BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It has been suggested that the non-euphorogenic phytocannabinoid cannabidiol (CBD) can ameliorate adverse effects of Δ9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). We determined whether CBD ameliorates cognitive deficits and withdrawal signs induced by cannabinoid CB1 /CB2 receptor agonists or produces these pharmacological effects on its own. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The effects of THC or the CB1 /CB2 receptor full agonist WIN55212 alone, CBD alone or their combination were tested across a range of doses. Cognitive effects were assessed in C57BL/6 mice in a conditional discrimination task and in the Barnes maze. Cannabinoid withdrawal signs were assessed following precipitated withdrawal by acute administration of the CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716, the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY100635, the TRPV1 receptor antagonist capsazepine or the adenosine A2A receptor antagonist SCH58261. KEY RESULTS: THC produced significant motor and cognitive impairment in the Barnes maze task, none of which were attenuated by the addition of CBD. CBD alone did not affect cognitive performance. Precipitation of withdrawal signs by SR141716 occurred in mice chronically treated with THC or WIN55,212. These withdrawal signs were not attenuated by addition of chronic CBD. Chronic treatment with CBD alone did not induce withdrawal signs precipitated by SR141716 or WAY100635. Chronic CBD treatment also produced anxiolysis, which was not altered by attempting to precipitate withdrawal-induced anxiety with a range of antagonists. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: CBD as a monotherapy may prove to be a safer pharmacological agent, than CB1 receptor agonists alone or in combination with CBD, for the treatment of several disorders. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on 8th European Workshop on Cannabinoid Research. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v176.10/issuetoc.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It has been suggested that the non-euphorogenic phytocannabinoidcannabidiol (CBD) can ameliorate adverse effects of Δ9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). We determined whether CBD ameliorates cognitive deficits and withdrawal signs induced by cannabinoidCB1 /CB2 receptor agonists or produces these pharmacological effects on its own. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The effects of THC or the CB1 /CB2 receptor full agonist WIN55212 alone, CBD alone or their combination were tested across a range of doses. Cognitive effects were assessed in C57BL/6 mice in a conditional discrimination task and in the Barnes maze. Cannabinoid withdrawal signs were assessed following precipitated withdrawal by acute administration of the CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716, the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY100635, the TRPV1 receptor antagonist capsazepine or the adenosine A2A receptor antagonist SCH58261. KEY RESULTS:THC produced significant motor and cognitive impairment in the Barnes maze task, none of which were attenuated by the addition of CBD. CBD alone did not affect cognitive performance. Precipitation of withdrawal signs by SR141716 occurred in mice chronically treated with THC or WIN55,212. These withdrawal signs were not attenuated by addition of chronic CBD. Chronic treatment with CBD alone did not induce withdrawal signs precipitated by SR141716 or WAY100635. Chronic CBD treatment also produced anxiolysis, which was not altered by attempting to precipitate withdrawal-induced anxiety with a range of antagonists. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: CBD as a monotherapy may prove to be a safer pharmacological agent, than CB1 receptor agonists alone or in combination with CBD, for the treatment of several disorders. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on 8th European Workshop on Cannabinoid Research. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v176.10/issuetoc.
Authors: Erin M Rock; Cheryl L Limebeer; Gavin N Petrie; Lauren A Williams; Raphael Mechoulam; Linda A Parker Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Sara Jane Ward; Sean D McAllister; Rumi Kawamura; Ryuchi Murase; Harshini Neelakantan; Ellen A Walker Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Matthijs G Bossong; J Martijn Jansma; Hendrika H van Hell; Gerry Jager; Erik Oudman; Emi Saliasi; René S Kahn; Nick F Ramsey Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-02-17 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Stephen Ph Alexander; Arthur Christopoulos; Anthony P Davenport; Eamonn Kelly; Neil V Marrion; John A Peters; Elena Faccenda; Simon D Harding; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Christopher Southan; Jamie A Davies Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: H Valerie Curran; Catherine Brignell; Sally Fletcher; Paul Middleton; John Henry Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2002-07-23 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: José Alexandre S Crippa; Guilherme Nogueira Derenusson; Thiago Borduqui Ferrari; Lauro Wichert-Ana; Fábio L S Duran; Rocio Martin-Santos; Marcus Vinícius Simões; Sagnik Bhattacharyya; Paolo Fusar-Poli; Zerrin Atakan; Alaor Santos Filho; Maria Cecília Freitas-Ferrari; Philip K McGuire; Antonio Waldo Zuardi; Geraldo F Busatto; Jaime Eduardo Cecílio Hallak Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2010-09-09 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: Alyssa M Myers; Patrick B Siegele; Jeffrey D Foss; Ronald F Tuma; Sara Jane Ward Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Alyssa M Myers; Patrick B Siegele; Jeffrey D Foss; Ronald F Tuma; Sara Jane Ward Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Amber S Kleckner; Ian R Kleckner; Charles S Kamen; Mohamedtaki A Tejani; Michelle C Janelsins; Gary R Morrow; Luke J Peppone Journal: Ther Adv Med Oncol Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 8.168
Authors: Francisco Navarrete; María Salud García-Gutiérrez; Ani Gasparyan; Amaya Austrich-Olivares; Jorge Manzanares Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: David P Finn; Simon Haroutounian; Andrea G Hohmann; Elliot Krane; Nadia Soliman; Andrew S C Rice Journal: Pain Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Fernanda F Peres; Alvaro C Lima; Jaime E C Hallak; José A Crippa; Regina H Silva; Vanessa C Abílio Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2018-05-11 Impact factor: 5.810