Kahli Zietlow1, Shelley R McDonald1, Richard Sloane2, Jeffrey Browndyke3, Sandhya Lagoo-Deenadayalan4, Mitchell T Heflin1,2. 1. Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Duke University Health Systems, Durham, North Carolina. 2. Center for Aging, Duke University Health Systems, Durham, North Carolina. 3. Division of Geriatric Behavioral Health, Department of Psychiatry, Duke University Health Systems, Durham, North Carolina. 4. Department of Surgery, Duke University Health Systems, Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare postoperative outcomes of individuals with and without cognitive impairment enrolled in the Perioperative Optimization of Senior Health (POSH) program at Duke University, a comanagement model involving surgery, anesthesia, and geriatrics. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of individuals enrolled in a quality improvement program. SETTING: Tertiary academic center. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults undergoing surgery and referred to POSH (N = 157). MEASUREMENTS: Cognitive impairment was defined as a score less than 25 out of 30 (adjusted for education) on the St. Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) Examination. Median length of stay (LOS), mean number of postoperative complications, rates of postoperative delirium (POD, %), 30-day readmissions (%), and discharge to home (%) were compared using bivariate analysis. RESULTS: Seventy percent of participants met criteria for cognitive impairment (mean SLUMS score 20.3 for those with cognitive impairment and 27.7 for those without). Participants with and without cognitive impairment did not significantly differ in demographic characteristics, number of medications (including anticholinergics and benzodiazepines), or burden of comorbidities. Participants with and without cognitive impairment had similar LOS (P = .99), cumulative number of complications (P = .70), and 30-day readmission (P = .20). POD was more common in those with cognitive impairment (31% vs 24%), but the difference was not significant (P = .34). Participants without cognitive impairment had higher rates of discharge to home (80.4% vs 65.1%, P = .05). CONCLUSION: Older adults with and without cognitive impairment referred to the POSH program fared similarly on most postoperative outcomes. Individuals with cognitive impairment may benefit from perioperative geriatric comanagement. Questions remain regarding the validity of available measures of cognition in the preoperative period.
OBJECTIVES: To compare postoperative outcomes of individuals with and without cognitive impairment enrolled in the Perioperative Optimization of Senior Health (POSH) program at Duke University, a comanagement model involving surgery, anesthesia, and geriatrics. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of individuals enrolled in a quality improvement program. SETTING: Tertiary academic center. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults undergoing surgery and referred to POSH (N = 157). MEASUREMENTS: Cognitive impairment was defined as a score less than 25 out of 30 (adjusted for education) on the St. Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) Examination. Median length of stay (LOS), mean number of postoperative complications, rates of postoperative delirium (POD, %), 30-day readmissions (%), and discharge to home (%) were compared using bivariate analysis. RESULTS: Seventy percent of participants met criteria for cognitive impairment (mean SLUMS score 20.3 for those with cognitive impairment and 27.7 for those without). Participants with and without cognitive impairment did not significantly differ in demographic characteristics, number of medications (including anticholinergics and benzodiazepines), or burden of comorbidities. Participants with and without cognitive impairment had similar LOS (P = .99), cumulative number of complications (P = .70), and 30-day readmission (P = .20). POD was more common in those with cognitive impairment (31% vs 24%), but the difference was not significant (P = .34). Participants without cognitive impairment had higher rates of discharge to home (80.4% vs 65.1%, P = .05). CONCLUSION: Older adults with and without cognitive impairment referred to the POSH program fared similarly on most postoperative outcomes. Individuals with cognitive impairment may benefit from perioperative geriatric comanagement. Questions remain regarding the validity of available measures of cognition in the preoperative period.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Leilani Feliciano; Sheena M Horning; Kelli J Klebe; Sarah L Anderson; R Elisabeth Cornwell; Hasker P Davis Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Lenise A Cummings-Vaughn; Neeraja N Chavakula; Theodore K Malmstrom; Nina Tumosa; John E Morley; Dulce M Cruz-Oliver Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Kahli E Zietlow; Serena Wong; Mitchell T Heflin; Shelley R McDonald; Robert Sickeler; Michael Devinney; Jeanna Blitz; Sandhya Lagoo-Deenadayalan; Miles Berger Journal: Am J Med Date: 2021-08-18 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: In Jun Yang; Heung-Kwon Oh; Jeehye Lee; Jung Wook Suh; Hong-Min Ahn; Hye Rim Shin; Jin Won Kim; Jee Hyun Kim; Changhoon Song; Jung-Yeon Choi; Duck-Woo Kim; Sung-Bum Kang Journal: Ann Surg Treat Res Date: 2022-09-06 Impact factor: 1.766