Literature DB >> 29338305

Safety and feasibility of prostate stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using multimodality imaging and flattening filter free.

Aileen Duffton1, Azmat Sadozye1, Lynsey Devlin1, Nicholas MacLeod1, Carolynn Lamb1, Suzanne Currie2, Philip McLoone3, Marimuthu Sankaralingam2, John Foster2, Stephanie Paterson1, Stefanie Keatings2, David Dodds1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate feasibility and safety of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in the management of prostate cancer while employing MR/CT fusion for delineation, fiducial marker seeds for positioning and Varian RapidArc with flattening filter free (FFF) delivery.
METHODS: 41 patients were treated for low-intermediate risk prostate cancer with initial prostate-specific antigen of ≤20 ng ml-1, Gleason score 6-7. Patients had MR/CT fusion for delineation of prostate ±seminal vesicles. CT/MR fusion images were used for delineation and planned using flattening filter free modality. Verification on treatment was cone beam CT imaging with fiducial markers for matching. Patients had Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scoring for genitourinary and gastointestinal symptoms at baseline, week 4, 10 and 18.
RESULTS: Clinically acceptable plans were achieved for all patients, all plans achieved the objective clinical target volume D99% ≥ 95%, and for planning target volume D95% ≥ 95%. Rectum dose constraints were met for 95.1% for V18 Gy ≤ 35%, 80% V28 Gy ≤ 10%. A total of 32 (78.0%) plans achieved all rectum dose constraints. Grade 1 acute genitourinary symptoms were 53.7% of patients at baseline, 90.2% [95% CI (76.8-97.3%)] (p = 0.0005) at treatment 5, falling to 78.0% (62.4-89.4%) at week 4, and 75.0% (58.8-87.3%) by week 10 and 52.5% (36.1-68.5%) (p = 1.00) at week 18. Acute gastrointestinal symptoms were 5% at baseline, 46.3% [95% CI (30.7-62.6%)] at treatment 5, week 4 43.9% [95% CI (28.5-60.3%)], week 10 25.0% (11.1-42.3%), and declined slightly by week 18 [-20.095% CI (12.7-41.2)] p = 0.039. Overall 75.6% (31/41) of patients experienced Grade 1-2 toxicity during or after treatment.
CONCLUSION: This planning and delivery technique is feasible, safe and efficient. A homogeneous dose can be delivered to prostate with confidence, whilst limiting high dose to nearby structures. The use of this technology can be applied safely within further randomized study protocols. Advances in knowledge: Multimodality imaging for delineation and linac-based image-guided RT with FFF for the treatment of prostate stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29338305      PMCID: PMC5966012          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  21 in total

1.  Radiotherapy equipment and departments in the European countries: final results from the ESTRO-HERO survey.

Authors:  Cai Grau; Noémie Defourny; Julian Malicki; Peter Dunscombe; Josep M Borras; Mary Coffey; Ben Slotman; Marta Bogusz; Chiara Gasparotto; Yolande Lievens; Arianit Kokobobo; Felix Sedlmayer; Elena Slobina; Karen Feyen; Tatiana Hadjieva; Karel Odrazka; Jesper Grau Eriksen; Jana Jaal; Ritva Bly; Bruno Chauvet; Normann Willich; Csaba Polgar; Jakob Johannsson; Moya Cunningham; Stefano Magrini; Vydmantas Atkocius; Michel Untereiner; Martin Pirotta; Vanja Karadjinovic; Sverre Levernes; Krystol Sladowski; Maria Lurdes Trigo; Barbara Šegedin; Aurora Rodriguez; Magnus Lagerlund; Bert Pastoors; Peter Hoskin; Jaap Vaarkamp; Ramon Cleries Soler
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  The influence of MRI scan position on image registration accuracy, target delineation and calculated dose in prostatic radiotherapy.

Authors:  S Hanvey; A H Sadozye; M McJury; M Glegg; J Foster
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: results of the Dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy.

Authors:  Stephanie T H Peeters; Wilma D Heemsbergen; Peter C M Koper; Wim L J van Putten; Annerie Slot; Michel F H Dielwart; Johannes M G Bonfrer; Luca Incrocci; Joos V Lebesque
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Fractionation and protraction for radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  D J Brenner; E J Hall
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Dose-fractionation sensitivity of prostate cancer deduced from radiotherapy outcomes of 5,969 patients in seven international institutional datasets: α/β = 1.4 (0.9-2.2) Gy.

Authors:  Raymond Miralbell; Stephen A Roberts; Eduardo Zubizarreta; Jolyon H Hendry
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Long-term outcomes from a prospective trial of stereotactic body radiotherapy for low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher R King; James D Brooks; Harcharan Gill; Joseph C Presti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Prostate stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy using a standard linear accelerator: toxicity, biochemical, and pathological outcomes.

Authors:  Andrew Loblaw; Patrick Cheung; Laura D'Alimonte; Andrea Deabreu; Alexandre Mamedov; Liying Zhang; Colin Tang; Harvey Quon; Suneil Jain; Geordi Pang; Robert Nam
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: interim results of a prospective phase II clinical trial.

Authors:  Christopher R King; James D Brooks; Harcharan Gill; Todd Pawlicki; Cristian Cotrutz; Joseph C Presti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Linac based SBRT for prostate cancer in 5 fractions with VMAT and flattening filter free beams: preliminary report of a phase II study.

Authors:  Filippo Alongi; Luca Cozzi; Stefano Arcangeli; Cristina Iftode; Tiziana Comito; Elisa Villa; Francesca Lobefalo; Pierina Navarria; Giacomo Reggiori; Pietro Mancosu; Elena Clerici; Antonella Fogliata; Stefano Tomatis; Gianluigi Taverna; Pierpaolo Graziotti; Marta Scorsetti
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  The early toxicity of escalated versus standard dose conformal radiotherapy with neo-adjuvant androgen suppression for patients with localised prostate cancer: results from the MRC RT01 trial (ISRCTN47772397).

Authors:  David P Dearnaley; Matthew R Sydes; Ruth E Langley; John D Graham; Robert A Huddart; Isabel Syndikus; John H L Matthews; Christopher D Scrase; Chakiath C Jose; John Logue; Richard J Stephens
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 6.280

View more
  2 in total

1.  Dosimetric impact of organ at risk daily variation during prostate stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lynsey Devlin; David Dodds; Azmat Sadozye; Philip McLoone; Nicholas MacLeod; Carolynn Lamb; Suzanne Currie; Stefanie Thomson; Aileen Duffton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Diversity in radiation therapist/therapeutic radiographer (RTT) advanced practice (AP) roles delivering on the four domains.

Authors:  Aileen Duffton; Karen Moore; Aoife Williamson
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-03-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.