| Literature DB >> 29335503 |
Chang-Min Keum1,2, Shiyi Liu3, Akram Al-Shadeedi3,4, Vikash Kaphle3, Michiel Koen Callens5, Lu Han6, Kristiaan Neyts5, Hongping Zhao6, Malte C Gather7, Scott D Bunge8, Robert J Twieg8, Antal Jakli9, Björn Lüssem3.
Abstract
Liquid-crystalline organic semiconductors exhibit unique properties that make them highly interesting for organic optoelectronic applications. Their optical and electrical anisotropies and the possibility to control the alignment of the liquid-crystalline semiconductor allow not only to optimize charge carrier transport, but to tune the optical property of organic thin-film devices as well. In this study, the molecular orientation in a liquid-crystalline semiconductor film is tuned by a novel blading process as well as by different annealing protocols. The altered alignment is verified by cross-polarized optical microscopy and spectroscopic ellipsometry. It is shown that a change in alignment of the liquid-crystalline semiconductor improves charge transport in single charge carrier devices profoundly. Comparing the current-voltage characteristics of single charge carrier devices with simulations shows an excellent agreement and from this an in-depth understanding of single charge carrier transport in two-terminal devices is obtained. Finally, p-i-n type organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) compatible with vacuum processing techniques used in state-of-the-art OLEDs are demonstrated employing liquid-crystalline host matrix in the emission layer.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29335503 PMCID: PMC5768873 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-19157-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Absorption coefficient α of C8-BTBT thin-films (40 nm) annealed at varied temperatures vs. wavelength. Inset: chemical structure of C8-BTBT.
Figure 2Illustration of the thermal-assisted blading setup. The blade is oriented at a certain angle δ with respect to the sample substrate.
Figure 3(a) Cross-polarized microscopic images of C8-BTBT films (60 nm) without treatment (left) and treated by heating (center) or blading (right) at 130 °C. The lower images are taken after rotating the samples by 45° with respect to the original orientation. The yellow arrows indicate an exemplary molecular domain that exhibits a strong contrast. (b) Normalized PL spectra of as-prepared, annealed and thermally assisted bladed C8-BTBT films (40 nm).
Figure 4(a) Schematic of the spectroscopic ellipsometry setup. The nop and nip represent the out-of-plane and in-plane refractive indices of C8-BTBT films, respectively. The angle of the incident beam with respect to the normal direction (z-direction) and the azimuthal angle are denoted as θ and φ. (b) Refractive indices of C8-BTBT films without and with heating at 90 °C. The data shown are the average of 4 different measurements ± s.d. (error bar). (c) Refractive indices of C8-BTBT films treated by blading at RT and 90 °C. The // and ⊥ symbols indicate the incident beam direction parallel and perpendicular to the blading direction, respectively. The closed triangles represent nop and the open circles nip. The refractive indices are calculated from the spectroscopic ellipsometry data measured at θ = 70° using the modeling implemented in the DeltaPsi2 software platform.
Figure 5Current density vs. voltage characteristics of n-i (30 nm)-n (NBphen doped with Cs2CO3) devices treated by (a) simple heating and (b) our blading technique at varied temperatures. The black dashed lines are the best fit to the data obtained by the modified M-G model. (c) Current density of p-i (90 nm)-p (Spiro-TTB doped with F6-TCNNQ) and n-i (90 nm)-n (Bphen doped with Cs2CO3) devices. The red dashed and black solid lines represent the fitting results by the modified M-G model (Model #1) and EGDM (Model #2), respectively.
Figure 6(a) Normalized PL spectrum of a neat C8-BTBT film doped with 10 wt% Ir(MDQ)2(acac) and normalized EL spectrum of a C8-BTBT OLED. (b) Current density and luminance vs. anode voltage characteristics of OLEDs fabricated with different treatment protocols.
Figure 7(a) Luminous efficacy (ηp) and (b) EQE (ηext) vs. current density of OLEDs fabricated with different treatment protocols. (c) Comparison of luminous efficacy and EQE at J = 0.1 mA/cm2. The lines are drawn to guide the eye. The triangles and circles represent the samples treated by heating only and blading and heating, respectively. The data are averaged over 4 different OLED samples for each condition.