential selection in patients with high and low CD4 cell counts
using a statistical HLA Class I association study. By combining sequence and HLA
data from the Bloemfontein cohort and the Durban cohort, we were able to define two
groups of patients with CD4 counts less than 100 cells/µl
(n = 196) and greater than 500 cells/µl
(n = 299). These CD4 count strata were defined to represent
extremes of HIV-related disease without reducing the power of the analysis. The WHO
have defined that antiretroviral therapy should be commenced at a CD4 count of 350
cells/µl. Below 200 cells/µl, opportunistic infections become more
common. A count of 100 cells/µl or below, therefore, represents advanced HIV
disease and progression to AIDS. Above 500 CD4 cells/µl it would be highly
unusual for there to be opportunistic infections and the most recent NIH guidelines
do not recommend treating above this level [38].To identify mutations in the HIV genome associated with individual HLA Class I
alleles we used an established technique using phylogenetic dependency networks
[31], which
has been widely implemented in the HIV literature [12], [14], [35], [39]. In this approach, the risk
of error due to viral founder effects and misidentification of co-variant sites is
corrected for by integrating the phylogeny of the sequences into the analysis.
Identified associations are hypothesised to be the result of cytotoxic T cell
imposed selection pressure and in other analyses such associations have been proven
experimentally. Although there have been a number of HLA-association studies
reported, none have stratified patients according to disease progression and
compared the strength of selection in different strata according to
log2-adjusted odds ratios.In our cohorts we identified 151 HLA-associated mutations in HIV-1
gag, pol or nef that were
significant in patients with either high or low CD4 cell counts. By comparing
log2 adjusted odds ratios in the CD4 strata, we found that there was
evidence for both immune relaxation and intensification in patients with low CD4
counts compared with high CD4 counts. This suggests that for some HLA Class
I–restricted responses the selection pressure imposed by CTL is maintained at
very low CD4 cell counts but that for others there may be reversion of escape
mutations associated with a reduction in selection pressure. Interestingly, the
majority of events compatible with immune relaxation were in HIV Gag, which was also
the protein for which there was a relative narrowing of T cell ELISPOT responses in
AIDS patients.Two key sites potentially reflecting immune ‘persistence’ and
‘relaxation’ were the HLA B*57/B*5801 associated T242N mutation
and the B*8101 associated T186S mutation, respectively. For the former, the
association analysis provided evidence for on-going mutation associated with
compensatory mutations, whereas for the latter there was evidence for reversion. A
limitation of this study is that it is cross-sectional rather than longitudinal,
potentially biasing our data interpretation. An alternative explanation for immune
relaxation is that the patients who progress are the ones who do not make an immune
response and so do not select mutants, therefore enriching patients with low CD4
counts with wild-type viruses. This would be compatible with the finding that
targeting certain key epitopes may be associated with different speeds of clinical
progression [40],
but does not explain the eventual outcome of those patients enriched for immune
escape mutations with high CD4 cell counts. To determine which occurs would require
a prospective longitudinal study of untreated progression to AIDS. In our cohort,
analyses of HLA B*8101 positive individuals with data on ELISPOT responses and
viral sequence, show that for patients with CD4 counts between 200–500
cells/µl, 50% (3/6) who did not recognise TL9 carried the T186S mutant.
In contrast, for patients with CD4 counts <100 cells/µl there were no
ELISPOT negative patients with T186S (0/2), suggesting that these had reverted
rather than having been consistently wild type, although in this study numbers are
too small to be conclusive.Viral fitness was measured using a recombinant assay in which a patient-derived
RT-PCR amplicon of HIV-1 gag-protease was inserted into a
gag-protease-deleted pNL4-3 plasmid. The advantage of this
approach is that it uses the full gag gene from the patient
sequence as well as the associated protease that encodes the enzyme
for cleavage of the Gag-Pol protein. The disadvantage of this assay is that it is in
a parallel rather than competitive format, and therefore may lack sensitivity for
small fitness differences. In addition, the construct is a recombinant of a subtype
B backbone with a subtype C insert. Although this approach has been published
elsewhere [32],
any data should be interpreted relative to the control virus rather than as an
absolute measure of viral fitness. Choice of control is important. We used a subtype
B wild-type backbone (pNL4-3Δgag-protease) into which we
recombined the pNL4-3 gag-protease. This controlled for any change
in fitness due to the recombination step.We found that VRC was significantly greater in patients with low CD4 cell counts and
there was a significant, although weak, correlation with plasma viral load. These
data, which are consistent with a population-based study of HIV subtype B-infected
individuals [33], are amongst the first supporting a link between viral
fitness and plasma viral load, and show that this ex vivo assay
reflects viral replication in vivo. Analysing our data by HLA Class
I revealed that HLA Class I alleles that are associated with clinical advantage
(B*8101, B*57, B*5801) were associated with impaired viral fitness, as
had been inferred from previous analyses of the reversion of transmitted escape
mutations in HLA mismatched hosts [22], [23]. Interestingly, however, the increase in viral fitness
with lower CD4 cell counts did not appear to be restricted to beneficial HLA alleles
and was also present in a selection of viruses from patients with
‘neutral/other’ alleles.The HLA-amino acid association analysis showed that for HLA B*8101 there was a
decrease in mutations in the Gag TL9 epitope at low CD4 cell counts, whereas for HLA
B*57/B*5801 there was persistence of the T242N escape mutation in TW10. The
fitness assays showed that the T186S mutation in TL9 was associated with a fitness
cost (P<0.0001) and it is therefore possible that in patients with B*8101 and
low CD4 counts, the decrease in prevalence of the T186S mutation reflects reversion
to a fitter strain coincident with the weakening of T cell responses. For
B*57/B*5801 we saw a different pattern. Here, possession of HLA
B*57/B*5801 was associated with less fit viruses in conjunction with the
T242N mutation in the Gag TW10 epitope, but in patients with low CD4 counts fitness
was restored even though T242N persisted. We therefore sought compensatory mutations
to explain this finding. For T242N there are four documented compensatory mutations
at Gag codons 219, 223, 228 and 248 [27]. For this analysis of subtype
C HIV-1 we excluded codon 248, as the 248A variant represents the subtype C
consensus. When we stratified patients with T242N according to CD4 strata we found a
significant (p = 0.013) increase in numbers of compensatory
mutations at lower CD4 counts, consistent with the rise in VRC.These data show that viral fitness increases with progression to AIDS. Whether this
is cause or effect is difficult to determine, although the fact that we see evidence
for both reversion and compensatory mutations in the same cohort indicates that
progression may be a mixture of the two. What is clear is that viral fitness is a
significant component of progression to AIDS and, as such, should be considered as a
target for intervention, for example through vaccines aimed at epitopes which escape
with high fitness costs. Trials such as DART have shown that antiretroviral therapy
can be extremely effective in regions such as sub-Saharan Africa [41], however the
costs and logistics of provision are complex. Any intervention that could prevent
new infections or delay a requirement for therapy could have major economic and
health implications and therefore combining such a vaccine with antiretroviral
provision could be a productive strategy.
Authors: Photini Kiepiela; Alasdair J Leslie; Isobella Honeyborne; Danni Ramduth; Christina Thobakgale; Senica Chetty; Prinisha Rathnavalu; Corey Moore; Katja J Pfafferott; Louise Hilton; Peter Zimbwa; Sarah Moore; Todd Allen; Christian Brander; Marylyn M Addo; Marcus Altfeld; Ian James; Simon Mallal; Michael Bunce; Linda D Barber; James Szinger; Cheryl Day; Paul Klenerman; James Mullins; Bette Korber; Hoosen M Coovadia; Bruce D Walker; Philip J R Goulder Journal: Nature Date: 2004-12-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Mark A Brockman; Zabrina L Brumme; Chanson J Brumme; Toshiyuki Miura; Jennifer Sela; Pamela C Rosato; Carl M Kadie; Jonathan M Carlson; Tristan J Markle; Hendrik Streeck; Anthony D Kelleher; Martin Markowitz; Heiko Jessen; Eric Rosenberg; Marcus Altfeld; P Richard Harrigan; David Heckerman; Bruce D Walker; Todd M Allen Journal: J Virol Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Jaclyn K Wright; Zabrina L Brumme; Jonathan M Carlson; David Heckerman; Carl M Kadie; Chanson J Brumme; Bingxia Wang; Elena Losina; Toshiyuki Miura; Fundisiwe Chonco; Mary van der Stok; Zenele Mncube; Karen Bishop; Philip J R Goulder; Bruce D Walker; Mark A Brockman; Thumbi Ndung'u Journal: J Virol Date: 2010-08-11 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Rajesh T Gandhi; Alysse Wurcel; Eric S Rosenberg; Mary N Johnston; Nicholas Hellmann; Michael Bates; Martin S Hirsch; Bruce D Walker Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2003-11-17 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Philippa C Matthews; Andrew Prendergast; Alasdair Leslie; Hayley Crawford; Rebecca Payne; Christine Rousseau; Morgane Rolland; Isobella Honeyborne; Jonathan Carlson; Carl Kadie; Christian Brander; Karen Bishop; Nonkululeko Mlotshwa; James I Mullins; Hoosen Coovadia; Thumbi Ndung'u; Bruce D Walker; David Heckerman; Philip J R Goulder Journal: J Virol Date: 2008-07-02 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Zabrina L Brumme; Chanson J Brumme; Jonathan Carlson; Hendrik Streeck; Mina John; Quentin Eichbaum; Brian L Block; Brett Baker; Carl Kadie; Martin Markowitz; Heiko Jessen; Anthony D Kelleher; Eric Rosenberg; John Kaldor; Yuko Yuki; Mary Carrington; Todd M Allen; Simon Mallal; Marcus Altfeld; David Heckerman; Bruce D Walker Journal: J Virol Date: 2008-07-09 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Christine M Rousseau; Marcus G Daniels; Jonathan M Carlson; Carl Kadie; Hayley Crawford; Andrew Prendergast; Philippa Matthews; Rebecca Payne; Morgane Rolland; Dana N Raugi; Brandon S Maust; Gerald H Learn; David C Nickle; Hoosen Coovadia; Thumbi Ndung'u; Nicole Frahm; Christian Brander; Bruce D Walker; Philip J R Goulder; Tanmoy Bhattacharya; David E Heckerman; Bette T Korber; James I Mullins Journal: J Virol Date: 2008-04-23 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Toshiyuki Miura; Mark A Brockman; Zabrina L Brumme; Chanson J Brumme; Florencia Pereyra; Alicja Trocha; Brian L Block; Arne Schneidewind; Todd M Allen; David Heckerman; Bruce D Walker Journal: J Virol Date: 2008-10-29 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Zabrina L Brumme; Chanson J Brumme; David Heckerman; Bette T Korber; Marcus Daniels; Jonathan Carlson; Carl Kadie; Tanmoy Bhattacharya; Celia Chui; James Szinger; Theresa Mo; Robert S Hogg; Julio S G Montaner; Nicole Frahm; Christian Brander; Bruce D Walker; P Richard Harrigan Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Jaclyn K Wright; Vanessa L Naidoo; Zabrina L Brumme; Jessica L Prince; Daniel T Claiborne; Philip J R Goulder; Mark A Brockman; Eric Hunter; Thumbi Ndung'u Journal: J Virol Date: 2012-01-11 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Mark A Brockman; Denis R Chopera; Alex Olvera; Chanson J Brumme; Jennifer Sela; Tristan J Markle; Eric Martin; Jonathan M Carlson; Anh Q Le; Rachel McGovern; Peter K Cheung; Anthony D Kelleher; Heiko Jessen; Martin Markowitz; Eric Rosenberg; Nicole Frahm; Jorge Sanchez; Simon Mallal; Mina John; P Richard Harrigan; David Heckerman; Christian Brander; Bruce D Walker; Zabrina L Brumme Journal: J Virol Date: 2012-04-11 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Vanessa L Naidoo; Jaclyn K Mann; Christie Noble; Emily Adland; Jonathan M Carlson; Jake Thomas; Chanson J Brumme; Christina F Thobakgale-Tshabalala; Zabrina L Brumme; Mark A Brockman; Philip J R Goulder; Thumbi Ndung'u Journal: J Virol Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Marion W Kiguoya; Jaclyn K Mann; Denis Chopera; Kamini Gounder; Guinevere Q Lee; Peter W Hunt; Jeffrey N Martin; T Blake Ball; Joshua Kimani; Zabrina L Brumme; Mark A Brockman; Thumbi Ndung'u Journal: J Virol Date: 2017-06-09 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Jonathan M Carlson; Chanson J Brumme; Eric Martin; Jennifer Listgarten; Mark A Brockman; Anh Q Le; Celia K S Chui; Laura A Cotton; David J H F Knapp; Sharon A Riddler; Richard Haubrich; George Nelson; Nico Pfeifer; Charles E Deziel; David Heckerman; Richard Apps; Mary Carrington; Simon Mallal; P Richard Harrigan; Mina John; Zabrina L Brumme Journal: J Virol Date: 2012-10-10 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Florencia Pereyra; David Heckerman; Jonathan M Carlson; Carl Kadie; Damien Z Soghoian; Daniel Karel; Ariel Goldenthal; Oliver B Davis; Charles E DeZiel; Tienho Lin; Jian Peng; Alicja Piechocka; Mary Carrington; Bruce D Walker Journal: J Virol Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Henrik N Kløverpris; Reuben McGregor; James E McLaren; Kristin Ladell; Mikkel Harndahl; Anette Stryhn; Jonathan M Carlson; Catherine Koofhethile; Bram Gerritsen; Can Keşmir; Fabian Chen; Lynn Riddell; Graz Luzzi; Alasdair Leslie; Bruce D Walker; Thumbi Ndung'u; Søren Buus; David A Price; Philip J Goulder Journal: J Immunol Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Andrew L Ferguson; Jaclyn K Mann; Saleha Omarjee; Thumbi Ndung'u; Bruce D Walker; Arup K Chakraborty Journal: Immunity Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 31.745