Literature DB >> 29330651

3D-computed tomography to compare the dimensions of the left atrial appendage in patients with normal sinus rhythm and those with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Maiko Hozawa1, Yoshihiro Morino2, Yuki Matsumoto1, Ryoichi Tanaka3, Kyohei Nagata1, Akiko Kumagai4, Atsushi Tashiro5, Akio Doi6, Kunihiro Yoshioka3.   

Abstract

Although paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is an important cause of cardioembolic stroke, in contrast to chronic AF patients, the anatomical features of the left atrial appendage (LAA) in PAF patients remain unknown. Here, we investigated differences in LAA structures in patients with PAF and those with normal sinus rhythms (NSR) using 3D-computed tomography (3D-CT), which allows us to visualize complicated LAA structures at high spatial resolution. Study subjects were 30 consecutive PAF and 30 NSR patients with complete enhanced cardiac 3D-CT images available. After reconstruction of 3D LAA images, anatomical parameters of the LAA were measured and compared according to three proposed definitions of the LAA orifice plane determined by the following anatomical landmarks: DEF#1, center of warfarin ridge and centerline of proximal left circumflex artery; DEF#2, slope of warfarin ridge and mitral valve annulus; DEF#3, observers' discretion by progressive rotation using the observers' best estimate without the use of landmarks. The LAA volumes of the PAF groups were significantly greater than the NSR group according to all 3 definitions (DEF#1: 1.43 times, DEF#2: 1.44 times, and DEF#3: 1.36 times greater). The LAA orifice area was significantly larger in PAF than in NSR according to DEF#2, but was similar by DEF#1 and DEF#3. Intra-observer and inter-observer variations for any LAA measurements were very low. In conclusion, 3D-CT-based quantitative assessment of the LAA provides highly reproducible and detailed measurements, which can successfully discriminate differences of LAA volume between patients with NSR and those with PAF, suggesting significantly greater volumes in the latter.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardioembolic stroke; Computed tomography; Left atrial appendage; Orifice; Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29330651     DOI: 10.1007/s00380-018-1119-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Vessels        ISSN: 0910-8327            Impact factor:   2.037


  29 in total

1.  Analysis of left atrial appendix by dual-source CT coronary angiography: morphologic classification and imaging by volume rendered CT images.

Authors:  Bekir Erol; Musturay Karcaaltincaba; Kudret Aytemir; Nurdan Cay; Tuncay Hazirolan; Deniz Akata
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Changes in Left Atrial Appendage Dimensions Following Volume Loading During Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

Authors:  Ryan J Spencer; Peggy DeJong; Peter Fahmy; Mathieu Lempereur; Michael Y C Tsang; Kenneth G Gin; Pui K Lee; Parvathy Nair; Teresa S M Tsang; John Jue; Jacqueline Saw
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.195

3.  Assessment of normal left atrial appendage anatomy and function over gender and ages by dynamic cardiac CT.

Authors:  Samy Boucebci; Thomas Pambrun; Stéphane Velasco; Pier-Olivier Duboe; Pierre Ingrand; Jean-Pierre Tasu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Anatomical remodeling of left atria in subjects with chronic and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation evaluated by multislice computed tomography.

Authors:  Megumi Imada; Nobusada Funabashi; Miki Asano; Masae Uehara; Marehiko Ueda; Issei Komuro
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Left Atrial Appendage Closure Guided by Personalized 3D-Printed Cardiac Reconstruction.

Authors:  James M Otton; Roberto Spina; Romina Sulas; Rajesh N Subbiah; Neil Jacobs; David W M Muller; Brendan Gunalingam
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 11.195

6.  The WATCHMAN left atrial appendage closure device for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Sven Möbius-Winkler; Marcus Sandri; Norman Mangner; Phillip Lurz; Ingo Dähnert; Gerhard Schuler
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 7.  Echocardiographic assessment of the left atrial appendage.

Authors:  Y Agmon; B K Khandheria; F Gentile; J B Seward
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Left atrial appendage studied by computed tomography to help planning for appendage closure device placement.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Luigi Di Biase; Rodney P Horton; Tuan Nguyen; Prasant Morhanty; Andrea Natale
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-09

9.  Predicting Peri-Device Leakage of Left Atrial Appendage Device Closure Using Novel Three-Dimensional Geometric CT Analysis.

Authors:  Hyemoon Chung; Byunghwan Jeon; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Dongjin Han; Hackjoon Shim; In Jeong Cho; Chi Young Shim; Geu-Ru Hong; Jung-Sun Kim; Yangsoo Jang; Namsik Chung
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2015-12-30

10.  Left atrial appendage volume increased in more than half of patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Authors:  Mikko Taina; Ritva Vanninen; Marja Hedman; Pekka Jäkälä; Satu Kärkkäinen; Tero Tapiola; Petri Sipola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Computed Tomography of the Left Atrium and Left Atrial Appendage: A Pictorial Essay on the Anatomy, Normal Variants, and Pathology].

Authors:  Minji Song; Sung Jin Kim; Hyun Jung Koo; Moon Young Kim; Jin Young Yoo
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2020-03-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.