| Literature DB >> 29334211 |
Poonam Sharma1, Irshad Aslam Khan2, Rambir Singh3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dietary antioxidants protect tissues and organs against insecticides/xenobiotic-induced damage. In the present study, we evaluated the results of exposure to synthetic pyrethroid insecticides, cypermethrin (Cyp) and deltamethrin (Del) and possible protective effects of curcumin and quercetin on reproductive system in male Wistar rats.Entities:
Keywords: Curcumin; Cypermethrin; Deltamethrin; Quercetin
Year: 2018 PMID: 29334211 PMCID: PMC5767937 DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2018.5160
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Fertil Steril ISSN: 2008-0778
Fig.1Effect of curcumin and quercetin in Cyp and Del-induced changes in sex organs weight. Each bar represents mean ± SEM of 6 rats.
Cyp; Cypermethrin, Del; Deltamethrin, .; P>0.05, compared to group A, p.; Compared with group A and D both, A; Control, B; Cyp, C; Del, D; Cyp+Del, E; Cyp+Del+curcumin, F; Cyp+Del+quercetin, and G; Cyp+Del+curcumin+quercetin.
Effect of curcumin and quercetin on Cyp and Del-induced changes in sperm parameters
| Parameter | Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | Group E | Group F | Group G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sperm count×106/g tissue | 72.22 ± 1.176 | 51.00 ± 0.730q** | 60.666 ± 2.028r** | 43.00 ± 1.751** | 61 ± 2.129r** | 59.666 ± 2.275r** | 68.5 ± 2.487r• |
| Sperm motility (%) | 70.475 ± 3.367 | 50.675 ± 2.54q** | 60.12 ± 3.245r• | 37.911 ± 2.909** | 60.00 ± 2.745r* | 58.00 ± 2.160r* | 69.00 ± 1.506r• |
| Sperm abnormality (%) | 43.998 ± 3.246 | 71.00 ± 1.807r** | 67.251 ± 2.627r** | 89.00 + 3.183** | 56.00 ± 3.724r* | 54.00 ± 2.769r• | 47.71 ± 2.911r• |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM of 6 rats in each group. Cyp; Cypermethrin, Del; Deltamethrin, •; P>0.05, *; P<0.05, **; P<0.01 compared with group A, p; P>0.05, q; P<0.05, r; P<0.01 compared with group D, Group A; Control, B; Cyp, C; Del, D; Cyp+Del, E; Cyp+Del+curcumin, F; Cyp+Del+quercetin, and G; Cyp+Del+curcumin+quercetin.
Fig.2Effect of curcumin and quercetin on Cyp and Del-induced changes in testicular sperm counts. A. Control, B. Cyp, C. Del, D. Cyp+Del, E. Cyp+Del+curcumin, F. Cyp+Del+quercetin, and G. Cyp+Del+curcumin+quercetin. Cyp; Cypermethrin, Del; Deltamethrin.
Effect of curcumin and quercetin on Cyp and Del-induced changes in sex hormone level
| Parameter | Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | Group E | Group F | Group G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testosterone (ng/ml) | 3.635 ± 0.745 | 0.968 ± 0.302p** | 1.255 ± 0.170p** | 0.338 ± 0.137** | 1.636 ± 0.492q* | 1.585 ± 0.495q* | 2.95 ± 0.556r• |
| FSH (mIU/ml) | 2.415 ± 0.446 | 1.025 ± 0.112p• | 1.278 ± 0.169p• | 0.856 ± 0.213* | 1.74 ± 0.494q• | 1.713 ± 0.492q• | 2.01 ± 0.454r• |
| LH (mIU/ml) | 1.98 ± 0.325 | 0.856 ± 0.213p** | 0.94 ± 0.220p** | 0.535 ± 0.126** | 0.996 ± 0.118q** | 0.833 ± 0.113q** | 1.24 ± 0.112r* |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM of 6 rats in each group.
Cyp; Cypermethrin, Del; Deltamethrin, •; P>0.05, *; P<0.05, **; P<0.01 compared with group A, p; P>0.05, q; P<0.05, r; P<0.01 compared with group D, Group A; Control, B; Cyp, C; Del, D; Cyp+Del, E; Cyp+Del+curcumin, F; Cyp+Del+quercetin, and G; Cyp+Del+curcumin+quercetin.
Effect of quercetin and curcumin on Cyp and Del-induced changes in steroidogenic enzymes
| Parameter | Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | Group E | Group F | Group G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-β HSD (pg/ml) | 0.92 ± 0.283 | 0.30 ± 0.125p• | 0.466 ± 0.105p• | 0.213 ± 0.106• | 0.761 ± 0.213q• | 0.626 ± 0.175q• | 0.89 ± 0.274r• |
| 17-β HSD (ng/ml) | 1.04 ± 0.112 | 0.43 ± 0.104p** | 0.49 ± 0.105p** | 0.205 ± 0.095** | 0.58 ± 0.124q* | 0.49 ± 0.100q** | 0.98 ± 0.113r• |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM of 6 rats in each group. Cyp; Cypermethrin, Del; Deltamethrin, •; P>0.05, *; P<0.05, **; P<0.01 compared with group A, p; P>0.05, q; P<0.05, r; P<0.01 compared with group D, Group A; Control, B; Cyp, C; Del, D; Cyp+Del, E; Cyp+Del+curcumin, F; Cyp+Del+quercetin, and G; Cyp+Del+curcumin+quercetin.
Effect of curcumin and quercetin on Cyp and Del-induced changes in lipid peroxidation, non- enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants
| Parameter | Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | Group E | Group F | Group G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPO (nmoles MDA/hours/gtissue) | 3.165 ± 0.2749 | 7.68 ± 0.166q** | 5.726 ± 0.148r** | 9.145 ± 0.489** | 7.725 ± 0.319q* * | 7.2 ± 0.402r** | 4.675 ± 0.309r* |
| GSH(µmole/g tissue) | 2.920 ± 0.288 | 1.735 ± 1.145r** | 1.986 ± 0.224r** | 0.706 ± 0.071** | 1.566 ± 0.03827r** | 1.323 ± 0.0388q** | 2.725 ± 0.1385r• |
| SOD (nmole/minutes/mg protein) | 31.911 ± 1.262 | 17.648 ± 1.631r** | 22.858 ± 1.474r** | 10.631 ± 0.5518** | 21.726 ± 0.9145r** | 19.453 ± 1.170r** | 28.874 ± 0.7624r• |
| CAT(µ mole/minutes/mg protein) | 74.14 ± 1.193 | 47.62 ± 1.335r** | 60.596 ± 1.295r** | 36.538 ± 1.331** | 69.521 ± 0.659r* | 69.123 ± 0.620r* | 72.00 ± 0.7857r• |
| GPx (nmole/minutes/mg protein) | 8.396 ± 1.005 | 5.346 ± 0.715q* | 6.613 ± 0.774q• | 3.728 ± 0.760** | 6.531 ± 0.771q• | 6.083 ± 0.736q• | 8.073 ± 0.719r• |
| GR (nmole/minutes/mg | 3.553 ± 0.339 | 2.418 ± 0.250q* | 2.808 ± 0.2778r• | 1.366 ± 0.1686** | 2.635 ± 0.185r* | 2.566 ± 0.2008r* | 3.326 ± 0.1578r• |
| GST (µmole/minutes/mg protein) | 91.015 ± 0.681 | 84.471 ± 1.141r** | 86.823 ± 0.775r* | 74.973 ± 1.284** | 78.153 ± 0.673p** | 77.906 ± 0.741p** | 83.038 ± 0.791r** |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM of 6 rats in each group.
Cyp; Cypermethrin, Del; Deltamethrin, •; P>0.05, *; P<0.05, **; P<0.01 compared with group A, p; P>0.05, q; P<0.05, r; P<0.01 compared with group D, Group A; Control, B; Cyp, C; Del, D; Cyp+Del, E; Cyp+Del+curcumin, F; Cyp+Del+quercetin, and G; Cyp+Del+curcumin+quercetin.
Fig.3Effect of curcumin and quercetin on Cyp and Del-induced changes in testicular sperm counts. A. Control, B. Cyp, C. Del, D. Cyp+Del, E. Cyp+Del+curcumin, F. Cyp+Del+quercetin, and G. Cyp+Del+curcumin+quercetin.
Cyp; Cypermethrin, Del; Deltamethrin, LC; Leydig cells, BM; Basement membrane, SG; Spermatogonia, PSC; Primary spermatocyte, SSC; Secondary spermatocyte, LST; Lumen filled with spermatids, SC; Sertoli cells, RBM; Ruptured basement membrane, DSV; Disorganized structure of seminal vesicles, NSC; Necrosis of sertoli cells, VLM; Vacuolation of lumen, NLC; Necrosis of Leydig cells, AS; Arrested stages of spermatogenesis, DSG; Disorganized spermatogonia, NST, Necrosis of spermatids, DSV; Disorganization of seminal vesicles, LLC; Loosed Leydig cells, DSC; Degeneration of sertoli cells, AS; Arrested spermatogenesis, LMDST; Lumen filled with dead spermatids, DDSV; Disorganization and disappearance of seminal vesicles, NSC; Necrosis of sertoli cell, FSG; Fading of spermatogonia, NMST non-motile spermatids, SLC; Scattering of Leydig cells, LDTST; Lumen filled with dead and tailless spermatids, TBM; Thick basement membrane, ISG; Increased spermatogonia, WLC; Well-developed Leydig cells, IS; Increased spermatogenesis, OCS; Organized sertoli cells, LMSZ; Lumen filled with spermatozoa, RBM; Recovery of basement membrane, RLC; Recovery of Leydig cell, RSG; Recovery of spermatgonia, US; Unaffected spermatogenesis, LST; Lumen filled with spermatids, SZT; Spermatozoa with tail, WBM; Well-shaped basement membrane, DSG; Dense structured spermatogonia, DPS; Densely packed primary spermatocyte, SSC; Secondary spermatocyte, WST; Well-developed spermatids with tails, LMD; Lumen filled with dense materials, OLC; Organized Leydig cells, and WCS; Well-shaped sertoli cells.