Literature DB >> 29332187

Human bite injuries to the head and neck: current trends and management protocols in England and Wales.

Glyndwr W Jenkins1, Robert Isaac2, Shakir Mustafa2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Human bite injuries can be challenging in their presentation to the examining physician. In a study by Merchant et al., 18% of patients presenting with a human bite injury had suffered wounds to the head and neck region. Current trends in their initial management at presentation to emergency departments throughout England and Wales will be discussed in this paper. MATERIALS AND
METHOD: A postal survey was sent out to 100 A&E lead clinicians. This was followed up by telephone enquiries to improve the response rate. The collated results of the survey were entered onto a spreadsheet (Microsoft Excel©) for the purpose of statistical review.
RESULTS: A 68% response rate from A&E departments throughout England and Wales demonstrated a lack of consensus in the initial management and subsequent treatment of human bite injuries. Written protocols are in place for human bite injuries in 54.4% of units. In 100% of units, initial management involves irrigation +/- debridement of the wound, though there is a lack of agreement on the surgical management of the wound. 77.9% of units follow 'needle stick protocols' when stratifying risk for blood-borne viruses.
CONCLUSION: Human bites pose a number of unique problems, ranging from cellulitis to the transmission of communicable diseases. The maxillofacial surgeon has the added dilemmas surrounding subsequent repair and reconstruction. Appreciation of the complexity of human bite injuries will ensure optimal care for the patient. We propose a set of guidelines developed 'in-house' to assist in the management of human bite injuries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood-borne viruses; Human bite; Treatment protocols

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29332187     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-018-0670-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  21 in total

1.  Quantitative bacterial analysis of comparative wound irrigations.

Authors:  M L Hamer; M C Robson; T J Krizek; W O Southwick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Lacerations of the mouth.

Authors:  B D Armstrong
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 3.  Microbiology and management of human and animal bite wound infections.

Authors:  Itzhak Brook
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.907

Review 4.  Best evidence topic report. Are antibiotics indicated following human bites?

Authors:  Alma-Victoria Rittner; Kevin Fitzpatrick; Alasdair Corfield
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Management of posttraumatic soft tissue infections.

Authors:  A Omar Abubaker
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  A study of primary closure of human bite injuries to the face.

Authors:  P Donkor; D O Bankas
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 7.  Facial bite wounds: management update.

Authors:  P K Stefanopoulos; A D Tarantzopoulou
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 8.  Managing bite wounds. Currently recommended antibiotics for treatment and prophylaxis.

Authors:  Randy A Taplitz
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Management of animal and human bites in the head and neck.

Authors:  F J Stucker; G Y Shaw; S Boyd; W W Shockley
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1990-07

10.  The human bite injury: a clinical audit and discussion regarding the management of this alcohol fuelled phenomenon.

Authors:  Francis P Henry; Elizabeth M Purcell; Patricia A Eadie
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.740

View more
  1 in total

1.  Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Plastic Surgery: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study.

Authors:  Susanna Esposito; Rossella Sgarzani; Sonia Bianchini; Sara Monaco; Laura Nicoletti; Erika Rigotti; Marilia Di Pietro; Roberta Opri; Caterina Caminiti; Matilde Ciccia; Giorgio Conti; Daniele Donà; Mario Giuffré; Stefania La Grutta; Laura Lancella; Mario Lima; Andrea Lo Vecchio; Gloria Pelizzo; Giorgio Piacentini; Carlo Pietrasanta; Matteo Puntoni; Alessandro Simonini; Elisabetta Venturini; Annamaria Staiano; Nicola Principi
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.