Martha Ruiz1, Miguel Peña2, Audrey Cohen2, Hossein Ehsani3, Bellal Joseph4, Mindy Fain5, Jane Mohler2, Nima Toosizadeh6. 1. Department of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona. 3. Kinesiology Department, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland. 4. Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona. 5. Arizona Center on Aging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Division of Geriatrics, General Internal Medicine and Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona. 6. Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Arizona Center on Aging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Division of Geriatrics, General Internal Medicine and Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona. Electronic address: ntoosizadeh@email.arizona.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current evaluation methods to assess physical and cognitive function are limited and often not feasible in emergency settings. The upper-extremity function (UEF) test to assess physical and cognitive performance using wearable sensors. The purpose of this study was to examine the (1) relationship between preoperative UEF scores with in-hospital outcomes; and (2) association between postoperative UEF scores with 30-d adverse outcomes among adults undergoing emergent abdominal surgery. METHODS: We performed an observational, longitudinal study among adults older than 40 y who presented with intra-abdominal symptoms. The UEF tests included a 20-sec rapid repetitive elbow flexion (physical function), and a 60-sec repetitive elbow flexion at a self-selected pace while counting backwards by threes (cognitive function), administered within 24-h of admission and within 24-h prior to discharge. Multiple logistic regression models assessed the association between UEF and outcomes. Each model consisted of the in-hospital or 30-d post-discharge outcome as the dependent variable, preoperative UEF physical and cognitive scores as hypothesis covariates, and age and sex as adjuster covariates. RESULTS: Using UEF physical and cognitive scores to predict in-hospital outcomes, an area under curve (AUC) of 0.76 was achieved, which was 17% more sensitive when compared to age independently. For 30-d outcomes, the AUC increased to 0.89 when UEF physical and cognitive scores were included in the model with age and sex. DISCUSSION: Sensor-based measures of physical and cognitive function enhance outcome prediction providing an objective practicable tool for risk stratification in emergency surgery settings among aging adults presenting with intra-abdominal symptoms.
BACKGROUND: Current evaluation methods to assess physical and cognitive function are limited and often not feasible in emergency settings. The upper-extremity function (UEF) test to assess physical and cognitive performance using wearable sensors. The purpose of this study was to examine the (1) relationship between preoperative UEF scores with in-hospital outcomes; and (2) association between postoperative UEF scores with 30-d adverse outcomes among adults undergoing emergent abdominal surgery. METHODS: We performed an observational, longitudinal study among adults older than 40 y who presented with intra-abdominal symptoms. The UEF tests included a 20-sec rapid repetitive elbow flexion (physical function), and a 60-sec repetitive elbow flexion at a self-selected pace while counting backwards by threes (cognitive function), administered within 24-h of admission and within 24-h prior to discharge. Multiple logistic regression models assessed the association between UEF and outcomes. Each model consisted of the in-hospital or 30-d post-discharge outcome as the dependent variable, preoperative UEF physical and cognitive scores as hypothesis covariates, and age and sex as adjuster covariates. RESULTS: Using UEF physical and cognitive scores to predict in-hospital outcomes, an area under curve (AUC) of 0.76 was achieved, which was 17% more sensitive when compared to age independently. For 30-d outcomes, the AUC increased to 0.89 when UEF physical and cognitive scores were included in the model with age and sex. DISCUSSION: Sensor-based measures of physical and cognitive function enhance outcome prediction providing an objective practicable tool for risk stratification in emergency surgery settings among aging adults presenting with intra-abdominal symptoms.
Authors: Mary D Naylor; Karen B Hirschman; Kathryn H Bowles; M Brian Bixby; JoAnne Konick-McMahan; Caroline Stephens Journal: Home Health Care Serv Q Date: 2007
Authors: C A Polanczyk; E Marcantonio; L Goldman; L E Rohde; J Orav; C M Mangione; T H Lee Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2001-04-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Nima Toosizadeh; Bellal Joseph; Michelle R Heusser; Tahereh Orouji Jokar; Jane Mohler; Herb A Phelan; Bijan Najafi Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Martin A Makary; Dorry L Segev; Peter J Pronovost; Dora Syin; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Purvi Patel; Ryan Takenaga; Lara Devgan; Christine G Holzmueller; Jing Tian; Linda P Fried Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Andrew D Ablett; Kathryn McCarthy; Ben Carter; Lyndsay Pearce; Michael Stechman; Susan Moug; Jonathan Hewitt; Phyo K Myint Journal: Surgery Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 3.982