| Literature DB >> 29337873 |
Fu-Ying Qin1,2,3, Li-Zhi Cheng4, Yong-Ming Yan4, Bao-Hua Liu5, Yong-Xian Cheng6,7,8.
Abstract
Choushenflavonoids A (1) and B (2), two unusual proline-containing catechin glucosides, were isolated from the roots of Codonopsis pilosula cultivated in a high-altitude location of Yunnan province. Their structures were determined by spectroscopic data and chemical methods. Specifically, the absolute configuration of glucose residue in 1 and 2 was assigned by acid hydrolysis followed by derivatization and gas chromatography (GC) analysis. In addition, biological evaluation of 1 and 2 against Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) was carried out.Entities:
Keywords: Catechin glucosides; Choushenflavonoids A and B; Codonopsis pilosula; Proline; SIRT1
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29337873 PMCID: PMC6017075 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23010180
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The structures of 1 and 2 from Codonopsis pilosula.
1H- (600 MHz) and 13C-NMR (150 MHz) data of 1 and 2 in DMSO-d6 (δ in ppm, J in Hz).
| Position | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 4.77, d (6.4) | 81.3 d | 2 | 4.59, d (6.8) | 81.0 d |
| 3 | 3.92, m | 65.5 d | 3 | 3.88, m | 65.8 d |
| 4 | 2.59, dd (16.3, 4.7) | 26.7 t | 4 | 2.70, dd (16.2, 4.9) | 27.6 t |
| 2.45, dd (16.3, 7.1) | 2.46, dd (16.2, 7.2) | ||||
| 5 | 157.6 s | 5 | 156.1 s | ||
| 6 | 6.34, s | 94.8 d | 6 | 101.3 s | |
| 7 | 155.6 s | 7 | 155.5 s | ||
| 8 | 97.3 s | 8 | 6.18, s | 94.4 d | |
| 9 | 154.0 s | 9 | 155.3 s | ||
| 10 | 102.3 s | 10 | 102.8 s | ||
| 1′ | 130.0 s | 1′ | 130.2 s | ||
| 2′ | 6.75, br. s | 114.1 d | 2′ | 6.69, br. s | 114.4 d |
| 3′ | 144.9 s | 3′ | 146.3 s | ||
| 4′ | 145.0 s | 4′ | 146.4 s | ||
| 5′ | 6.70, d (8.1) | 115.3 d | 5′ | 6.68, d (8.1) | 115.1 d |
| 6′ | 6.62, br. d (8.1) | 117.5 d | 6′ | 6.58, br. d (8.1) | 118.2 d |
| 1′′ | 4.20, d (13.1) | 45.0 t | 1′′ | 4.13, d (13.2) | 47.5 t |
| 4.12, d (13.1) | 4.08, d (13.2) | ||||
| 2′′ | 3.80, dd (9.3, 5.2) | 66.6 d | 2′′ | 3.63, (overlap) | 67.1 d |
| 3′′ | 2.08, m | 28.0 t | 3′′ | 2.17, m | 28.3 d |
| 1.89, m | 1.86, m | ||||
| 4′′ | 1.82, m | 23.1 d | 4′′ | 1.86, m | 20.8 d |
| 1.68, m | 1.68, m | ||||
| 5′′ | 3.30, overlap | 52.2 t | 5′′ | 3.25, overlap | 53.0 t |
| 2.97, m | 2.87, m | ||||
| 6′′ | 169.9 s | 6′′ | 171.3 s | ||
| 1′′′ | 4.79, d (7.2) | 101.0 d | 1′′′ | 4.79, d (7.9) | 101.1 d |
| 2′′′ | 3.28, overlap | 72.8 d | 2′′′ | 3.24, overlap | 73.1 d |
| 3′′′ | 3.25, overlap | 76.2 d | 3′′′ | 3.24, overlap | 76.4 d |
| 4′′′ | 3.21, overlap | 69.2 d | 4′′′ | 3.13, m | 69.6 d |
| 5′′′ | 3.21, overlap | 77.2 d | 5′′′ | 3.24, overlap | 77.0 d |
| 6′′′ | 3.66, d (11.7) | 60.4 t | 6′′′ | 3.64, d (11.7) | 60.6 t |
| 3.52, dd (11.7, 3.1) | 3.42, dd (11.7, 5.7) | ||||
| 5-OH | 9.91, s | ||||
| 3′-OH | 9.08, s | ||||
| 4′-OH | 8.86, s |
Figure 2Key COSY, HMBC and ROESY correlations for 1 and 2.