Literature DB >> 29330208

Neuroendocrine Tumor Heterogeneity Adds Uncertainty to the World Health Organization 2010 Classification: Real-World Data from the Spanish Tumor Registry (R-GETNE).

Barbara Nuñez-Valdovinos1, Alberto Carmona-Bayonas2, Paula Jimenez-Fonseca3, Jaume Capdevila4, Ángel Castaño-Pascual5, Marta Benavent6, Jose Javier Pi Barrio7, Alex Teule8, Vicente Alonso9, Ana Custodio10, Monica Marazuela11, Ángel Segura12, Adolfo Beguiristain13, Marta Llanos14, Maria Purificacion Martinez Del Prado15, Jose Angel Diaz-Perez16, Daniel Castellano1, Isabel Sevilla17, Carlos Lopez18, Teresa Alonso19, Rocio Garcia-Carbonero20,21.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are a complex family of tumors of widely variable clinical behavior. The World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 classification provided a valuable tool to stratify neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in three prognostic subgroups based on the proliferation index. However, substantial heterogeneity remains within these subgroups, and simplicity sometimes entails an ambiguous and imprecise prognostic stratification. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of histological differentiation within the WHO 2010 grade (G) 1/G2/G3 categories, and explore additional Ki-67 cutoff values in GEP-NENs. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: A total of 2,813 patients from the Spanish National Tumor Registry (RGETNE) were analyzed. Cases were classified by histological differentiation as NETs (neuroendocrine tumors [well differentiated]) or NECs (neuroendocrine carcinomas [poorly differentiated]), and by Ki-67 index as G1 (Ki-67 <2%), G2 (Ki-67 3%-20%), or G3 (Ki-67 >20%). Patients were stratified into five cohorts: NET-G1, NET-G2, NET-G3, NEC-G2, and NEC-G3.
RESULTS: Five-year survival was 72%. Age, gender, tumor site, grade, differentiation, and stage were all independent prognostic factors for survival. Further subdivision of the WHO 2010 grading improved prognostic stratification, both within G2 (5-year survival: 81% [Ki-67 3%-5%], 72% [Ki-67 6%-10%], 52% [Ki-67 11%-20%]) and G3 NENs (5-year survival: 35% [Ki-67 21%-50%], 22% [Ki-67 51%-100%]). Five-year survival was significantly greater for NET-G2 versus NEC-G2 (75.5% vs. 58.2%) and NET-G3 versus NEC-G3 (43.7% vs. 25.4%).
CONCLUSION: Substantial clinical heterogeneity is observed within G2 and G3 GEP-NENs. The WHO 2010 classification can be improved by including the additive effect of histological differentiation and the proliferation index. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are tumors of widely variable clinical behavior, roughly stratified by the World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 classification into three subgroups based on proliferation index. Real-world data from 2,813 patients of the Spanish Registry RGETNE demonstrated substantial clinical heterogeneity within grade (G) 2 and G3 neuroendocrine neoplasms. Tumor morphology and further subdivision of grading substantially improves prognostic stratification of these patients and may help individualize therapy. This combined, additive effect shall be considered in future classifications of neuroendocrine tumors and incorporated for stratification purposes in clinical trials. © AlphaMed Press 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastroenteropancreatic; Heterogeneity; Ki‐67; Neuroendocrine neoplasms; Prognosis; Registry; Tumor differentiation; World Health Organization 2010

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29330208      PMCID: PMC5896708          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  22 in total

1.  The high-grade (WHO G3) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor category is morphologically and biologically heterogenous and includes both well differentiated and poorly differentiated neoplasms.

Authors:  Olca Basturk; Zhaohai Yang; Laura H Tang; Ralph H Hruban; Volkan Adsay; Chad M McCall; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Kee-Taek Jang; Wendy L Frankel; Serdar Balci; Carlie Sigel; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Characteristics and treatment of patients with G3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  M Heetfeld; C N Chougnet; I H Olsen; A Rinke; I Borbath; G Crespo; J Barriuso; M Pavel; D O'Toole; T Walter
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 5.678

3.  Metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic endocrine carcinomas: analysis of factors associated with disease progression.

Authors:  Francesco Panzuto; Letizia Boninsegna; Nicola Fazio; Davide Campana; Maria Pia Brizzi; Gabriele Capurso; Aldo Scarpa; Filippo De Braud; Luigi Dogliotti; Paola Tomassetti; Gianfranco Delle Fave; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  TNM staging of neoplasms of the endocrine pancreas: results from a large international cohort study.

Authors:  G Rindi; M Falconi; C Klersy; L Albarello; L Boninsegna; M W Buchler; C Capella; M Caplin; A Couvelard; C Doglioni; G Delle Fave; L Fischer; G Fusai; W W de Herder; H Jann; P Komminoth; R R de Krijger; S La Rosa; T V Luong; U Pape; A Perren; P Ruszniewski; A Scarpa; A Schmitt; E Solcia; B Wiedenmann
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Incidence, patterns of care and prognostic factors for outcome of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs): results from the National Cancer Registry of Spain (RGETNE).

Authors:  R Garcia-Carbonero; J Capdevila; G Crespo-Herrero; J A Díaz-Pérez; M P Martínez Del Prado; V Alonso Orduña; I Sevilla-García; C Villabona-Artero; A Beguiristain-Gómez; M Llanos-Muñoz; M Marazuela; C Alvarez-Escola; D Castellano; E Vilar; P Jiménez-Fonseca; A Teulé; J Sastre-Valera; M Benavent-Viñuelas; A Monleon; R Salazar
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Genomic Profiling of Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung.

Authors:  Tomohiro Miyoshi; Shigeki Umemura; Yuki Matsumura; Sachiyo Mimaki; Satoshi Tada; Hideki Makinoshima; Genichiro Ishii; Hibiki Udagawa; Shingo Matsumoto; Kiyotaka Yoh; Seiji Niho; Hironobu Ohmatsu; Keiju Aokage; Tomoyuki Hishida; Junji Yoshida; Kanji Nagai; Koichi Goto; Masahiro Tsuboi; Katsuya Tsuchihara
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  The gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine cell system and its tumors: the WHO classification.

Authors:  Günter Klöppel; Aurel Perren; Philipp U Heitz
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Are G3 ENETS neuroendocrine neoplasms heterogeneous?

Authors:  Fritz-Line Vélayoudom-Céphise; Pierre Duvillard; Lydia Foucan; Julien Hadoux; Cecile N Chougnet; Sophie Leboulleux; David Malka; Joël Guigay; Diane Goere; Thierry Debaere; Caroline Caramella; Martin Schlumberger; David Planchard; Dominique Elias; Michel Ducreux; Jean-Yves Scoazec; Eric Baudin
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 9.  The 2010 WHO classification of digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms: a critical appraisal four years after its introduction.

Authors:  G Rindi; G Petrone; F Inzani
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.943

10.  Multiple Imputation by Fully Conditional Specification for Dealing with Missing Data in a Large Epidemiologic Study.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Anindya De
Journal:  Int J Stat Med Res       Date:  2015-08-19
View more
  21 in total

1.  The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Paper on the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  James R Howe; Nipun B Merchant; Claudius Conrad; Xavier M Keutgen; Julie Hallet; Jeffrey A Drebin; Rebecca M Minter; Terry C Lairmore; Jennifer F Tseng; Herbert J Zeh; Steven K Libutti; Gagandeep Singh; Jeffrey E Lee; Thomas A Hope; Michelle K Kim; Yusuf Menda; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Jennifer A Chan; Rodney F Pommier
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.327

2.  Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram to Guide Decision-Making for High-Grade Digestive Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Authors:  Zhenyu Lin; Haihong Wang; Yixuan Zhang; Guiling Li; Guoliang Pi; Xianjun Yu; Yaobing Chen; Kaizhou Jin; Liangkai Chen; Shengli Yang; Ying Zhu; Gang Wu; Jie Chen; Tao Zhang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-11-29

3.  Histologic and molecular features of small well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors associated with the development of liver metastases.

Authors:  Paula Jiménez-Fonseca; Patricia Morales Del Burgo; Felipe Alvarez-Manceñido
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 7.293

4.  Infiltration pattern predicts metastasis and progression better than the T-stage and grade in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a proposal for a novel infiltration-based morphologic grading.

Authors:  Orhun Cig Taskin; Michelle D Reid; Pelin Bagci; Serdar Balci; Ayse Armutlu; Deniz Demirtas; Burcin Pehlivanoglu; Burcu Saka; Bahar Memis; Emine Bozkurtlar; Can Berk Leblebici; Adelina Birceanu; Yue Xue; Mert Erkan; Yersu Kapran; Arzu Baygul; Cenk Sokmensuer; Aldo Scarpa; Claudio Luchini; Olca Basturk; Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram to Guide Decision-Making for High-Grade Digestive Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Authors:  Zhenyu Lin; Haihong Wang; Yixuan Zhang; Guiling Li; Guoliang Pi; Xianjun Yu; Yaobing Chen; Kaizhou Jin; Liangkai Chen; Shengli Yang; Ying Zhu; Gang Wu; Jie Chen; Tao Zhang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-11-29

Review 6.  Multilayered heterogeneity as an intrinsic hallmark of neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Sergio Pedraza-Arévalo; Manuel D Gahete; Emilia Alors-Pérez; Raúl M Luque; Justo P Castaño
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 6.514

7.  Prognostic Significance of Somatostatin Receptor Heterogeneity in Progressive Neuroendocrine Tumor Treated with Lu-177 DOTATOC or Lu-177 DOTATATE.

Authors:  Josephine Graf; Ulrich-Frank Pape; Henning Jann; Timm Denecke; Ruza Arsenic; Winfried Brenner; Marianne Pavel; Vikas Prasad
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Survival and prognostic factors analysis of 151 intestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a single center experience.

Authors:  Fanny Foubert; Maëva Salimon; Clotilde Dumars; Nicolas Regenet; Paul Girot; Aurélien Venara; Hélène Senellart; Marie-Françoise Heymann; Tamara Matysiak-Budnik; Yann Touchefeu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-02

9.  Somatostatin Analogs for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Any Benefit When Ki-67 Is ≥10%?

Authors:  Elettra Merola; Teresa Alonso Gordoa; Panpan Zhang; Taymeyah Al-Toubah; Eleonora Pellè; Agnieszka Kolasińska-Ćwikła; Wouter Zandee; Faidon Laskaratos; Louis de Mestier; Angela Lamarca; Jorge Hernando; Jaroslaw Cwikla; Jonathan Strosberg; Wouter de Herder; Martin Caplin; Mauro Cives; Rachel van Leeuwaarde
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-12-29

10.  Prolonged progression-free survival achieved by octreotide LAR plus transarterial embolization in low-to-intermediate grade neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases with high hepatic tumor burden.

Authors:  Yiming Liu; Haikuan Liu; Wenchuan Chen; Hang Yu; Wang Yao; Wenzhe Fan; Jiaping Li; Minhu Chen; Jie Chen; Yu Wang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.