Literature DB >> 29334475

Abandonment of assistive products: assessing abandonment levels and factors that impact on it.

André T Sugawara1, Vinícius D Ramos1, Fábio M Alfieri1,2, Linamara R Battistella1,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the levels and factors that influence the abandonment of assistive products by users of a local reference rehabilitation center.
METHODS: This observational study involved users who received services and assistive products provided by our center of rehabilitation. Users were identified using the records of the center and their responses about the abandonment were collected through face-to-face interviews.
RESULTS: The abandonment level of assistive products was 19.38%. 83.5% of the users use at least one of the assistive products they have received. Rigid and folding frame wheelchairs, with and without postural support devices, as well as shower wheelchairs, presented the lowest abandonment levels, followed by canes and lower limb orthoses. Upper limb orthoses, Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis(KAFO), walkers, crutches and lower and upper limb prostheses all presented higher abandonment levels.
CONCLUSION: The simultaneous use of mutiple assistive products, users perception on the importance of using them, and completing the rehabilitation treatment were found to impact on the short and long-term use of products. The study offers inputs to decision making and planning for assistive technology provision in developing countries with regard to expected demand and service delivery. Implications for Rehabilitation Data about the abandonment of assistive products in Sao Paulo, Brazil, could assist informing decision making on provision and servicing of these products in similar settings. The strong correlation found between abandonment levels and the simultaneous use of multiple devices should be taken into account by health professionals when prescribing assistive products and providing guidance to users. The need for follow up on the use of assistive products after discharge from rehabilitation treatment becomes strikingly clear, as data show that completing treatment is significantly relevant when evaluating abandonment levels. As assistive products users' perception about the importance of using these devices is shown to be significant in explaining abandonment, it is mandatory that health and rehabilitation professionals take it into account when providing guidance and training users.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assistive technology abandonment; access to assistive technology; assistive technology nonuse; assistive technology service delivery; assistive technology user satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29334475     DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1425748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol        ISSN: 1748-3107


  11 in total

1.  Understanding decision-making in prosthetic rehabilitation by prosthetists and people with lower limb amputation: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Chelsey B Anderson; Andrew J Kittelson; Shane R Wurdeman; Matthew J Miller; Jason W Stoneback; Cory L Christiansen; Dawn M Magnusson
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.439

2.  Towards a multi-user experience approach to exploring key requirements to design smart habilitation devices for children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Matthew Bonello; Philip Farrugia; Nathalie Buhagiar; Joseph Mercieca
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2022-05-25

3.  "It's All Sort of Cool and Interesting…but What Do I Do With It?" A Qualitative Study of Stroke Survivors' Perceptions of Surface Electromyography.

Authors:  Heather A Feldner; Christina Papazian; Keshia Peters; Katherine M Steele
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 4.  Smartphones-Based Assistive Technology: Accessibility Features and Apps for People with Visual Impairment, and its Usage, Challenges, and Usability Testing.

Authors:  Suraj Singh Senjam; Souvik Manna; Covadonga Bascaran
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2021-11-27

5.  An analysis of usability evaluation practices and contexts of use in wearable robotics.

Authors:  Jan Thomas Meyer; Roger Gassert; Olivier Lambercy
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  A survey on the influence of CYBATHLON on the development and acceptance of advanced assistive technologies.

Authors:  Jan T Meyer; Selina Weber; Lukas Jäger; Roland Sigrist; Roger Gassert; Olivier Lambercy
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 7.  Intention Detection Strategies for Robotic Upper-Limb Orthoses: A Scoping Review Considering Usability, Daily Life Application, and User Evaluation.

Authors:  Jessica Gantenbein; Jan Dittli; Jan Thomas Meyer; Roger Gassert; Olivier Lambercy
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Co-creation and User Perspectives for Upper Limb Prosthetics.

Authors:  Hannah Jones; Sigrid Dupan; Matthew Dyson; Agamemnon Krasoulis; Laurence P J Kenney; Margaret Donovan-Hall; Kaveh Memarzadeh; Sarah Day; Maxford Coutinho; Kianoush Nazarpour
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Human biomechanics perspective on robotics for gait assistance: challenges and potential solutions.

Authors:  Amy R Wu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 5.530

10.  Home used, patient self-managed, brain-computer interface for the management of central neuropathic pain post spinal cord injury: usability study.

Authors:  M K H Al-Taleb; M Purcell; M Fraser; N Petric-Gray; A Vuckovic
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.